Herbivory modifies the lifetime fitness response of Arabidopsis thaliana to elevated CO2

Ecology

Volumn 85, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 297-303

  Bidart Bouzat, M Gabriela ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Arabidopsis thaliana; Diamond back moth; Elevated CO2; Genotypic variation; Herbivory; Lifetime fitness; Mouse ear cress; Plant evolutionary responses; Plutella xylostella

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE ENRICHMENT; CLIMATE CHANGE; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FITNESS; PLANT-HERBIVORE INTERACTION;

ANIMALIA; ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA; LEPIDOPTERA; PLUTELLA XYLOSTELLA; PLUTELLIDAE;

EID: 1542319181     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/03-3062     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Agrawal, A. A. 1998. Induced responses to herbivory and increased plant performance. Science 279:1201-1202.
2. Agrawal, A. A. 2001. Transgenerational consequences of plant responses to herbivory: an adaptive maternal effect. American Naturalist 157:555-569.
3. Andalo, C., I. Goldringer, and B. Godelle. 2001. Inter-and intragenotypic competition under elevated carbon dioxide in Arabidopsis thaliana. Ecology 82:157-164.
4. Anderson, V. L., and R. A. McLean. 1974. Design of experiments. Marcel Dekker, New York, New York, USA.
5. Bano, F. A. 1993. Glucosinolates in Arabidopsis. Dissertation. University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
6. Bazin, A., M. Goverde, and A. Erhardt. 2002. Influence of atmospheric carbon dioxide enrichment on induced response and growth compensation after herbivore damage in Lotus corniculatus. Ecological Entomology 27:271-278.
7. Bazzaz, F. A. 1998. Tropical forests in a future climate: changes in the biological diversity and impact on the global carbon cycle. Climatic Change 39:317-336.
8. 2-enriched environments: parallel results from two model systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 92:8161-8165.
9. ., light, and nutrients. Ecology 74:104-112.
10. Berenbaum, M., and P. Feeny. 1981. Toxicity of angular furanocoumarins to swallowtail butterflies: escalation in a co-evolutionary arms race? Science 212:927-929.
11. Burd, M. 1999. Flower number and floral components in ten angiosperm species: an examination of assumptions about trade-offs in reproductive evolution. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 68:579-592.
12. Coley, P. D. 1998. Possible effects of climate change on plant/ herbivore interactions in moist tropical forests. Climatic Change 39:455-472.
13. 2 effects on woody plant mass, form, and physiology. Oecologia 113:299-313.
14. 2 on plant-herbivore interactions: experimental evidence of moderating effects at the community level. Oecologia 117:177-186.
15. 2 environments. Oecologia 87:37-42.
16. Hartnett, D. C. 1990. Size-dependent allocation to sexual and vegetative reproduction in four clonal composites. Oecologia 84:254-259.
17. 2 on five plant-aphid interactions. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 99:87-96.
18. 2 conditions: a meta-analysis of reports on 79 crop and wild species. New Phytologist 156:9-26.
19. Kellomaki, S., and H. Vaisanen. 1997. Modelling the dynamics of the forest ecosystem for climate change studies in the boreal conditions. Ecological Modelling 97:121-140.
20. 2, temperature and nitrogen. Tree Physiology 16:635-642.
21. 2 concentration: interactions with shade and soil nitrogen. Tree Physiology 22:321-329.
22. 2 enrichment. Oecologia 126: 371-379.
23. Louda, S. M., and M. A. Potvin. 1995. Effect of inflorescence-feeding insects on the demography and lifetime fitness of a native plant. Ecology 76:229-245.
24. Mauricio, R., and M. D. Rausher. 1997. Experimental manipulation of putative selective agents provides evidence for the role of natural enemies in the evolution of plant defense. Evolution 51:1435-1444.
25. Mithen, R., J. Clarke, C. Lister, and C. Dean. 1995. Genetics of aliphatic glucosinolates. III. Side chain structure of aliphatic glucosinolates in Arabidopsis thaliana. Heredity 74: 210-215.
26. 2 in field experiments: implications for the future forest. Plant, Cell and Environment 22:683-714.
27. 2 and grazing by Gastrophysa viridula on the physiology and regrowth of Rumex obtusifolius. New Phytologist 133: 605-616.
28. Price, P. W. 1997. Insect ecology. J. Wiley, New York, New York, USA.
29. 2 environment: root and shoot aphids feeding on Cardamine. Oikos 77:326-330.
30. Samson, D. A., and K. S. Werk. 1986. Size-dependent effects in the analysis of reproductive effort in plants. American Naturalist 127:667-680.
31. SAS Institute. 1999. Proc Mixed. Version 8. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.
32. Strong, D. R., L. G. Simberloff, and A. B. Thistle. 1984. Ecological communities: conceptual issues and the evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
33. Talekar, N. S., and A. M. Shelton. 1993. Biology, ecology, and management of the diamondback moth. Annual Review of Entomology 38:275-301.
34. 2. Pages 51-75 in C. Körner and F. A. Bazzaz, editors. Carbon dioxide, populations and communities. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.
35. Via, S., R. Gomulkiewicz, G. De Jong, S. M. Scheiner, C. D. Schlichting, and P. H. Van Tienderen. 1995. Adaptive phenotypic plasticity: consensus and controversy. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10:212-217.
36. 2 concentration. Tree Physiology 20:1019-1028.
37. 2 partial pressure on growth and reproduction of Arabidopsis thaliana from different elevations. Plant Cell and Environment 20:254-260.
38. Westerman, J. M., and M. J. Lawrence. 1970. Genotype-environment interaction and developmental regulation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Heredity 25:609-627.
39. 3 grass from Yellowstone National Park. Oecologia 108:321-327.
40. 2 on the response of Phleum pratense and Poa pratensis to aboveground defoliation and root-feeding nematodes. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162:1275-1282.
41. 2 enrichment in seeds and seedlings of Plantago lanceolata L. Oecologia 66:458-460.
42. 2 - implications for water-limited environments. Plant, Cell and Environment 25: 319-331.
43. 2 enrichment by two genotypes of Arabidopsis thaliana differing in their sensitivity to nutrient availability. Annals of Botany 75:491-499.