The Role of the Laboratory in Science Learning

Elementary School Journal

Volumn 97, Issue 4, 1996, Pages

  Linn, Marcia C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1542535086     PISSN: 00135984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Atkinson, R. C. (Ed.). (1964). Studies in mathematical psychology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
2. Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229-270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
3. Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. New York: Norton.
4. Bruner, J. S. (1968). Processes of cognitive growth: Infancy. Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.
5. Burbules, N. C., & Linn, M. C. (1988). Response to contradiction: Scientific reasoning during adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(1), 67-75.
6. Burbules, N. C., & Linn, M. C. (1991). Science education and the philosophy of science: Congruence or contradiction? International Journal of Science Education, 13(3), 227-241.
7. Calfee, R. (1981). Cognitive psychology and educational practice. In D. C. Berliner (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 9, pp. 3-73). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
8. Champagne, A. B., Klopfer, L. E., & Gunstone, R. F. (1982). Cognitive research and the design of science instruction. Educational Psychologist, 17(1), 31-53.
9. Clement, J. (1982). Students' preconceptions in introductory mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 50(1), 66-71.
10. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator, 15(3), 6-11, 38-39.
11. Commission on Science Education. (1964). Science - a process approach: Commentary for teachers, Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
12. Cunningham, H. A. (1924). Laboratory methods in natural science teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 24, 709-715, 848-851.
13. Cunningham, H. A. (1946). Lecture method versus individual laboratory method in science teaching: A summary. Science Education, 30, 70-82.
14. Cureton, E. E. (1927). Junior high school science. School Review, 35, 767-775.
15. Curtis, F. D. (1926). A digest of investigations in the teaching of science in the elementary and secondary schools. York, PA: Maple Press Co.
16. Curtis, F. D. (1931). Second digest of investigations in the teaching of science. York, PA: Maple Press Co.
17. diSessa, A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2-3), 105-225.
18. Driver, R. (1981). Pupils' alternative frameworks in science. European Journal of Science Education, 3, 93-101.
19. Driver, R. (1989). Students' conceptions and the learning of science [Special issue]. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 481-490.
20. Eckert, P. (1990). Adolescent social categories: Information and science learning. In M. Gardner, J. G. Greeno, F. Reif, A. H. Schoenfeld, A. diSessa, & E. Stage (Eds.), Toward a scientific practice of science education (pp. 203-218). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Eylon, B. S., & Linn, M. C. (1988). Learning and instruction: An examination of four research perspectives in science education. Review of Educational Research, 58(3), 251-301.
22. Gagné, R. (1968). Instructional variables and learning outcomes. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
23. Goldstein, J. S. (1992). A different sort of time: The life of Jerrold R. Zacharias, scientist, engineer, educator. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Jacobson, W. J., & Doran, R. L. (1985). The second International Science Study results. Phi Delta Kappan, 66(6), 414-417.
25. Karplus, R. (1975). Strategies in curriculum development: The SCIS Project. In J. Schaffarzick & D. H. Hampson (Eds.), Strategies for curriculum development (pp. 69-88). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
26. Karplus, R., & Thier, H. D. (1967). A new look at elementary school science: Science Curriculum Improvement Study. Chicago: Rand McNally.
27. Larkin, J. (1983). The role of problem representation in physics. In D. Genter & A. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (p. 75). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Larkin, J. H., & Reif, F. (1979). Understanding and teaching problem solving in physics. European Journal of Science Education, 1, 191-203.
29. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
30. Lawson, A. E. (1983). Predicting science achievement: The role of developmental level, disembedding ability, mental capacity, prior knowledge and beliefs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(2), 117-129.
31. Lawson, A. E. (1985). A review of research on formal reasoning and science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22, 569-617.
32. Linn, M. C. (1980). Teaching children to control variables: Some investigations using free choice experiences. In S. Modgil & C. Modgil (Eds.), Toward a theory of psychological development within the Piagetian framework (pp. 673-697). Windsor, Berkshire: National Foundation for Educational Research.
