Evaluating the quality of project planning: A model and field results

International Journal of Production Research

Volumn 42, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 1545-1556

  Zwikael, O ^a   Globerson, S ^b  

^a HOLON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

^b TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; MANAGERS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RISK MANAGEMENT; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

PROJECT COMPLETION; PROJECT PLANNING;

PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

EID: 1542790563     PISSN: 00207543     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207540310001639955     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. COUTURE, D. and RUSSETT, R., 1998, Assessing project management maturity in a supplier environment. Proceedings of the 29th Annual Project Management Institute.
2. CROSBY, P. B., 1979, Quality is Free (New York: McGraw-Hill).
3. GARMEZY, N., HARLOW, H. F., JONES, L. V. and STEVENSON, H. W., 1967, Principles of General Psychology (New York: Ronald).
4. GLOBERSON, S. and ZWIKAEL, O., 2002, Impact of the project manager on project management planning processes. Project Management Journal, 33, 58-64.
5. GRIFFITH, T. L., 1996, Negotiating successful technology implementation - a motivation perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 13, 29-53.
6. HARTER, E. H., KRISHAN, M. S. and SLAUGHTER, S. A., 2000, Effects of process maturity on quality, cycle time and effort in software product development. Management Science, 46, 451-466.
7. IBBS, C. W. and KWAK, Y. H., 2000, Assessing project management maturity. Project Management Journal, 31, 32-43.
8. JOHNSON, J., KAREN, D., BOUCHER, K. C. and ROBINSON, J., 2001, Collaborating on project success. Software Magazine, February/March.
9. MEREDITH J. R. and MANTEL, S. J., 1995, Project Management - A Managerial Approach (New York: Wiley).
10. MULLALY, M., 1998, 1997 Canadian Project Management Baseline Study. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium, Long Beach, CA (Newtown Square: PMI), pp. 375-384.
11. PAULK, M. C., CURTIS, B., CHRISSIS, M. B. and WEBER, C. V., 1995, The Capability Maturity Model for Software, Carnegie Mellon University, USA.
12. PINTO, J. K. and SLEVIN, D. P., 1988, Critical success factors across the project life cycle. Project Management Journal, 19, 67-75.
13. PMI STANDARDS COMMITTEE, 2000, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (Newtown Square: Project Management Institute).
14. RAZ, T., SHENHAR, A. J. and DVIR, D., 2002, Risk management, project success and technological uncertainty. R&D Management, 32, 101-109.
15. RUSSELL, R. S. and TAYLOR, B. W., 2003, Operations Management, 4th edn (NJ: Pearson Education).
16. SNEAD, K. C. and HARRELL, A. M., 1994, An application of expectancy theory to explain a manager's intention to use a decision support system. Decision Sciences, 25, 499-513.
17. TATIKONDA, M. V and MONTOYA-WEISS, M. M., 2001, Integrating operations and marketing perspectives of product innovation: the influence of organizational process factors and capabilities on development performance. Management Science, January, 47.
18. VELIYATH, R., HERMANSON, H. M. and HERMANSON, D. R., 1997, Organizational control systems: matching controls with organizational levels. Review of Business, Winter.
19. VROOM, V. H., 1964, Work and Motivation (New York: Wiley).
20. WATSON, W. E. and BEHNKE, R. R., 1991, Application of expectancy theory and user observations in identifying factors which affect human performances on computer projects. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 7, 363-376.
21. YIMING, C. and HAU, L., 2000, Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use a groupware application. In Proceedings of the 2000 Information Resource Management Association International Conference, Anchorage, AK, pp. 419-422.
22. ZUBROW, D., HAYES, W., SIEGEL, J. and GOLDENSON, D., 1994, Maturity Questionnaire - Special Report. CMU, SEI-94-SR-7, Carnegie Mellon University, USA.