Political methodology: A welcoming discipline

Journal of the American Statistical Association

Volumn 95, Issue 450, 2000, Pages 651-654

  Beck, Nathaniel L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1542426914     PISSN: 01621459     EISSN: 1537274X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2000.10474244     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Achen, C. (1983), “Towards Theories of Data,” in Political Science: The State of the Discipline, ed. A. Finifter, Washington. DC: American Political Science Association, pp. 69 93.
2. Achen, C. (1985), “Editoral” Political Methodology, 11.
3. Bartels, L., and Brady, H. (1993), “The State of Quantitative Political Methodology.” in Political Science: The State of the Discipline II, ed. A Finifter. Washington. DC: American Political Science Association, pp. 121-159.
4. Beck, N., and Jackman, S. (1998). “Beyond Linearity by Default: Generalized Additive Models.” American Journal of Political Science, 42. 596-627.
5. Beck, N., and Katz, J. N. (1995), “What to do (and not to do) With Times Series Cross Section Data.” American Political Science Review, 89. 634-647.
6. Beck, N., Katz, J. N., and Tucker, R. (1998). “Taking Time Seriously: Time Scries-Cross-Section Analysis With a Binary Dependent Variable,” American Journal of Political Science, 42, 1260-1288.
7. Beck, N., King, G. M., and Zcng, L. (2000), “Improving Quantitative Studies of International Conflict: A Conjecture” American Political Science Review, 94. 21-35.
8. Dahl, R. (1961), “The Behavioral Approach in Political Science: Epitaph for a Monument to a Successful Protest,” American Political Science Review, 55, 763-772.
9. Geddes, B. (1990), “How the Cases You Choose Affect the Answers You Get: Selection Bias tn Comparative Politics.” Political Analysis, 2. 131-150.
10. Goodman, L. (1953). “Ecological Regressions and the Behavior of Individuals,” American Sociological Review. 18, 663-666.
11. Gow, D. J. (1985), “Quantification and Statistics in the Early Years of American Political Science, 1880-1922.” Political Methodology, 11, 1-18.
12. Hastie, T. J., and Tibshirani, R. J. (1990). Generalized Additive Models, New York: Chapman and Hall.
13. Herron, M. C. (2000). “Post-Estimation Uncertainty in Limited Dependent Variable Models,” Political Analysis, 8. 83-98.
14. Jackman, S. (2000). “Estimation and Inference via Bayesian Simulation: An Introduction to Markov Chain Monte Carlo.” American Journal of Political Science. 44. 375-404.
15. Johnston, R., Blais, A., Brady, H. E., and Crete, J. (1992), Letting the People Decide: Dynamics of a Canadian Election, Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
16. King, G. (1998). A Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17. King, G., Honaker, J., Joseph, A., and Schcvc, K, (1998), “Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation,” unpublished paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the American Political Science Association. Boston.
18. King, G., Keohane, R. O., and Verba, S. (1994). Designing Social Inquiry, Princeton. NJ: Princeton University Press.
19. King, G., Tomz, M., and Wittenberg, J. (2000), “Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation,” American Journal of Political Science. 44, 341-355.
20. Little, R. J. A., and Rubin D. B. (1987). Statistical Analysis With Missing Data. New York: Wiley.
21. Petty, W. (1690). Political Arithmetick, London: Robert Clavcl and Hen. Mortlock.
22. Robinson, W. S. (1950), “Ecological Correlation and the Behavior of Individuals.” American Sociological Review. 15. 351-357.
23. Rubin, D. R. (1981), “Estimation in Parallel Randomized Experiments,” Journal of Educational Statistics, 6. 377-400.
24. Sniderman, P. M., Brody, R. A., and Tctlock, P. E. (1991). Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology, New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. Western, B. (1998). “Causal Heterogeneity in Comparative Research: A Bayesian Hierarchical Modelling Approach.” American Journal of Political Science. 42, 1233-1259.