Reproductive isolation and hybrid pollen disadvantage in Ipomopsis

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 536-540

  Campbell, Diane R ^a   Alarcon R ^b,c   Wu, C A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b ROCKY MOUNTAIN BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Hybrid fertility; Ipomopsis; Pollen competition; Reproductive isolation

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); GAMETE; HYBRID; POLLEN; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION;

ANGIOSPERMS; COLORADO; CROSSES, GENETIC; FERTILITY; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; POLLEN; REPRODUCTION; SEEDS;

AGGREGATA; EMBRYOPHYTA; IPOMOPSIS; IPOMOPSIS AGGREGATA; IPOMOPSIS TENUITUBA;

EID: 0037545920     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00538.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Alarcón, R. & Campbell, D.R. 2000. Absence of conspecific pollen advantage in the dynamics of an Ipomopsis (Polemoniaceae) hybrid zone. Amer. J. Bot. 87: 819-824.
2. Arnold, M.L. 1997. Natural Hybridization and Evolution. Oxford University, Oxford.
3. Campbell, D.R. & Dooley, J.L. 1992. The spatial scale of genetic differentiation in a hummingbird-pollinated plant: comparison with models of isolation by distance. Amer. Natur. 139: 735-748.
4. Campbell, D.R., Waser, N.M. & Meléndez-Ackerman, E.J. 1997. Analyzing pollinator-mediated selection in a plant hybrid zone: hummingbird visitation patterns on three spatial scales. Amer. Natur. 149: 295-315.
5. Campbell, D.R., Waser, N.M. & Wolf, P.G. 1998. Pollen transfer by natural hybrids and parental species in an Ipomopsis hybrid zone. Evolution 52: 1602-1611.
6. Campbell, D.R., Waser, N.M. & Pederson, G.T. 2002. Predicting patterns of mating and potential hybridization from pollinator behavior. Amer. Natur. 159: 438-450.
7. Campbell, D.R. & Waser, N.M. 2001. Genotype-by-environment interaction and the fitness of plant hybrids in the wild. Evolution 55: 669-676.
8. Carney, S.E., Cruzan, M.B. & Arnold, M.L. 1994. Reproductive interactions between hybridizing irises: analysis of pollen tube growth and fertilization success. Amer. J. Bot. 81: 1169-1175.
9. Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of Species. John Murray, London.
10. Grant, V. & Wilken, D.H. 1988. Natural hybridization between Ipomopsis aggregata and I. tenuituba (Polemoniaceae). Bot. Gaz. 149: 213-221.
11. Howard, D.J., Gregory, P.G., Chu, J. & Cain, M.L. 1998. Conspecific sperm precedence is an effective barrier to hybridization between closely related species. Evolution 52: 511-516.
12. Howard, D.J. 1999. Conspecific sperm and pollen precedence and speciation. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30: 109-132.
13. Meléndez-Ackerman, E. & Campbell, D.R. 1998. Adaptive significance of flower color and inter-trait correlations in an Ipomopsis hybrid zone. Evolution 52: 1293-1303.
14. Price, C.S.C. 1997. Conspecific sperm precedence in Drosophila. Nature 388: 663-666.
15. Rieseberg, L.H. & Carney, S.E. 1998. Plant hybridization. New Phytol. 140: 599-624.
16. Rieseberg, L.H., Desrochers, A.M. & Youn, S.J. 1995. Interspecific pollen competition as a reproductive barrier between sympatric species of Helianthus (Asteraceae). Amer. J. Bot. 82: 515-519.
17. Rieseberg, L.H., Whitton, J. & Gardner, K. 1999. Hybrid zones and the genetic architecture of a barrier to gene flow between two sunflower species. Genetics 152: 713-727.
18. Smith, H.H. & Daly, K. 1959. Discrete populations derived by interspecific hybridization and selection in Nicotiana. Evolution 13: 476-487.
19. Stebbins, G.L. 1950. Variation and Evolution in Plants. Columbia University, New York.
20. Stebbins, G.L. 1958. The inviability, weakness, and sterility of interspecific hybrids. Adv. Genet. 9: 147-215.
21. Tadmor, Y., Zamir, D. & Ladizinsky, G. 1987. Genetic mapping of an ancient translocation in the genus Lens. Theor. Appl. Genet. 73: 883-892.
22. Wesselingh, R.A. & Arnold, M.L. 2000. Pollinator behavior and the evolution of Louisiana iris hybrid zones. J. Evol. Biol. 13: 171-180.