Feature description and categorization of common objects after traumatic brain injury: The effects of a multi-trial paradigm

Brain and Language

Volumn 89, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 216-225

  Constantinidou, Fofi ^a   Kreimer, Laurel ^b  

^a MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b St Elizabeth Medical Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Categorization; Feature description; Object description; Recall; TBI; Verbal learning; Working memory

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; PERCEPTION; TRAINING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANOMIA; BRAIN INJURY, CHRONIC; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HEAD INJURIES, CLOSED; HUMANS; LANGUAGE DISORDERS; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL;

EID: 1542268982     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00399-7     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Amazeen E.L., Turvey M.T. Weight perception and the haptic size-weight illusion are functions of the inertia tensor. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 22(1):1996;213-232.
2. Butters M.A., Glisky E.L., Schachter D.L. Transfer of new learning in memory-impaired patients. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 15(2):1993;219-230.
3. Caramazza A., Shelton J.R. Domain-specific knowledge systems in the brain: The animate-inanimate distinction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 10:1998;1-34.
4. Cicerone K.D. Attention deficits and dual task demands after mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury. 10(2):1996;79-89.
5. Coehlo C.A. Story narratives of adults with closed head injury and non-brain-injured adults: Influence of socioeconomic status, elicitation task, and executive functioning. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research. 45(6):2002;1232-1248.
6. Coehlo C.A., Liles B.Z., Duffy R.J. Impairments of discourse abilities and executive functions in traumatically brain injured adults. Brain Injury. 9(5):1995;471-477.
7. Constantinidou F. Active memory strategies following moderate-to-severe head injury: In search of important components. Hearsay. 12(2):1998;20-27.
8. Constantinidou F. The effects of stimulus modality on interference and recognition performance following brain injury. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology. 7(4):1999;283-295.
9. Constantinidou F., Neils J. Stimulus modality and verbal learning after moderate to severe closed head injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. 10(4):1995;90-100.
10. Constantinidou F., Neils J., Bouman D., Lee L., Shuren J. Pictorial superiority during verbal learning tasks in moderate to severe closed head injury: Additional evidence. Journal of General Psychology. 12.3(3):1996;173- 184.
11. Constantinidou, F., Thomas, R. D., & Best, P. (in press). Principles of cognitive rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury: A systematic hierarchical approach. In M. Ashley (Ed.), Traumatic brain injury rehabilitation (2nd ed.).
12. Delis D.C., Kramer J.H., Kaplan E., Ober B.A. The california verbal learning test. 2nd ed. 2000;The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX.
13. Eimer M. An event related potential study of transient and sustained visual attention to color and form. Biological Psychology. 44:1997;143-160.
14. Farah M.J., McClelland J.L. A computational model of semantic memory impairment: Modality specificity and emergent category specificity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 120:1991;339-357.
15. Gazzaniga M.S., Ivry R.B., Mangun G.R. Cognitive neuroscience: The biology of the mind. 1998;W.W. Norton & Company, New York.
16. Gentilini M., Nichelli P., Schoenhuber R. Assessment of attention in mild head injury. Levin H.S., Eisenberg H.M., Benton A.L. Mild head injury. 1989;163-175 Oxford University Press, New York.
17. Goodglass H., Kaplan E. Assessment of cognitive deficit in the brain-injured patient. Handbook of behavioral neurobiology. 2:1979;3-21.
18. Heaton, R. K., Chelune, G. J., Talley, J. L., Kay, G. G., & Curtis, G. (1993). Wisconsin card sorting test manual-revised and expanded. Psychological Assessment Resources.
19. Kibby M.Y., Schmitter-Edgecombe M., Long C.J. Ecological validity of neuropsychological tests: Focus on the california verbal learning test and the wisconsin card sorting test. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 13(6):1998;523-534.
20. Kinsella G., Murtagh D., Landry A., Homfray K., Hammond M., O'Beirneet al. Everyday memory following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury. 10(7):1996;499-507.
21. Levin H.S. Neuropsychological rehabilitation of head injured patients: An appraisal of recent progress. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, Suppl. 26(Suppl.):1992;14-24.
22. Lezak M.D. Neuropsychological assessment. 3rd ed. 1995;Oxford University Press, New York.
23. Lodge-Miller D.A., Robin D.A., Schum R.L. Attentional impairments following closed head injury. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology. 1(2):1993;133-146.
24. Millis S.R., Richer J.H. Verbal learning patterns in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical Experimental Neuropsychology. 6(4):1994;498-507.
25. Mills S.R., Rosenthal M., Novack T.A., Sherer M., Nick T.G., Kreutzer J.S., High W.M., Ricker J.H. Long-term neuropsychological outcome after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. 16(4):2001;343-355.
26. Montgomery G.K. A multi-factor account of disability after brain injury: Implications for neuropsychological counseling. Brain Injury. 9(5):1995;453-469.
27. Shimamura A.P. Memory and frontal lobe function. Gazzaniga M.S. The cognitive neurosciences. 1995;803-813 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
28. Slomine B.S., Gerring J.P., Grados M.A., Vasa R., Brandy K.D., Christensen J.R., Denckla M.B. Performance on measures of "executive function" following pediatric traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury. 16(9):2002;759-772.
29. Zeno S.M., Ivans S.H., Millard R.T., Duvvuri R. The educator's word frequency guide. 1995;Touchstone Applied Science Associates (TASA), Inc.