The control of the consumer risk in the Ames assay

Drug Information Journal

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 363-367

  Neuhäuser, Markus ^a   Hothorn, Ludwig A ^b  

^a Solvay Pharmaceuticals GmbH   (Germany)

^b LEIBNIZ UNIVERSITY HANNOVER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Ames assay; Consumer risk; Difference approach; Equivalence test procedures for ordered many to one designs

Indexed keywords

DRUG; HISTIDINE;

AMES TEST; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONSUMER; GENETIC TOXICOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK; SAFETY; SALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM; SAMPLE; STATISTICS; VARIANCE;

EID: 0342437485     PISSN: 00928615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/009286159703100207     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Ames BN, McCann J, Yamasaki E. Methods for detecting carcinogens and mutagens with the Salmonella/ Mammalian-microsome mutagenicity test. Mutation Res. 1975;31:347-364.
2. Edler L. Statistical methods for short-term tests in genetic toxicology. The first fifteen years. Mutation Res. 1992;277:11-33.
3. Consul P, Jain G. A generalization of the Poisson distribution. Technometrics. 1973;15:791-799.
4. Broekhoven LH, Nestmann ER. Statistical analysis of the Salmonella mutagenicity assay. In: Krewski D, Franklin C, eds. Statistics in toxicology. London: Gordon and Breach; 1991:205-264.
5. Chu KC, Patel KM, Lin AH, Tarone RE, Lin MS, Dunkel VC. Evaluating statistical analyses and reproducibility of microbial mutagenicity assays. Mutation Res. 1981;85:119-132.
6. Moore D, Felton JS. A microcomputer program for analyzing Ames test data. Mutation Res. 1986;119:95-102.
7. Simpson DG, Margolin BH. Nonparametric testing for dose-response curves subject to downturns: Asymptotic power considerations. Ann Stat. 1990;18:373-390.
8. Schmoor C, Schumacher M. Adaptive statistical procedures for the analysis of nonmonotone dose-response relationships. Biometrie Informatik Medizin Biologie. 1992;23:113-126.
9. Chen YI. Nonparametric comparisons of umbrella pattern treatment effects with a control in a one-way layout. Comm Stat - Simula. 1995;B22:749-764.
10. Rom DM, Costello RJ, Connell LT. On closed test procedures for dose-response analysis. Stat Med. 1994;13: 1583-1596.
11. Tamhane AC, Hochberg Y, Dunnett CW. Multiple test procedures for dose finding. Biometrics. 1996;52:21-37.
12. McCann J, Horn L, Kaldor J. An evaluation of Salmonella (Ames) test data in the published literature: Application of statistical procedures and analysis of mutagenic potency. Mutation Res. 1984;134:1-47.
13. Sakomoto Y, Hamada C, Wada T. Statistical characterization of negative control data in the Ames test. Mutation Res. 1992;272:280.
14. Jonckheere AR. A distribution-free k-sample test against ordered alternatives. Biometrika. 1954;41:133-145.
15. Akritas MG, Arnold SS, Brunner E. Non-parametric hypotheses and rank statistics for unbalanced factorial designs. J Am Stat Assoc. 1997.
16. Morris RW, Dietz EJ. How to perform Jonckheere's test using the CORR procedure. Proceedings of the 14th annual SAS users group international conference: 1989;1337-1339.
17. Berry JJ. A simulation-based approach to some nonparametric statistics problems. Observations. 1995;5: 19-26.
18. Neuhäuser M, Hothorn LA. Auswertung der Dosis-Wirkungs-Abhängigkeit des Ames Mutagenitätsassay bei direkter Kontrolle des Konsumentenrisikos. In: Trampisch HJ, Lange S, eds. Medizinische Forschung - Ärztliches Handeln. Munich: MMV Medizin Verlag; 1995:113-116.
19. Hauschke D. Statistical proof of safety in preclinical testing. Drug Inf J. 1997;31.