Enhanced stimulation of chromosomal translocations by radiomimetic DNA damaging agents and camptothecin in Saccharomyces cerevisiae rad9 checkpoint mutants

Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis

Volumn 547, Issue 1-2, 2004, Pages 123-132

  Fasullo, Michael ^a   Zeng, Li ^a   Giallanza, Peter ^a  

^a ALBANY MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

DNA damaging agent; G2 checkpoint; Recombination; Yeast

Indexed keywords

4 NITROQUINOLINE 1 OXIDE; BLEOMYCIN; CAMPTOTHECIN; CISPLATIN; HISTIDINE; HYDROGEN PEROXIDE; METHYLNITRONITROSOGUANIDINE; MUTANT PROTEIN; PHLEOMYCIN; PROTEIN RAD9;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE G2 PHASE; CHROMOSOME 2; CHROMOSOME 4; CHROMOSOME TRANSLOCATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIPLOIDY; DNA DAMAGE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SISTER CHROMATID EXCHANGE; STIMULATION; WILD TYPE;

4-NITROQUINOLINE-1-OXIDE; CAMPTOTHECIN; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CHROMOSOMES, FUNGAL; DNA DAMAGE; DNA, FUNGAL; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; ENZYME INHIBITORS; METHYLNITRONITROSOGUANIDINE; MUTAGENS; MUTATION; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; TRANSLOCATION, GENETIC;

SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 1542285498     PISSN: 00275107     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2003.12.010     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Weinert T. DNA damage checkpoints update: getting molecular. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 8:1988;183-185.
2. Nyberg K., Michelson R., Putnam C., Weinert T.A. Toward maintaining the genome: DNA damage and replication checkpoints. Ann. Rev. Genet. 36:2002;617-657.
3. E.C. Friedberg, G.C. Walker, W. Siede, DNA Repair and Mutagenesis, ASM Press, Washington DC, 1995.
4. Weinert T.A., Hartwell L.H. The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Sacchromyces cerevisiae. Science. 241:1988;317-322.
5. Flattery-O'Brien J.A., W Dawes I. Hydrogen peroxide causes RAD9-dependent cell cycle arrest in G2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae whereas menadione causes G1 arrest independent of RAD9 function. J. Biol. Chem. 273:1998;8564-8571.
6. Kupiec M., Simchen G. Arrest of the mitotic cell cycle and of meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by MMS. Mol. Gen. Genet. 201:1985;558-564.
7. Grossman K.F., Brown J., Moses R.E. Cisplatin DNA cross-links do not inhibit S-phase and cause only a G2/M arrest in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat. Res. 434:1999;29-39.
8. Levin N.A., Bjornsti M.A., Fink G.R. A novel mutation in DNA topoisomerase I of yeast causes DNA damage and RAD9-dependent cell cycle arrest. Genetics. 133:1993;799-814.
9. Levin P., Escalza P., Mateos S., Cortes F. Mitomycin C, 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide and ethyl methanesulfonate induce long-lived lesions in DNA which result in SCEs during successive cell cycles in human lymphocytes. Mutat. Res. 270:1992;177-183.
10. Fabre F., Boulet A., Roman H. Gene conversion at different points in the mitotic cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Gen. Genet. 195:1984;139-143.
11. Kadyk L.C., HartwelL L.H. Sister chromatids are preferred over homologs as substrates for recombinational repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 132:1992;387-402.
12. Fasullo M., Bennett T., AhChing P., Koudelik J. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD9 checkpoint reduces the DNA damage-associated stimulation of directed translocations. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:1998;1190-1200.
13. Tercero J.A., Diffley J.F. Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkoint. Nature. 412:2001;553-557.
14. B. Garvick, M. Carson, L. Hartwell, Single-stranded DNA arising at telomeres in cdc13 mutants may constitute a specific signal for the RAD9 checkpoint, Mol Cell Biol. 15, 6128-6138.
15. Siede W., Friedberg A., Friedberg E. RAD9-dependent G1 arrest defines a second checkpoint for damaged DNA in the cell cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 90:1993;7985-7989.
16. Pouliot J.J., Robertson C.A., Nash H.A. Pathways for repair of topoisomerase I covalent complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Cells. 6:2001;677-687.
17. Paulovich A.G., Armour C.D., Hartwell L.H. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD9, RAD17, RAD24 and MEC3 genes are required for tolerating irreparable, ultraviolet-induced DNA damage. Genetics. 150:1998;75-93.
18. Van Brabant A., Buchanan C., Charboneau E., Fangman W., Brewer B. An origin-deficient yeast artificial chromosome triggers a cell cycle checkpoint. Mol. Cell. 7:2001;705-713.
19. F. Sherman, G.R. Fink, J.B. Hicks, Appendix A, in: Methods in Yeast Genetics, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 1986, pp. 163-168.
20. Fasullo M., Dave P., Rothstein R. DNA-damaging agents stimulate the formation of directed reciprocal translocations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat. Res. 314:1994;121-133.
21. Fasullo M., Dave P. Mating-type regulates the DNA damage-associated stimulation of reciprocal translocation events in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Gen. Genet. 243:1994;63-70.
22. M. Fasullo, P. Giallanza, Z. Dong, C. Cera, T. Bennett, Saccharomyces cervisiae rad51 mutants are defective in DNA damage-associated sister chromatid exchanges but exhibit increased rates of homology directed translocations, Genetics 158, 959-972.
23. J.H. Zar, Biostatistical Analysis, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1996.
24. McKoy J.F., Pleninger P., Wall L., Pramanik A., Martinez M., Morre C.W. Genetic changes and bioassays in bleomycin- and phleomycin-treated cells, and their relationship to chromosomal breaks. Mutat. Res. 336:1995;19-27.
25. Galli A., Schiestl R.H. Cell division transforms mutagenic lesions into deletion-recombinogenic lesions in yeast cells. Mutat. Res. 429:1999;13-26.
26. Burke W., Fangman W.L. Temporal order in yeast chromosome replication. Cell. 5:1975;263-269.
27. Aboussekhra A., Vialard J.E., Morison D., Torr-Ruiz M.A., Cernakova L., Fabre F., Lowndes N. The novel role for the budding yeast RAD9 checkpoint gene in DNA damage-dependent transcription. EMBO J. 14:1996;3912-3922.
28. Nitiss J., Wang J. DNA topoisomerase-targeting antitumor drugs can be studied in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 85:1998;7501-7505.
29. Grossman K.F., Ward A., Moses R.E. Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Lacking Snm1, Rev3, or Rad51 have a normal S-phase but arrest permanently in G2 after cisplatin treatment. Mutat. Res. 461:2000;1-13.
30. Malkova A., Ivanov E.L., Haber J.E. Double-strand break repair in the absence of RAD51 in yeast: a possible role for break-induced DNA replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 93:1996;7131-7136.
31. Haber J.E. DNA recombination: the replication connection. Trends Biochem. Sci. 24:1999;271-275.
32. Foiani M., Gerrari M., Liberi G., Lopes M., Lucca C., Marini F., Pelllicioli A., Muzi Falconi M., Plevani P. S-phase DNA damage checkpoint in budding yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 379:1999;1019-1023.
33. Romotar R., Belanger E., Brodeur I., Masson J.Y., Drobetsky E.A. A yeast homolgue of the human phosphotyrozyl phosphatase activator PTPA is implicated in protection against oxidative DNA damage induced by the model carcinogen 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide. J. Biol. Chem. 273:1998;21489-21496.
34. Al-Mograbi N.M., Al-Sharif I.S., Aboussekhra A. The Saccahromyces cerevisiae RAD9 cell cycle checkpoint gene is required for optimal repair of UV-induced pyrimidine dimers in both G(1) and G(2)/M phases of the cell cycle. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:2001;2020-2025.
35. Myung K., Kolodner R. Induction of genome instability by DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Rep. 2:2003;243-258.
36. Kolodner R., Putnam C., Myung K. Maintenance of genome stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science. 297:2002;552-557.