33. Linn, M. C. (1983). Content, context, and process in adolescent reasoning. Journal of Early Adolescence, 3, 63-82.
34. Linn, M. C. (1986). Science. In R. Dillon & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Cognition and instruction (pp. 155-204). New York: Academic Press.
35. Linn, M. C. (1992). The computer as learning partner: Can computer tools teach science? In K. Sheingold, L. G. Roberts, & S. M. Malcolm (Eds.), This year in school science 1991: Technology for teaching and learning (pp. 31-69). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
36. Linn, M. C. (in press). From separation to partnership in science education: Students, laboratories, and the curriculum. In R. Tinker & T. Ellermeijer (Eds.), NATO advanced research workshop on microcomputer based labs: Educational research and standards. Brussels: Springer-Verlag.
37. Linn, M. C., & Clark, H. C. (1995). How can assessment practices foster problem solving? In D. R. Lavoie (Ed.), Towards a cognitive-science perspective for scientific problem solving [NARST Monograph] (Vol. 6, pp. 142-180). Manhattan, KS: National Association for Research in Science Teaching.
38. Linn, M. C., Clement, C., & Pulos, S. (1983). Is it formal if it's not physics? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(8), 755-770.
39. Linn, M. C., diSessa, A., Pea, R. D., & Songer, N. B. (1994). Can research on science learning and instruction inform standards for science education? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 3(1), 7-15.
40. Linn, M. C., & Peterson, R. W. (1973). The effect of direct experience with objects on middle class, culturally diverse, and visually impaired young children. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 10, 83-90.
41. Linn, M. C., & Songer, N. B. (1991). Cognitive and conceptual change in adolescence. American Journal of Education, 99(4), 379-417.
42. Linn, M. C., Songer, N. B., & Eylon, B. S. (1996). Shifts and convergences in science learning and instruction. In R. Calfee & D. Berliner (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 438-490). Riverside, NJ: Macmillan.
43. McDermott, L. C. (1984). Research on conceptual understanding in mechanics. Physics Today, 37, 24-32.
44. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
45. Millikan, R. A., Gale, H. G., & Davis, I. C. (1925). Exercises in laboratory physics for secondary schools. Boston, MA: Ginn.
46. Papert, S. A. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic.
47. Pea, R. D. (1992). Augmenting the discourse of learning with computer-based learning environments. In E. De Corte, M. C. Linn, H. Mandl, & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Computer-based learning environments and problem solving (pp. 313-343). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
48. Physical Science Study Committee. (1957). First annual report of the Physical Science Study Committee. Boston: Massachusetts Institute of Technology/National Science Foundation.
49. Physical Science Study Committee. (1960). Physics. Boston, MA: Heath.
50. Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: National Universities Press.
51. Raizen, S. A. (1991). The state of science education. In S. K. Majumdar, L. M. Rosenfeld, P. A. Rubba, E. W. Miller, & R. F. Schmalz (Eds.), Science education in the United States: Issues, crises and priorities (pp. 25-45). Philadelphia: Pennsylvania Academy of Science.
52. Rossiter, M. W. (1982). Women scientists in America: Struggles and strategies to 1940. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
53. Salinger, G. L. (1991). The materials of physics instruction [Special issue: Precollege education]. Physics Today, 44(9), 39-45.
54. Shulman, L. S., & Tamir, P. (1973). Research on teaching in the natural sciences. In R. M. W. Travers (Ed.), Second handbook of research on teaching (pp. 1098-1148). Chicago: Rand McNally.
55. Soloway, E., & Ehrlich, K. (1984). Empirical studies of programming knowledge. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 10(5), 595-609.
56. Thorndike, E. L. (1910). The contribution of psychology to education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1, 1-14.
57. Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20, 158-177.
58. Welch, W. W. (1979). Twenty years of science curriculum development: A look back. In D. C. Berliner (Ed.), Review of research in education (pp. 282-308). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
59. West, L. H. T., & Pines, A. L. (Eds.). (1985). Cognitive structure and conceptual change. New York: Academic Press.
60. White, B. Y. (1993). ThinkerTools: Causal models, conceptual change, and science education. Cognition and Instruction, 10(1), 1-100.
61. White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1990). Causal model progressions as a foundation for intelligent learning environments. Artificial Intelligence, 24(1), 99-157.
62. White, R. T. (in press). Improving the teaching and learning of science in the post-compulsory years. In P. J. Fensham (Ed.), Science and technological education in Australia. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.