Radioactive seed localization breast biopsy and lumpectomy: Can specimen radiographs be eliminated?

Annals of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 10, Issue 9, 2003, Pages 1039-1047

  Cox, Charles E ^a   Furman, Ben ^a   Stowell, Nicholas ^a   Ebert, Mark ^a   Clark, John ^a   Dupont, Elizabeth ^a   Shons, Alan ^a   Berman, Claudia ^a   Beauchamp, John ^a   Gardner, Mary ^a   Hersch, Marla ^a   Venugopal, Priya ^a   Szabunio, Margaret ^a   Cressman, Joanne ^a   Diaz, Nils ^a   Vrcel, Vesna ^a   Fairclough, Rita ^a  

^a H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

125I radioactive seeds; Biopsy; Nonpalpable lesion; Specimen radiograph

Indexed keywords

IODINE 125; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; RADIOACTIVE IODINE; TITANIUM;

BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST LESION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; RADIODIAGNOSIS; REOPERATION; REVIEW; SCINTIMAMMOGRAPHY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUMOR DIAGNOSIS; TUMOR LOCALIZATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOPSY; BRACHYTHERAPY; BREAST TUMOR; CALCINOSIS; CLINICAL TRIAL; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; SEGMENTAL MASTECTOMY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; BIOPSY; BRACHYTHERAPY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CALCINOSIS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; IODINE RADIOISOTOPES; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TITANIUM;

EID: 1542751121     PISSN: 10689265     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1245/ASO.2003.03.050     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. Bristol JB, Jones PA. Transgression of localizing wire into the pleural cavity prior to mammography. Br J Radiol 1981;54:139-40.
2. Davis PS, Wechsler RJ, Feig SA, et al. Migration of breast biopsy localization wire. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988;150:787-8.
3. Homer MJ, Pile-Spellman ER. Needle localization of occult breast lesions with a curved-end retractable wire: technique and pitfalls. Radiology 1986;161:547-8.
4. Homer MJ. Transection of the localization hooked wire during breast biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1983;141:929-30.
5. Gray RJ, Salud C, Nguyen K, et al. Randomized prospective evaluation of a novel technique for biopsy or lumpectomy of nonpalpable breast lesions: radioactive seed versus wire localization. Ann Surg Oncol 2001;8:711-5.
6. Cox CE, Reintgen DS, Nicosia SV, et al. Analysis of residual cancer after diagnostic breast biopsy: an argument for fine-needle aspiration cytology. Ann Surg Oncol 1995;2:201-206.
7. Yim JH, Barton P, Weber B, et al. Mammographically detected breast cancer. Benefits of stereotactic core versus wire localization biopsy. Ann Surg 1996;223:688-97.
8. De Cicco C, Pizzamiglio M, Trifiro G, et al. Radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL) and surgical biopsy in breast cancer. Technical aspects. Q J Nucl Med 2002;46:145-51.
9. Smith LF, Henry-Tillman R, Harms S, et al. Hematoma-directed ultrasound-guided breast biopsy. Ann Surg 2001;223:669-75.
10. Bimston DN, Bebb GG, Wagman LD. Is specimen mammography beneficial? Arch Surg 2000;135:1083-8.