Shape distances in general linear models: Are they really at odds with the goals of morphometrics? A reply to Klingenberg

Evolution

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 196-199

  Monteiro, Leandro R ^a   Diniz Filho, José A F ^b   Dos Reis, Sérgio F ^c   Araújo, Edilson D ^d  

^a UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DO NORTE FLUMINENSE DARCY RIBEIRO   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF GOIÁS   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^d TIRADENTES UNIVERSITY   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037281103     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00231.x     Document Type: Note

References (17)

1. Atchley, W. R., and B. K. Hall. 1991. A model for development and evolution of complex morphological structures. Biol. Rev. 66:101-157.
2. Bookstein, F. L. 1991. Morphometric tools for landmark data: geometry and biology. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK.
3. _. 1996. Combining the tools of geometric morphometrics. Pp. 131-151 in L. F. Marcus, M. Corti, A. Loy, G. J. P. Naylor, and D. E. Slice, eds. Advances in morphometrics. Plenum Press, New York.
4. Dryden, I. L., and K. V. Mardia. 1998. Statistical shape analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
5. Goodall, C. R. 1991. Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 53:285-339.
6. Hendry, A. P., and M. T. Kinnison. 1999. The pace of modern life: measuring rates of contemporary microevolution. Evolution 53:1637-1653.
7. Johnson, R. A., and D. W. Wichern. 1988. Applied multivariate statistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
8. Klingenberg, C. P. 2003. Quantitative genetics of geometric shape: heritability and the pitfalls of the univariate approach. Evolution 57:191-195.
9. Klingenberg, C. P., and L. J. Leamy. 2001. Quantitative genetics of geometric shape in the mouse mandible. Evolution 55:2342-2352.
10. Klingenberg, C. P., and G. S. McIntyre. 1998. Geometric morphometrics of developmental instability: analyzing patterns of fluctuating asymmetry with Procrustes methods. Evolution 52:1363-1375.
11. Lynch, M., and B. Walsh. 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
12. Monteiro, L. R. 1999. Multivariate regression models and geometric morphometrics: the search for causal factors in the analysis of shape. Syst. Biol. 48:192-199.
13. Monteiro, L. R., J. A. F. Diniz-Filho, S. F. dos Reis, and E. D. Araújo. 2002. Geometric estimates of heritability in biological shape. Evolution 56:563-572.
14. Rohlf, F. J. 1996. Morphometric spaces, shape components and the effect of linear transformations. Pp. 117-130 in L. F. Marcus, M. Corti, A. Loy, G. J. P. Naylor, and D. E. Slice, eds. Advances in morphometrics. Plenum Press, New York.
15. _. 2000. TpsRegr: A program to perform multivariate regression on morphometric data. Ver. 1.25. Dept. of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY.
16. Spicer, G. S. 1993. Morphological evolution of the Drosophila virilis species group as assessed by rate tests for natural selection on quantitative characters. Evolution 47:1240-1254.
17. Turelli, M., J. H. Gillespie, and R. Lande. 1988. Rate tests for selection on quantitative characters during macroevolution and microevolution. Evolution 42:1085-1089.