Sec61p Contributes to Signal Sequence Orientation According to the Positive-Inside Rule

Molecular Biology of the Cell

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 1470-1478

  Goder, Veit ^a,b   Junne, Tina ^a   Spiess, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN; PROTEIN SEC1P; SIGNAL PEPTIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; DNA FLANKING REGION; ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM; GENETIC CONSERVATION; HYDROPHOBICITY; NONHUMAN; ORIENTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN TARGETING; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SITE DIRECTED MUTAGENESIS;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM; INTRACELLULAR MEMBRANES; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MUTAGENESIS, SITE-DIRECTED; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL; PROTEIN SORTING SIGNALS; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 1542313960     PISSN: 10591524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E03-08-0599     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Andersson, H., and von Heijne, G. (1994). Membrane protein topology: effects of delta mu H+ on the translocation of charged residues explain the 'positive inside' rule. EMBO J. 13, 2267-2272.
2. Beltzer, J.P., Fiedler, K., Fuhrer, C., Geffen, I., Handschin, C., Wessels, H.P., and Spiess, M. (1991). Charged residues are major determinants of the transmembrane orientation of a signal-anchor sequence. J. Biol. Chem. 266, 973-978.
3. Denzer, A.J., Nabholz, C.E., and Spiess, M. (1995). Transmembrane orientation of signal-anchor proteins is affected by the folding state but not the size of the N-terminal domain. EMBO J. 14, 6311-6317.
4. Deshaies, R.J., and Schekman, R. (1987). A yeast mutant defective at an early stage in import of secretory protein precursors into the endoplasmic reticulum. J. Cell Biol. 105, 633-645.
5. Eusebio, A., Friedberg, T., and Spiess, M. (1998). The role of the hydrophobic domain in orienting natural signal sequences within the ER membrane. Exp. Cell Res. 241, 181-185.
6. Finke, K., Plath, K., Panzner, S., Prehn, S., Rapoport, T.A., Hartmann, E., and Sommer, T. (1996). A second trimeric complex containing homologs of the Sec61p complex functions in protein transport across the ER membrane of S. cerevisiae. EMBO J. 15, 1482-1494.
7. Goder, V., and Spiess, M. (2003). Molecular mechanism of signal sequence orientation in the endoplasmic reticulum. EMBO J. 22, 3645-3653.
8. Görlich, D., Prehn, S., Hartmann, E., Kalies, K.U., and Rapoport, T.A. (1992). A mammalian homolog of SEC61p and SECYp is associated with ribosomes and nascent polypeptides during translocation. Cell 71, 489-503.
9. Görlich, D., and Rapoport, T.A. (1993). Protein translocation into proteoliposomes reconstituted from purified components of the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. Cell 75, 615-630.
10. Harley, C.A., Holt, J.A., Turner, R., and Tipper, D.J. (1998). Transmembrane protein insertion orientation in yeast depends on the charge difference across transmembrane segments, their total hydrophobicity, and its distribution. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 24963-24971.
11. Hartmann, E., Rapoport, T.A., and Lodish, H.F. (1989). Predicting the orientation of eukaryotic membrane-spanning proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86, 5786-5790.
12. Heinrich, S.U., Mothes, W., Brunner, J., and Rapoport, T.A. (2000). The Sec61p complex mediates the integration of a membrane protein by allowing lipid partitioning of the transmembrane domain. Cell 102, 233-244.
13. High, S., Andersen, S.S., Görlich, D., Hartmann, E., Prehn, S., Rapoport, T.A., and Dobberstein, B. (1993a). Sec61p is adjacent to nascent type I and type II signal-anchor proteins during their membrane insertion. J. Cell Biol. 121, 743-750.
14. High, S., Martoglio, B., Görlich, D., Andersen, S.S., Ashford, A.J., Giner, A., Hartmann, E., Prehn, S., Rapoport, T.A., Dobberstein, B., et al. (1993b). Site-specific photocross-linking reveals that Sec61p and TRAM contact different regions of a membrane-inserted signal sequence. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 26745-26751.
