Almost optimal adaptive LQ control: SISO case

Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 71-100

  Daams, Jasper ^a   Polderman, Jan Willem ^b  

^a Air Traffic Control the Netherlands (LVNL)   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Adaptive control; Excitation; LQ control; Riccati equation; Stability radius

Indexed keywords

RICCATI EQUATIONS; TIME VARYING NETWORKS;

EXCITATION; LQ CONTROL; OPTIMAL INDIRECT ADAPTIVE CONTROLLER; STABILITY RADIUS;

ADAPTIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS;

EID: 1542311603     PISSN: 09324194     EISSN: 1435568X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s004980200003     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. [AM] B. D. O. Anderson and J. B. Moore. Detectability and stabilizability of time-varying discretetime linear systems. SIAM J. Control Optim., 19:20-32, 1981.
2. [ABP] K. Arent, Y. Boers, and J. W. Polderman. Almost optimal adaptive LQ control: observed state case. In Proc. 34th IEEE Connf. on Decision and Control, pages 2328-2333, New Orleans, LA, 1995.
3. [AMP] K. Arent, I. M. Y. Mareels, and J. W. Polderman. The pole zero cancellation problem in adaptive control: a solution for minimum phase systems by approximate models. Technical Report Memorandum 1175, Dept. of Applied Mathematics, University of Twente, 1993.
4. [B] Y. Boers. Adaptieve lq regelaars met gesloten lus excitatie. Technical Report, Dept. Appl. Math., University of Twente, 1994. Master thesis (in Dutch).
5. [BV] V. Borkar and P. Varaiya. Adaptive control of markov chains, I: Finite parameter set. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 24:953-957, 1979.
6. [C] M. C. Campi. The problem of pole-zero cancellation in transfer function identification and application to adaptive stabilization. Automatica, 32:849-857, 1996.
7. [CDPD] H. F. Chen, T. E. Duncan, and B. Pasik-Duncan. Stochastic adaptive control for continuous time linear systems with quadratic cost. J. Appl. Math. Optim., 34:113-138, 1996.
8. [CG1] H. F. Chen and L. Guo. Optimal adaptive control and consistent parameter estimate for armax model with quadratic cost. SIAM J. Control Optim., 25:845-867, 1987.
9. [CG2] H. F. Chen and L. Guo. Identification and Stochastic Adaptive Control. Birkhäuser, Boston, MA, 1991.
10. [D] J. Daams. Almost optimal adaptive control. Technical Report, Dept. Appl. Math., University of Twente, 1996. Master thesis.
11. [dB] P. T. de Bruin. Adaptieve lq regeling met neutrale zekerheidsequivalentie algoritmes. Technical Report, Dept. Appl. Math., University of Twente, 1992. Master thesis (in Dutch).
12. [GS] G. C. Goodwin and K. S. Sin. Adaptive Filtering Prediction and Control. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1984.
13. [GT] G. H. Goodwin and E. K. Teoh. Persistency of excitation in the presence of possibly unbounded signals. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 30:595-597, 1985.
14. [G] L. Guo. Self-convergence of weighted least-squares with applications to stochastic adaptive control. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 1:79-89, 1996.
15. [HS] W. Hirsch and S. Smale. Differential Equations and Linear Algebra, Academic Press, New York, 1974.
16. [KS1] G. Kreisselmeier and M. C. Smith. Stable adaptive regulation of arbitrary nth-order plants. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 31:299-305, 1986.
17. [K] P. R. Kumar. Simultaneous identification and adaptive control of unknown systems over finite parameter sets. IEEE Tram. Automat. Control, 28:68-76, 1983.
18. [KB] P. R. Kumar and A. Becker. A new family of optimal adaptive controllers. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 27:137-146, 1982.
19. [KL] P. R. Kumar and W. Lin. Optimal adaptive controllers for unknown systems. Linear Algebra Appl., 27:765-774, 1982.
20. [KS2] H. Kwakernaak and R. Sivan. Linear Optimal Control Systems. Wiley, New York, 1972.
21. [L1] Ph. De Larminat. On the stabilizability condition in indirect adaptive control. Automatica, 20:793-795, 1984.
22. [LKS] W. Lin, P. R. Kumar, and T. I. Seidman. Will the self-tuning approach work for general cost criteria? Systems Control Lett., 6:77-86, 1985.
23. [L2] R. Lozano. Singularity-free adaptive pole-placement without resorting to persistency of excitation: detailed analysis for first order systems. Automatica, 28:27-33, 1992.
24. [MP] I. M. Y. Mareels and J. W. Polderman. Adaptive Systems: an Introduction. Birkhäuser, Boston, MA, 1996.
25. [P1] F. M. Pait. Achieving tunability in parameter-adaptive control. Ph.D. thesis, Yale University, 1993.
26. [P2] J. W. Polderman. A note on the structure of two subsets of the parameter space in adaptive control. Systems Control Lett., 7:25-34, 1986.
27. [P3] J. W. Polderman. On the necessity of identifying the true system in adaptive LQ control. Systems Control Lett., 8:87-91, 1986.
28. [P4] J. W. Polderman. Avoiding the non-admissible region of the parameter space in indirect adaptive control algorithms. In Proc. 8th Internat. Conf. on Analysis and Optimization of Systems, pages 822-829, Juan les Pins, France, 1988.
29. [P5] J. W. Polderman. Adaptive Control and Identification: Conflict or Conflux. CWI Tract 67. Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science, Amsterdam, 1989.
30. [P6] J. W. Polderman. Adaptive Iq control: conflict between identification and control. Linear Algebra Appl., 122-124:219-244, 1989.
31. [P7] J. W. Polderman. A state space approach to the problem of adaptive pole assignment. Math. Control Signals Systems, 2:71-94, 1989.
32. [PW] J. W. Polderman and J. C. Willems. Introduction to Mathematical Systems Theory; a Behavioral Approach. Volume 26 of Texts in Applied Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997.
33. [S] C. Samson. An adaptive lq controller for nonminimum phase systems. Internat. J. Control, 35:1-28, 1982.
34. [vS] J. H. van Schuppen. Tuning of gaussian stochastic control systems. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 39:2178-2190, 1994.