Short-term and long-term frames of reference in category judgments: A multiple-standards model

Psychophysics Beyond Sensation: Laws and Invariants of Human Cognition

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 45-68

  Petzold, Peter ^a   Haubensak, Gert ^a  

^a JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862046818     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410610744     Document Type: Chapter

References (33)

1. Baird, J.C. (1997). Sensation and judgment: Complementarity theory of psychophysics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Baird, J. C, Green, D.M., & Luce, R.D. (1980). Variability and sequential effects in cross modality matching of area and loudness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 277-289.
3. DeCarlo, L.T. (1989). Sequential effects in magnitude scaling (Doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Stony Brook, 1989). Dissertation Abstracts International, 50, 3730B.
4. DeCarlo, L.T. (1994). A dynamic theory of proportional judgment: Context and judgment of length, heaviness, and roughness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 372-381.
5. DeCarlo, L.T., & Cross, D.V. (1990). Sequential effects in magnitude scaling: Models and theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 375-396.
6. Durlach, N.I., & Braida, L.D. (1969). Intensity perception: Prelimary theory of intensity resolution. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 46, 372-383.
7. Green, D.M., Luce, R.D., & Duncan, J.E. (1977). Variability and sequential effects in magnitude production and estimation of auditory intensity. Perception & Psychophysics, 22, 450-456.
8. Haubensak, G. (1992). The consistency model: A process model for absolute judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 303-309.
9. Hinz, A., & Geissler, H.-G. (1990). The influence of class membership of stimuli on judgment, In H.-G. Geissler (Ed.), Psychophysical explorations of mental structures (pp. 124-129). Toronto: Hogrefe.
10. Jesteadt, W., Luce, R.D., & Green, D.M. (1977). Sequential effects in judgments of loudness. Journal of the Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 92-104.
11. Luce, R.D., & Green, D.M. (1974). The response ratio hypothesis for magnitude estimation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 11, 1-14.
12. Luce, R.D., & Green, D.M. (1978). Two tests of the neural attention hypothesis for auditory psychophysics. Perception & Psychophysics, 23, 363-371.
13. Marley, A.A.J., & Cook, V.T. (1984). A fixed rehearsal capacity interpretation of limits on absolute identification performance. British Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 37, 136-151.
14. Marley, A.A.J., & Cook, V.T. (1986). A limited capacity rehearsal model for psychophysical judgment applied to magnitude estimation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 30, 339-390.
15. Marks, L.E. (1988). Magnitude estimation and sensory matching. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 511-526.
16. McGill, W.J. (1957). Serial effects in auditory threshold judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 297-303.
17. Mori, S. (1998). Effects of stimulus information and number of stimuli on sequential dependencies in absolute identification. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52, 72-83.
18. Mori, S., & Ward, L.M. (1995). Pure feedback effects in absolute identification. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 1065-1079.
19. Parducci, A. (1965). Category judgment: A range-frequency model. Psychological Review, 2, 407-418.
20. Parducci, A., Knobel, S., & Thomas, Ch. (1976). Independent contexts for category ratings: A rangefrequency analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 20, 360-366.
21. Petzold, P. (1981). Distance effects on sequential dependencies in categorical judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 1371-1385.
22. Petzold, P. (1982). The edge effect of discriminability in categorical judgments, In H.-G. Geissler & P. Petzold (Eds.), Psychophysical judgment and the process of perception (pp. 222-232). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
23. Petzold, P, & Haubensak, G. (200la). Higher order sequential effects. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 969-978.
24. Petzold, P, & Haubensak, G. (2001b). The influence of category membership of stimuli on sequential effects. Perception & Psychophysics, Manuscript under review.
25. Schifferstein, H.N.J., & Frijters, J.E.R. (1992). Contextual and sequential effects on judgments of sweetness intensity. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 243-255.
26. Torgerson, W.S. (1958). Theory and methods of scaling. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. Treisman, M. (1984). A theory of criterion setting: An alternative to the attention band and response ratio hypotheses in magnitude estimation and cross modality matching. Journal of the Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 443-463.
28. Treisman, M., & Williams, T.C. (1984). A theory of criterion setting with an application to sequential dependencies. Psychological Review, 91, 68-111.
29. Volkmann, J. (1951). Scales of judgment and their implications for social psychology, In J.H. Rohrer & M. Sherif (Eds.), Social psychology at the crossroads (pp. 279-294). New York: Harper & Row.
30. Ward, L.M. (1979). Stimulus information and sequential dependencies in magnitude estimation and cross-modality matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 444-459.
31. Ward, L.M. (1990). Critical bands and mixed frequency scaling: Sequential dependencies, equalloudness contours, and power function exponents. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 551-562.
32. Ward, L.M., & Lockhead, G.R. (1971). Response system processes in absolute judgment. Perception & Psychophysics, 9, 73-78.
33. Witte, W. (1975). Zum Gestalt- und Systemcharakter psychischer Bezugssysteme [About psychological frames of reference as Gestalt and Systems], In S. Ertel (Ed.), Gestalttheorie in der modernen Psychologie [The theory of Gestalt in modern Psychology] (pp. 123-154). Darmstadt, Germany: Steinkopf.