Innateness in cognitive science

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 136-141

  Samuels, Richard ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENES; NEUROLOGY;

COGNITIVE SCIENCE;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

CONCEPT FORMATION; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REVIEW;

ADULT; CHARACTER; CHILD; COGNITION; COGNITIVE SCIENCE; GENETIC DETERMINISM; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INSTINCT; LEARNING; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

EID: 1542285263     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.01.010     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. Leslie A. 'Theory of mind' as a mechanism of selective attention. Gazzaniga M. The New Cognitive Neuroscience. 2000;1235-1247 MIT Press.
2. Butterworth B. The Mathematical Brain. 1999;Macmillan.
3. Lipton J.S., Spelke E. Origins of number sense: large number discrimination in human infants. Psychol. Sci. 14:2003;396-401.
4. Johnson S. The development of visual surface perception: insights into the ontogeny of knowledge. Rovee-Collier C., et al. Progress in Infancy Research. Vol. 1:2000;113-154 Erlbaum.
5. Chomsky N. New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. 2000;Cambridge University Press.
6. Stromswold K. The cognitive neuroscience of language acquisition. Gazzaniga M. The New Cognitive Neuroscience. 2000;855-870 MIT Press.
7. Hume D. A Treatise of Human Nature. 1983;Oxford University Press.
8. Pallas S.L. Intrinsic and extrinsic factors that shape neocortical specification. Trends Neurosci. 24:2001;417-423.
9. Elman J., et al. Rethinking Innateness: a Connectionist Perspective on Development. 1996;MIT Press.
10. Marcus G.F. The Algebraic Mind. 2001;MIT Press.
11. Samuels R. What brains won't tell us about the mind: a critique of the neurobiological argument against representational nativism. Mind Lang. 13:1998;548-570.
12. Oyama S. Evolution's Eye. 2000;Duke University Press.
13. Griffiths P. What is innatness? Monist. 85:2002;70-85.
14. Johnson M. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. 1997;Blackwell.
15. Stich S. Introduction. Stich S. Innate Ideas. 1975;1-22 University of California Press.
16. Gottlieb G. Synthesizing Nature-Nurture: Prenatal Roots of Instinctive Behavior. 1997;Erlbaum.
17. Lecanuet J.P., et al. Prenatal discrimination of a male and female voice uttering the same sentence. Early development and parenting. 2:1993;212-228.
18. Scholl B.J., Leslie A.M. The innate capacity to acquire a 'theory of mind': synchronic or diachronic modularity? Mind Lang. 14:1999;131-153.
19. Fodor J. Doing without what's within. Mind. 110:2000;99-148.
20. Godfrey Smith P. Complexity and the Function of Mind in Nature. 1996;Cambridge University Press.
21. Karmiloff-Smith A. Development itself is the key to understanding developmental disorders. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2:1998;389-398.
22. Fodor J. In Critical Condition. 1998;MIT Press.
23. Fodor J. The present status of the innateness controversy. Fodor J. RepResentations: Philosophical Essays on the Foundations of Cognitive Science. 1981;257-316 MIT Press.
24. Cowie F. What's Within? Nativism Reconsidered. 1999;Oxford University Press.
25. Lorenz K. The nature of instinct. Schiller C.H. Instinctive Behavior: The Development of a Modern Concept. 1957;129-175 International University Press.
26. Plotkin H. Evolution in Mind. 1997;Penguin.
27. Bates E., et al. Innateness and emergentism. Bechtel W., Graham G. A Companion to Cognitive Science. 1998;590-601 Blackwell.
28. Lehrman D.S. Critique of Konrad Lorenz's theory of instinctive behaviour. Q. Rev. Biol. 28:1953;337-363.
29. Block N. Introduction: what is innateness? Block N. Readings in the Philosophy of Psychology. Vol. 2:1981;279-281 Methuen.
30. Griffiths P., Sterelny K. Sex and Death: An Introduction to Philosophy of Biology. 1999;University of Chicago Press.
31. Lewin B. Genes VII. 2002;Oxford University Press.
32. Godfrey-Smith P. Genes and codes: lessons from the philosophy of mind? Hardcastle V. Where Biology Meets Psychology. 1999;305-331 MIT Press.
33. Khalidi M.A. Nature and nurture in cognition. Br. J. Philos. Sci. 2002;251-272.
34. Sober, E. (1999) Innate knowledge. In Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Vol. 4) (Craig, E., ed.), pp. 794-7, Routledge.
35. Samuels R. Nativism in cognitive science. Mind Lang. 17:2002;233-265.
36. Lloyd E. Normality and variation: the human genome project and the ideal human type. Hull D., Ruse M. The Philosophy of Biology. 1994;552-566 Oxford University Press.
37. Carroll, J. (2003) Laws of nature. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Zalta, E., ed.), URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/laws-of- nature.
38. Cartwright N. In favor of laws that are not ceteris paribus after all. Erkenntnis. 57:2002;425-439.
39. Ariew A. Innateness is canalization: in defense of a developmental account of innateness. Hardcastle V. Where Biology Meets Psychology. 1999;117-138 MIT Press.
40. Ariew A. Innateness and canalization. Philos. Sci. 63:1996;S19-S27.
41. Samuels, R. Is innateness a confused notion? In Innateness and the Structure of the Human Mind (Vol. 3) (Carruthers, P. et al. eds) (in press).
42. Sober E. Separating nature and nurture. Wasserman D., Wachbroit R. Genetics and Criminal Behavior: Methods, Meanings and Morals. 2001;47-78 Cambridge University Press.