Employee development: An organizational justice perspective

Personnel Review

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2004, Pages

  McDowall, A ^a   Fletcher, C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

360 degree feedback; Attitudes; Employees development; Justice; Workplace

Indexed keywords

EID: 1542267851     PISSN: 00483486     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/00483480410510606     Document Type: Review

References (60)

1. Adams, J.S. (1965), "Inequity in social exchange", in Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 2, Academic Press, New York, NY, pp. 267-99.
2. Allen, N.J. and Meyer, J.P. (1990), "The measurements and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization", Journal of Occupational Psychology, Vol. 63, pp. 1-18.
3. Bastos, M. and Fletcher, C. (1995), "Exploring the individual's perception of sources and credibility of feedback in the work environment", International Journal of Selection and Assessment, Vol. 3, pp. 29-39.
4. Bauer, T.N., Truxillo, D.M., Sanchez, R.J., Craig, J.M., Ferrara, P. and Campion, M.A. (2001), "Applicant reactions to selection: development of the selection procedural justice scale (SPJS)", Personnel Psychology, Vol. 54, pp. 387-419.
5. Bies, R.J. and Moag, J.S. (1986), "Interactional justice: communication criteria of fairness", in Lewicki, J.J., Sheppard, B.H. and Bazerman, M.H. (Eds), Research on Negotiation in Organizations, Vol. 1, JAI, Greenwich, CT, pp. 43-55.
6. Bowen, D.E., Gilliland, S.W. and Folger, R. (1999), "HRM and service fairness: how being fair with employees spills over to customers", Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 27, pp. 7-23.
7. Carrick, P. and Williams, R. (1998), "Development centres - a review of assumptions", Human Resource Management Journal, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 77-92.
8. Cattell, R.B. (1966), "The scree test for the number of factors", Multivariate Behavior Research, Vol. 1, pp. 245-69.
9. Cleveland, J.N. and Murphy, K.R. (1992), "Analyzing performance as goal-directed behavior", in Ferris, G. and Rowland, K. (Eds), Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT.
10. Coleman, D.F., Irving, G.P. and Cooper, C.L. (1999), "Another look at the locus of control-organizational commitment relationship: it depends on the form of commitment", Journal of Organizational Behaviour, Vol. 20, pp. 995-1001.
11. Comrey, A.L. and Lee, H.B. (1992), A First Course in Factor Analysis, 2nd ed., Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
12. Cropanzano, R. and Folger, R. (1991), "Procedural justice and worker motivation", in Steers, R.M. and Porter, L.W. (Eds), Motivation and Work Behavior, 5th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, pp. 131-43.
13. Cropanzano, R. and Greenberg, J. (1997), "Progress in organizational justice: tunnelling through the maze", International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 12, pp. 317-72.
14. Cropanzano, R., Prehar, C.A. and Chen, P.Y. (2002), "Using social exchange theory to distinguish procedural from interactional justice", Group & Organization Management, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 324-51.
15. Erdogan, B., Kraimer, M.L. and Liden, R.C. (2001), "Procedural justice as a two-dimensional construct: an examination in the performance appraisal context", Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, Vol. 37, pp. 205-22.
16. Fischer, R.A. and Yates, F. (1974), Statistical Tables for Biological, Agricultural and Medical Research, Longman, London.
17. Fletcher, C. (1997), Appraisal: Routes to Improved Performance, 2nd ed., Institute of Personnel and Development, London.
18. Fletcher, C. (2001), "Performance appraisal and management: the developing research agenda", Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 74, pp. 473-87.
19. Fletcher, C. and Baldry, C. (1999), "Multi-source feedback systems: a research perspective", in International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, London.
20. Fletcher, C. and Williams, R. (1992), Performance Management in the UK: An Analysis of the Issues, Institute of Personnel and Development, London.
21. Fletcher, C. and Williams, R. (1996), "Performance management, job satisfaction and organizational commitment", British Journal of Management, Vol. 7, pp. 169-79.
22. Fletcher, C., Baldry, C. and Cunningham-Snell, N. (1997), "The psychometric properties of 360 degree feedback: an empirical study and a cautionary tale", International Journal of Selection and Assessment, Vol. 6, pp. 19-34.
23. Flint, D.H. (1999), "The role of organizational justice in multi-source performance appraisal: theory-based applications and directions for research", Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 9, pp. 1-20.
24. Folger, R. and Bies, R.J. (1989), "Managerial responsibilities and procedural justice", Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, Vol. 2, pp. 79-90.
25. Folger, R. and Cropanzano, R. (1998), Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
26. Folger, R. and Greenberg, J. (1985), "Procedural justice: an interpretive analysis of personnel systems", Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Vol. 3, pp. 141-83.
27. Folger, R. and Konovsky, M.A. (1989), "Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay rise decisions", Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 32, pp. 115-30.
28. Garavan, T.N., Morley, M. and Flynn, M. (1997), "360 degree feedback: its role in employee development", Journal of Management Development, Vol. 16, pp. 134-47.
29. Gilliland, S.W. (1993), "The perceived fairness of selection systems: an organizational justice perspective", Academy of Management Review, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 694-734.
