School-based early intervention and child well-being in the Chicago longitudinal study

Child Welfare

Volumn 82, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 633-656

  Reynolds, Arthur J ^a   Temple, Judy A ^b   Ou, Suh Ruu ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILD ABUSE; CHILD WELFARE; EARLY CHILDHOOD INTERVENTION; ECONOMICS; EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; PARENT; PRESCHOOL CHILD; SCHOOL HEALTH SERVICE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHICAGO; CHILD; CHILD ABUSE; CHILD WELFARE; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; EARLY INTERVENTION (EDUCATION); EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PARENTS; SCHOOL HEALTH SERVICES; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 1542577975     PISSN: 00094021     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Barnett, W. S. (1995). Long-term effects of early childhood programs on cognitive and school outcomes. Future of Children, 5(3), 25-50.
2. Campbell, F. A., & Ramey, C. T. (1995). Cognitive and school outcomes for high risk African-American students at middle adolescence: Positive effects of early intervention. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 743-772.
3. Chicago Longitudinal Study. (1999). Chicago Longitudinal Study: User's guide (Vol. 6). Madison, WI: Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin.
4. Consortium for Longitudinal Studies. (1983). As the twig is bent...lasting effects of preschool programs. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Courtney, M. E. (1998). The costs of child protection in the context of welfare reform. Future of Children, 8(1), 88-103.
6. Daro, D., & McCurdy, K. (1994). Preventing child abuse and neglect: Programmatic interventions. Child Welfare, 73, 405-430.
7. Guterman, N. B. (1999). Enrollment strategies in early home visitation to prevent child physical abuse and neglect and the "universal versus targeted" debate: A meta-analysis of population-based and screening-based programs. Child Abuse & Neglect, 23, 863-890.
8. Heckman, J. (2000). Policies to foster human capital. Research in Economics, 54, 3-56.
9. Karoly, L. A., Greenwood, P. W., Everingham, S. S., et al. (1998). Investing in our children: What we know and don't know about the costs and benefits of early childhood interventions. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
10. MacLeod, J., & Nelson, G. (2000). Programs for the promotion of family wellness and the prevention of child maltreatment: A meta-analytic review. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24, 1127-1149.
11. National Science and Technology Council. (1997, April). Investing in our future: A national research initiative for America's children for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President, Office of Science and Technology Policy, Committee on Fundamental Science, and the Committee on Health, Safety, and Food.
12. Olds, D. L., Eckenrode, J., Henderson, C. R., et al. (1997). Long-term effects of home visitation on maternal life course and child abuse and neglect. Fifteen-year follow-up of a randomized trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 278, 637-643.
13. Reynolds, A. J. (2000). Success in early intervention: The Chicago Child-Parent Centers. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
14. Reynolds, A. J., Ou, S., & Topitzes, J. W. (2002). Paths of effects of early intervention on educational attainment and juvenile arrest: A confirmatory analysis of the Chicago Child-Parent Centers. Unpublished manuscript.
15. Reynolds, A. J., & Robertson, D. L. (2003). School-based early children intervention and later maltreatment in the Chicago Longitudinal Study. Child Development, 74, 3-26.
16. Reynolds, A. J., Temple, J. A., Robertson, D. L., & Mann, E. A. (2001). Long-term effects of an early childhood intervention on educational achievement and juvenile arrest: A 15-year follow-up of low-income children in public schools. Journal of American Medical Association, 285(18), 2339-2346.
17. Reynolds, A. J., Temple, J. A., Robertson, D. L., & Mann, E. A. (2002). Age 21 cost-benefit analysis of the Title I Chicago Child-Parent Centers. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 267-303.
18. Reynolds, A. J., Wang, M. C., & Walberg, H. J. (Eds.). (2003). Early childhood programs for a new century. Washington, DC: CWLA Press.
19. Richmond, J. B. (1997). Head Start, A retrospective view: The founders; Section 3: The early administrators. In E. Zigler & J. Valentine (Eds.), Project Head Start: A legacy of the war on poverty (2nd ed., pp. 120-128). Alexandria, VA: National Head Start Association.
20. Schweinhart, L. J., Barnes, H. V., & Weikart, D. P. (1993). Significant benefits: The High-Scope Perry Preschool study through age 27. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Press.
21. Sullivan, L. M. (1971). Let us not underestimate the children. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
22. U. S. General Accounting Office. (2000). Title I preschool education: More children served but gauging effect on school readiness unclear (Report No. HEHS-00-171). Washington, DC: Author.
23. White House. (2003, February). Head Start policy book. Washington, DC: Office of the President. Retrieved July 11, 2003, from http://www.whitehouse. gov/infocus/earlychildhood/hspolicybook/hs_policy_book.pdf.
24. Zigler, E., & Styfco, S. J. (1993). Head Start and beyond: A national plan for extended childhood intervention. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
25. Zigler, E., Taussig, C., & Black, K. (1992). Early childhood intervention: A promising preventive for juvenile delinquency. American Psychologist, 47, 997-1006.