A Comparative Analysis of Two Artificial Neural Networks Using Pavement Performance Prediction

Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 339-348

  Roberts, Craig A ^a   Attoh Okine, Nii O ^b  

^a Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

^b FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED ENGINEERING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASE SYSTEMS; FEEDFORWARD NEURAL NETWORKS; FORECASTING; LEARNING SYSTEMS; PAVEMENTS; PERFORMANCE; SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

DOT PRODUCT ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; QUADRATIC FUNCTION ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK;

NEURAL NETWORKS;

EID: 0032165135     PISSN: 10939687     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0885-9507.00112     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Attoh-Okine, N. O., Analysis of learning and momentum term in backpropagation neural network algorithm trained to predict pavement performance, presented at the 74th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, January 1995.
2. Attoh-Okine, N. O., Predicting roughness progression in flexible pavements using artificial neural networks, in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Managing Pavements, San Antonio, TX, vol. 1, 1994, pp. 55-62.
3. Butt, A. A., Shahin, M. Y., Feighan, K. J. & Carpenter, S. H., Pavement performance prediction model using the Markov process, Transportation Research Record 1123, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC. 1987, pp. 12-19.
4. Carey, W. N., Jr. & Irick, P. E., The pavement serviceability-performance concept, in Bulletin 250, HRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1960, pp. 40-58.
5. Cogger, K. O., A learning paradigm for neural network architecture, working paper no. 237, School of Business, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, 1992.
6. Faghri, A. & Hua, J., Evaluation of artificial neural network applications in transportation engineering, in Transportation Research Record 1358, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1992, pp. 71-80.
7. Fanning, K. M. & Cogger, K. O., A comparative analysis of artificial neural networks using financial distress prediction, working paper no. 241, School of Business, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, 1993.
8. Fwa, T. F. & Chan, W. T., Priority rating of highway maintenance needs by neural networks, Journal of Transportation Engineering, 119 (3) (1993), 419-32.
9. Haas, R., Hudson, W. R. & Zaniewski, J., Modern Pavement Management, Krieger Publishing Company, Malabar, FL, 1994.
10. Hewitson, B. C. & Crane, R. G., Neural Nets: Applications in Geography, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1994.
11. Hudson, W. R. & Haas, R., Future directions and need for innovation in pavement management, in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Managing Pavements, San Antonio, TX, vol. 2, 1994, pp. 122-30.
12. Moore, R. K., Clark, G. N. & Plumb, G. N., Present serviceability-roughness correlations using rating panel data, in Transportation Research Record 1117, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1987, pp. 152-8.
13. Thompson, P. D., Making optimization practical in pavement management systems: Lessons from leading-edge projects, in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Managing Pavements, San Antonio, TX, vol. 2, 1994, pp. 184-9.
14. Autonet: Reference Manual, Ver. 2.10, Peak Software Corporation, Denver, CO, 1991.
15. Kansas Department of Transportation Pavement Management System; 1993 Kansas NOS (Network Optimization System) Condition Survey Report. Bureau of Materials and Research, Geotechnical Unit, Kansas Department of Transportation, Kansas City, KS, 1993.
16. Propagator: Neural Network Development Software, User's Manual, Ver. 1.0 for Windows, Ard Corporation, Columbia, MD, 1993.