30. Gilliland, S.W. (1995), "Fairness from the applicant's perspective: reactions to employee selection procedures", International Journal of Selection and Assessment, Vol. 3, pp. 10-19.
31. Greenberg, J. (1986a), "Organizational performance appraisal procedures: what makes them fair", in Lewicki, R.J., Sheppard, B.H. and Bazerman, M.H. (Eds), Research on Negotiation in Organizations, Vol. 1, JAI Press, London.
32. Greenberg, J. (1986b), "Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 71, pp. 340-2.
33. Greenberg, J. (1990), "Organizational justice: yesterday, today and tomorrow", Journal of Management, Vol. 16, pp. 399-432.
34. Judge, T.A. and Ferris, G.R. (1993), "Social context of performance evaluation decisions", Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 36, pp. 80-105.
35. Kluger, A.N. and DeNisi, A. (1996), "The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis and a preliminary feedback intervention theory", Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 119, pp. 254-84.
36. Ko, J.-W., Prices, J.L. and Mueller, C.W. (1997), "Assessment of Meyer and Allen's three-component model or organizational commitment in South Korea", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 82, pp. 961-73.
37. Konovsky, M.A. and Cropanzano, R. (1991), "The perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 76, pp. 698-707.
38. Landy, F.J., Barnes, J.L. and Murphy, K.R. (1978), "Correlates of perceived fairness and accuracy of performance evaluation", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 63, pp. 751-4.
39. Landy, F.J., Barnes-Farrel, J.L. and Cleveland, J.N. (1980), "Perceived fairness and accuracy of performance evaluation: a follow up", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 65, pp. 355-6.
40. Lefkowitz, J. (2000), "The role of interpersonal affective regard in supervisory performance ratings: a literature review and proposed causal model", Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 73, pp. 67-85.
41. Leventhal, G.S. (1980), "What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships", in Gergen, K.J., Greenberg, M.S. and Willis, R.H. (Eds), Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research, Plenum, New York, NY, pp. 27-55.
42. Levine, M.J. (1975), Comparative Labour Relations Law, General Learning Press, Morristown, NJ.
43. London, M. and Smither, J.W. (1995), "Can multi-source feedback change perceptions of goal accomplishment, self-evaluations and performance related outcomes? Theory-based applications and directions for research", Personnel Psychology, Vol. 48, pp. 803-39.
44. Mathieu, J.E. and Zajac, D.M. (1990), "A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment", Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 108, pp. 171-94.
45. Murphy, K.R. and Cleveland, J.N. (1991), Performance Appraisal: An Organizational Justice Perspective, Allyn & Bacon, Boston, MA.
46. Murphy, K.R. and Cleveland, J.N. (1995), Understanding Performance Appraisals: Social, Organizational and Goal-based Perspectives, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
47. Murphy, K., Cleveland, J., Henle, C., Morgan, K., Orth, M. and Tziner, A. (1996), "Effects of proximal and distal context variables on performance appraisal quality: a model and framework for research", Proceedings of 15th Biennial Applied Behavioral Sciences Symposium, US Air Force Academy, Colorado Springs, CO.
48. Nathan, B.R., Mohrmann, A.M. and Milliman, J. (1991), "Interpersonal relations as a context for the effects of appraisal interviews on performance and satisfaction: a longitudinal study", Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 34, pp. 352-69.
49. Patrick, J. (1992), Training: Research and Practice, Academic Press, London.
50. Patterson, F. (2001), "Developments in work psychology: emerging issues and future trends", Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 74, pp. 381-90.
51. Rousseau, D.M. (1995), Psychological Contracts in Organizations, Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreements, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
52. Schaubroeck, J., May, D.R. and Brown, F.W. (1994), "Procedural justice explanations and employee reactions to economic hardship: a field experiment", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 79, pp. 455-60.
53. Smith, M.A. and Leigh, B. (1997), "Virtual subjects: using the Internet as an alternative source of subjects and research environment", Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, Vol. 29, pp. 496-505.
54. Stanton, J.M. (1998), "An empirical assessment of data collection using the Internet", Personnel Psychology, Vol. 51, pp. 709-25.
55. Stanton, J.M. and Rogelberg, S.G. (2001), "Using Internet/intranet Web pages to collect organizational research data", Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 200-17.
56. Tabachnik, B.G. and Fidell, L.S. (1996), Using Multivariate Statistics, 3rd ed., HarperCollins Publishers, Inc., Northridge, CA.
57. Thibaut, J. and Walker, L. (1975), Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis, Erllbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
58. Tyler, T.R. and Bies, R.J. (1990), "Beyond formal procedures: the interpersonal context of procedural justice", in Carroll, J.S. (Ed.), Applied Social Psychology and Organizational Settings, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 77-98.
59. Williams, R. (1998), Performance Management, Institute of Personnel and Development, London.
60. Yost, P.R. and Homer, L.E. (1998), "Electronic versus paper surveys: does the medium affect the response?", paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, April, Dallas, TX.