Verbal integration: The interaction of participant roles and sentential argument structure

Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 497-516

  Ahrens, Kathleen ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; MALE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEMANTICS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; MALE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEMANTICS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 1542750994     PISSN: 00906905     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1025452814385     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ahrens, K. (1995). The mental representation of verbs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California at San Diego.
2. Ahrens, K., & Swinney, D. (1995). Participant roles and the processing of verbs during sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 533-547.
3. Boland, J. (1991). The use of lexical knowledge in sentence processing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Rochester, New York.
4. Boland, J. (1993). The role of verb argument structure in sentence processing: Distinguishing between syntactic and semantic effects. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22, 133-152.
5. Boland, J. (1997). The relationship between syntactic and semantic processes in sentence comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 423-484.
6. Carlson, G., & Tanenhaus, M. (1988). Thematic roles and language comprehension. In Syntax and semantics (Vol. 21, pp. 263-289). New York: Academic Press.
7. Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
8. DiSciullo, A., & Williams, E. (1987). On the definition of a word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Ferreira, F., & McClure, K. (1997). Processing of garden-path sentences with reciprocal verbs. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 273-306.
10. Fillmore, C. 1968. The case for case. In Bach & Harms (Eds.), Universals of linguistic theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winstont.
11. Francis, W., & Kucera, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
12. Goldberg, A. (1992). Argument structure constructions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
13. Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. Grimshaw, J. (1979). Complement selection and the lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry, 10, 279-326.
15. Hale, K., & Keyser, J. (1986). Some transitivity alternations in English. Lexicon Project Working Papers 7. Cambridge, MA: Center for Cognitive Science, MIT.
16. Hale, K., & Keyser, J. 1987. A view from the middle. Lexicon Project Working Papers 10, Cambridge, MA: Center for Cognitive Science, MIT.
17. Hale, K., & Keyser, J. (1993). On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In K. Hale & J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building 20: Essays in honor of Sylvian Bromberger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Jurafsky, D. (1992). An on-line computational model of human sentence interpretation: A theory of the representation and use of linguistic knowledge. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.
19. Levin, B. (1985). Lexical semantics in review: An introduction. In B. Levin (Ed.), Lexical semantics in review, Lexicon Project Working Papers 1. Cambridge, MA: Center for Cognitive Science, MIT.
20. Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M. (1995). Unaccusativity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Marslen-Wilson, W., & Tyler, L. K. (1980). The temporal structure of spoken language understanding. Cognition, 8, 1-71.
22. McRae, K. T., Ferretti, T., & Amyote L. (1997). Thematic roles as verb-specific concepts. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 137-176.
23. Melinger, A., & Mauner, G. (1999). When are implicit agents encoded? Evidence from cross-modal naming. Brain and Language, 68, 185-191.
24. Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary (1974). Third Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Pritchett, B. (1988). Garden path phenomena and the grammatical basis of language processing. Language, 64, 539-576.
27. Rappaport, M. & Levin, B. (1988). What to do with theta-roles. In W. Wilkins (Ed.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 21). New York: Academic Press.
28. Rappaport Hovav, M., & Levin, B. (1998). Building verb meanings. In M. Butt & W. Geuder (Eds.), The projection of arguments: Lexical and compositional factors. Stanford, CA: CSLI Press.
29. Rappaport, M., Laughren, M., & Levin, B. (1987). Levels of lexical representation. Lexicon Project Working Papers 20. Cambridge, MA: Center for Cognitive Science, MIT.
30. Rappaport, M., Laughren, M. & Levin, B. (1993). Levels of lexical representation. In J. Pustejovsky (Ed.), Semantics and the lexicon. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
31. Shapiro, L., Zurif, E., & Grimshaw, J. (1987). Sentence processing and the mental representation of verbs. Cognition. 27, 219-246.
32. Taraban, R. & McClelland, J. (1988). Constituent attachment and thematic role assignment in sentence processing: Influences of context-based expectations. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 597-632.