Detecting the liars

Psychologist

Volumn 14, Issue 11, 2001, Pages 596-598

  Vrij, Aldert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 7044272898     PISSN: 09528229     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Akehurst, L. Köhnken, G., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (1996). Lay persons' and police officers' beliefs regarding deceptive behaviour. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 461-471.
2. Anderson, D. E., DePaulo, B. M., Ansfield, M. E., Tickle, J. J., & Green, E. (1999). Beliefs about cues to deception: Mindless stereotypes or untapped wisdom? Journal of Nonverbol Behaviour, 23, 67-89.
3. Buller, O. B., Strzyzewski, K. D., & Hunsaker, F. G. (1991). Interpersonal deception II: The inferiority of conversational participants as deception detectors. Communication Monographs, 58, 25-40.
4. Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Dexter, H. R. (1990). Juror sensitivity to eyewitness identification evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 185-191.
5. Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Stuve, T. E. (1988). Juror decision making in eyewitness identification cases. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 41-55.
6. DePaulo, B. M. (1994). Spotting lies: Can humans learn to do better? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 83-86.
7. DePaulo, B. M., Charlton, K., Cooper, H., Lindsay, J. L., & Muhlenbruck, L. (1997). The accuracy-confidence correlation in the detection of deception. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 346-357.
8. DePaulo, B. M., & Pfeifer, R. L. (1986). On-the-job experience and skill at detecting deception. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 249-267.
9. Ekman, P., & O'Sullivan, M. (1991). Who can catch a liar? American Psychologist, 46, 913-920.
10. Ekman, P., O'Sullivan, M., & Frank, M. G. (1999). A few can catch a liar. Psychological Science, 10, 263-266.
11. Feeley, T. H., & deTurck, M.A. (1997, May), Perceptions of communication as seen by the actor and as seen by the observer:The case of lie detection. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Annual Conference. Montreal, Canada.
12. Feeley, T. H. & Young, M. J. (1999). Self reported cues about deceptive and truthful communication:The effects of cognitive capacity and communication veracity. Manuscript submitted for publication.
13. Granhag, P. A., & Strömwall, L. A. (2001). Detection deception based on repeated interrogations. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 6, 85-101.
14. Hurd, K., & Noller, P. (1988). Decoding deception: A look at the process. Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour, 12, 217-133.
15. Inbau, F. E., Reid, J. E., & Buckley, J. P. (1986). Criminal interrogation and confessions (3rd edition). Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wlikins.
16. Kassin, S. M. & Fong, C. T. (1999). 'I'm innocent!': Effects of training on judgments of truth and deception in the interrogation room. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 499-516.
17. Levine, T. R., & McCornack, S. A. (1992). Linking love and lies:A formal test of Ath McCornack and Parks model of deception detection. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9, 143-154.
18. Lindsay, R. C. L. (1994). Expectations of eyewitness performance: jurors' verdicts do not follow from their beliefs. In D. F. Ross, J. D. Read & M. P. Toglia (Eds.),Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp. 362-284). New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098-2109.
20. Vrij, A. (2000). Detecting lies and deceit:The psychology of lying and the implications for professional practice. Chichester: Wiley.
21. Vrij A. & Baxter, M. (2000). Accuracy and confidence in detecting truths and lies in elaborations and denials: Truth bias, lie bias and individual differences. Expert Evidence: The International Digest of Human Behaviour, Science and Law, 7, 25-36.
22. Vrij, A., Edward, K., & Bull, R. (2001). Police officers' ability to detect deceit:The benefit of indirect deception detection measures. Legal and Criminoligical Psychology, 6, 185-197.
23. Vrij, A., & Graham, S. (1997). Individual differences between liars and the ability to detect lies. Expert Evidence: The International Digest of Human Behaviour, Science and Law, 5, 144-148.
24. Vrij, A., Harden, F., Jerry, J., Edward, K., & Bull, R. (2001). The influence of personal characteristics, stakes and lie complexity on the accuracy and confidence to detect deceit. In R. Roesch, R. R. Corrado & R. J. Dempster (Eds.), Psychology in the courts: International advances in knowledge. (pp.289-304).Amsterdam: Harwood Academic.
25. Vrij, A., & Mann, S. (2001). Who killed my relative? Police officers' ability to detect real-life high state lies. Psychology, Crime and Law, 7, 119-132.
26. Vrij, A., & Semin, G. R. (1996). Lie experts' beliefs about nonverbal indicators of deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour, 20, 65-80.