15. Keenan, R.J., Freymann, D.M., Stroud, R.M., and Walter, P. (2001). The signal recognition particle. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 70, 755-775.
16. Martoglio, B., Hofmann, M.W., Brunner, J., and Dobberstein, B. (1995). The protein-conducting channel in the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum is open laterally toward the lipid bilayer. Cell 81, 207-214.
17. Mothes, W., Jungnickel, B., Brunner, J., and Rapoport, T.A. (1998). Signal sequence recognition in cotranslational translocation by protein components of the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. J. Cell Biol. 142, 355-364.
18. Mothes, W., Prehn, S., and Rapoport, T.A. (1994). Systematic probing of the environment of a translocating secretory protein during translocation through the ER membrane. EMBO J. 13, 3973-3982.
19. Pilon, M., Römisch, K., Quach, D., and Schekman, R. (1998). Sec61p serves multiple roles in secretory precursor binding and translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 3455-3473.
20. Pilon, M., Schekman, R., and Römisch, K. (1997). Sec61p mediates export of a misfolded secretory protein from the endoplasmic reticulum to the cytosol for degradation. EMBO J. 16, 4540-4548.
21. Plath, K., Mothes, W., Wilkinson, B.M., Stirling, C.J., and Rapoport, T.A. (1998). Signal sequence recognition in posttranslational protein transport across the yeast ER membrane. Cell 94, 795-807.
22. Pohlschröder, M., Prinz, W.A., Hartmann, E., and Beckwith, J. (1997). Protein translocation in the three domains of life: variations on a theme. Cell 91, 563-566.
23. Rösch, K., Naeher, D., Laird, V., Goder, V., and Spiess, M. (2000). The topogenic contribution of uncharged amino acids on signal sequence orientation in the endoplasmic reticulum. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 14916-14922.
24. Sakaguchi, M., Tomiyoshi, R., Kuroiwa, T., Mihara, K., and Omura, T. (1992). Functions of signal and signal-anchor sequences are determined by the balance between the hydrophobic segment and the N-terminal charge. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 16-19.
25. Sanders, S.L., Whitfield, K.M., Vogel, J.P., Rose, M.D., and Schekman, R.W. (1992). Sec61p and BiP directly facilitate polypeptide translocation into the ER. Cell 69, 353-365.
26. Spiess, M. (1995). Heads or tails-what determines the orientation of proteins in the membrane. FEBS Lett. 369, 76-79.
27. Tipper, D.J., and Harley, C.A. (2002). Yeast genes controlling responses to topogenic signals in a model transmembrane protein. Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 1158-1174.
28. van Klompenburg, W., Nilsson, I., von Heijne, G., and de Kruijff, B. (1997). Anionic phospholipids are determinants of membrane protein topology. EMBO J. 16, 4261-4266.
29. von Heijne, G. (1986). Net N-C charge imbalance may be important for signal sequence function in bacteria. J. Mol. Biol. 192, 287-290.
30. Wahlberg, J.M., and Spiess, M. (1997). Multiple determinants direct the orientation of signal-anchor proteins: the topogenic role of the hydrophobic signal domain. J. Cell Biol. 137, 555-562.
31. Walter, P., and Johnson, A.E. (1994). Signal sequence recognition and protein targeting to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 10, 87-119.
32. Wessels, H.P., Beltzer, J.P., and Spiess, M. (1991). Analysis of protein topology in the endoplasmic reticulum Methods Cell Biol. 34, 287-302.
33. Wilkinson, B.M., Critchley, A.J., and Stirling, C.J. (1996). Determination of the transmembrane topology of yeast Sec61p, an essential component of the endoplasmic reticulum translocation complex. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 25590-25597.
34. Wilkinson, B.M., Tyson, J.R., and Stirling, C.J. (2001). Ssh1p determines the translocation and dislocation capacities of the yeast endoplasmic reticulum. Dev. Cell 1, 401-409.