The effect of human command phonetic characteristics on auditory cognition in dogs (Canis familiaris)

Journal of Comparative Psychology

Volumn 119, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 117-120

  Fukuzawa, M ^a   Mills, D S ^a   Cooper, J J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LINCOLN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; COGNITION; DOG; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; PHONETICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; COGNITION; COMMUNICATION; DOGS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHONETICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 15244360734     PISSN: 07357036     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.119.1.117     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Eimas, P. D., & Corbit, J. (1973). Selective adaptation of linguistic features detectors. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 99-109.
2. Eisenhart, C. (1972). The assumptions underlying the analysis of variance. In R. E. Kirk (Ed.), Statistical issues (pp. 226-240). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
3. Fukuzawa, M., Mills, D. S., & Cooper, J. J. (in press). More than just a word: Non-semantic command variables affecting obedience in the domestic dog. Applied Animal Behaviour Science.
4. Fukuzawa, M., Uetake, K., & Tanaka, T. (2000, March). The analysis of factors influencing auditory cognition of verbal commands in dogs (Canis familiaris). Poster session presented at the Sixth Annual Meeting of the Society for the Study of Human Animal Relations, Tokyo, Japan.
5. Fukuzawa, M., Uetake, K., & Tanaka, T. (2002, April). Auditory cognition of phonemic inflected commands in dogs. Poster session presented at the Proceedings of the 2002 Companion Animal Behaviour Therapy Study Group/Animal Welfare, Science, Ethics, and Law Veterinary Association study day "Emerging issues in behaviour and welfare." Birmingham, United Kingdom.
6. Kaminski, J., Call, J., & Fischer, J. (2004, June 11). Word learning in a domestic dog: Evidence for "fast mapping." Science, 304, 1682-1683.
7. McConnell, P. B. (1990). Acoustic structure and receiver response in domestic dogs, Canis familiaris. