Context-dependent stimulus presentation to freely moving animals in 3D

Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Volumn 135, Issue 1-2, 2004, Pages 149-157

  Fry, S N ^a   Muller P ^b   Baumann, H J ^b   Straw, A D ^c   Bichsel, M ^d   Robert, D ^e  

^a Institute of Neuroinformatics Zurich   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^d Intelliact AG   (Switzerland)

^e UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

3D; Acoustics; Behavior; Closed loop; Flight; Insect; Tracking; Vision

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FLYING; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TECHNOLOGY;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; DIPTERA; FLIGHT, ANIMAL; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PROPRIOCEPTION; SOFTWARE DESIGN; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 1542617845     PISSN: 01650270     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.12.012     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Avadhanula S, Wood RJ, Campolo D, Fearing RS. Dynamically tuned design of the MFI thorax. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation; 2002.
2. Bach M., Meigen T., Strasburger H. Raster-scan cathode-ray tubes for vision research. Limits of resolution in space, time and intensity, and some solutions. Spat. Vis. 10:1997;403-414.
3. Brünnert U., Kelber A., Zeil J. Ground-nesting bees determine the location of their nest relative to a landmark by other than angular size cues. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 175:1994;363-369.
4. Cade Q. Acoustically orienting parasitoids: fly phonotaxis to cricket song. Science. 190:1975;1312-1313.
5. Collett T.S., Land M.F. Visual control of flight behaviour in the hoverfly Syritta pipiens L. J. Comp. Physiol. 99:1975;1-66.
6. Cowan WB. Displays for vision research. In: Bass M (Ed.). Handbook of optics, vol. 1, Fundamentals, techniques, and design. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1995. p. 27.1-27.44.
7. Delbrück T. Silicon retina with correlation-based, velocity-tuned pixels. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks. 4:1993;529-541.
8. Dickinson M.H., Lighton J.R.B. Muscle efficiency and elastic storage in the flight motor of Drosophila. Science. 268:1995;87-90.
9. Fry S.N., Bichsel M., Müller P., Robert D. Tracking of flying insects using pan-tilt cameras. J. Neurosci. Methods. 101:2000;59-67.
10. Fry S.N., Sayaman R., Dickinson M.H. The aerodynamics of free-flight maneuvers in Drosophila. Science. 300:2003;495-498.
11. Frye M.A., Dickinson M.H. Fly flight: a model for the neural control of complex behavior. Neuron. 32:2001;385-388.
12. Frye M.A., Dickinson M.H. A signature of salience in the Drosophila brain. Nat. Neurosci. 6:2003;544-546.
13. Frye M.A., Tarsitano M., Dickinson M.H. Odor localization requires visual feedback during free flight in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Exp. Biol. 206:2003;843-855.
14. Giles J. Think like a bee. Nature. 410:2001;510-512.
15. Göpfert M.C., Stocker H., Robert D. Drosophila atonal is required for the formation of both the neural and exoskeletal components that transform fly antennae into ears. Zoology (Jena). 105:2002;77.
16. Götz K.G. Optomotorische Untersuchung des visuellen Systems einiger Augenmutanten der Fruchtfliege Drosophila. Kybernetik. 2:1964;77-92.
17. Götz K.G. Flight control in Drosophila by visual perception of motion. Kybernetik. 4:1968;199-208.
18. Heide G., Götz K.G. Optomotor control of course and altitude in Drosophila melanogaster is correlated with distinct activities of at least three pairs of flight steering muscles. J. Exp. Biol. 199:1996;1711-1726.
19. Heisenberg M, Wolf R. Vision in Drosophila: genetics of microbehavior. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo: Springer; 1984.
20. Juusola M., Hardie R.C. Light adaptation in Drosophila photoreceptors. I. Response dynamics and signaling efficiency at 25°C. J. Gen. Physiol. 117:2001;3-25.
21. Land M.F., Collett T.S. Chasing behaviour of houseflies (Fannia canicularis). J. Comp. Physiol. A. 89:1974;331-357.
22. Landis C. Determinants of the critical flicker-fusion threshold. Physiol. Rev. 34:1954;259-286.
23. Lehmann F.O., Dickinson M.H. The changes in power requirements and muscle efficiency during elevated force production in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. J. Exp. Biol. 200:1997;1133-1143.
24. Lehrer M. Locomotion does more than bring the bee to new places. In: Goodman LJ, Fisher RC (Eds.). The behaviour and physiology of bees. Wallingford, England, UK: C.A.B. International; 1991. p. 185-202.
25. Lehrer M. Why do bees turn back and look? J. Comp. Physiol. A. 172:1993;549-563.
26. Lindemann J.P., Kern R., Michaelis C., Meyer P., Van Hateren J.H., Egelhaaf M. FliMax, a novel stimulus device for panoramic and highspeed presentation of behaviourally generated optic flow. Vision Res. 43:2003;779-791.
27. Mayer M., Vogtmann K., Bausenwein B., Wolf R., Heisenberg M. Flight control during 'free yaw turns' in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 163:1988;389-399.
28. Müller P., Robert R. A shot in the dark: the silent quest of a free-flying phonotactic fly. J. Exp. Biol. 204:2001;1039-1052.
29. Nolen T.G., Hoy R.R. Phonotaxis in flying crickets. I. Attraction to the calling song and avoidance of bat-like ultrasound are discrete behaviours. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 159:1986;423-439.
30. Packer O., Diller L.C., Verweij J., Lee B.B., Pokorny J., Williams D.R., Dacey D.M., Brainard D.H. Characterization and use of a digital light projector for vision research. Vision Res. 41:2001;427-439.
31. Ramsauer N., Robert D. Free-flight phonotaxis in a parasitoid fly: Behavioural thresholds, relative attraction and susceptibility to noise. Naturwissenschaften. 87:2000;315-319.
32. Reichardt W., Wenking H. Optical detection and fixation of objects by fixed flying flies. Naturwissenschaften. 56:1969;424-425.
33. Reynolds D.R., Riley J.R. Remote-sensing, telemetric and computer-based technologies for investigating insect movement: a survey of existing and potential techniques. Comput. Electron. Agric. 35:2002;271-307.
34. Robert D. The auditory behaviour of flying locusts. J. Exp. Biol. 147:1989;279-302.
35. Robert D., Rowell C.H.F. Locust flight steering. I. Head movements and the organization of correctional manoeuvres. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 171:1992a;41-51.
36. Robert D., Rowell C.H.F. Locust flight steering. II. Acoustic avoidance manoeuvres and associated head movements compared with correctional steering. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 171:1992b;53-62.
37. Schenato L, Deng X, Sastry S. Hovering flight for a micromechanical flying insect: modeling and robust control synthesis. In: 15th IFAC World Congress on Automatic Control; 2002.
38. Schilstra C., Van Hateren J.H. Blowfly flight and optic flow. I. Thorax kinematics and flight dynamics. J. Exp. Biol. 202:1999;1481-1490.
39. Schuster S., Strauss R., Götz K.G. Virtual-reality techniques resolve the visual cues used by fruit flies to evaluate object distances. Curr. Biol. 12:2002;1591-1594.
40. Sherman A., Dickinson M.H. A comparison of visual and haltere-mediated equilibrium reflexes in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. J. Exp. Biol. 206:2003;295-302.
41. Stark W.S., Johnson M. Microspectrophotometry of Drosophila visual pigments: determinations of conversion efficiency in R1-6 receptors. J. Comp. Physiol. 140:1980;275-286.
42. Straw AD, O'Carroll DC. Motion blur applied to eliminate artifacts in apparent motion displays (Abstract, Vision Science Society 2003 Annual Meeting) J Vis 3;2003:782a.
43. Tammero L.F., Dickinson M.H. Collision-avoidance and landing responses are mediated by separate pathways in the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster. J. Exp. Biol. 205:2002;2758-2798.
44. Tatler B., O'Carroll D.C., Laughlin S.B. Temperature and the temporal resolving power of fly photoreceptors. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 186:2000;399-407.
45. Taylor G.K. Mechanics and aerodynamics of insect flight control. Biol. Rev. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 76:2001;449-471.
46. Voss R., Zeil J. Active vision in insects: an analysis of object-directed zig-zag flights in wasps (Odynerus spinipes, Eumenidae). J. Comp. Physiol. A. 182:1998;377-387.
47. Walker T.J., Wineriter S.A. Hosts of a phonotactic parasitoid and levels of parasitism (Diptera: Tachinidae: Ormia ochracea). Fla. Entomol. 74:1991;554-559.
48. Wehner R. Spatial vision in arthropods, Handbook of sensory physiology. VII/6C. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo: Springer; 1981. p. 287-616.
49. Wehner R. Arthropods. In: Papi F, editor. Animal homing. Chapman & Hall; 1992. p. 45-144.
50. Wolf R., Voss A., Hein S., Heisenberg M. Can a fly ride a bicycle? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., Ser. B: Biol. Sci. 337:1992;261-269.
51. Zeil J. The control of optic flow during learning flights. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 180:1997;25-37.