Position-invariant neural network for digital pavement crack analysis

Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 105-118

  Lee, Byoung Jik ^a   Lee, Hosin David ^b  

^a WESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRACKS; HIGHWAY ENGINEERING; IMAGING TECHNIQUES; INVARIANCE; NEURAL NETWORKS;

IMAGE-BASED NEURAL NETWORK; LEARNING COEFFICIENTS;

COMPUTER AIDED ENGINEERING;

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; CRACKING; IMAGING METHOD; PAVEMENT;

EID: 1542347673     PISSN: 10939687     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8667.2004.00341.x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Cheng, H. D., Jiang, X. H. & Glazier, C. (2001), Novel approach to pavement cracking detection based on neural network, Transportation Research Board, No. 1764, 119-27.
2. FHWA (1989), Federal-Aid Highway Program Manual. Vol. 6, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington DC.
3. FHWA (1991), An Advance Course in Pavement Management Systems. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington DC.
4. Gonzalez, R. C. & Woods, R. (1987), Digital Image Processing 2nd edn., Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. Inc., Menlo Park, CA.
5. Guralnick, S. A., Sun, E. S. & Smith, C. (1993), Automating inspection of highway pavement surface, Journal of Transportation Engineering, 119(1), 1-12.
6. Haralick, R. M. & Shapiro, L. G. (1985), Image segmentation techniques, Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 29, 100-32.
7. Hertz, J., Krogh, A. & Palmer, R. (1991), Introduction to the Theory of Neural Computation. vol. 1, Santa Fe Institute, Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA.
8. Huang, Y. H. (1993), Pavement Analysis and Design. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
9. Hudson, S. W., Hudson, W. R. & Carmichael, R. F. (1992), Minimum requirements for standard pavement management systems, Pavement Management Implementation, STP 1121, ASTM, 19-31, Philadelphia.
10. Jitprasithsiri, S., Lee, H. & Sorcic, R. G. (1996), Development of digital image processing algorithm to compute a unified crack index for Salt Lake City, Transportation Research Record, No. 1526, 142-8.
11. Kaseko, M. S. & Ritchie, S. G. (1993), A neural network-based methodology for pavement crack detection and classification, Transportation Research-C, 1(4), 75-291.
12. Luhr, D. R. (1999), A proposed methodology to quantify and verify automated crack survey measurements, Presented at the 78th Annual TRB Meeting, Washington, DC.
13. Owusu-Ababio, S. (1998), Effect of neural network topology on flexible pavement cracking prediction, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 13(5), 349-55.
14. Roberts, C. A. & Attoh-Okine, N. O. (1998), A comparative analysis of two artificial neural networks using pavement performance prediction, Computer Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 13(5), 339-48.
15. Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E. & Williams, R. J. (1986), Learning internal representation by error propagation, Parallel Distributed Processing, 1, 318-62.
16. Senouci, A. B. & Eldin, N. N. (1995), A pavement condition-rating model using back-propagation neural networks, Microcomputers in Civil Engineering, 10, 433-441.
17. SHRP-P-338, Distress Identification Manual for the Long-Term Pavement Performance Project, Strategic Highway Research Program, National Research Council, Washington DC.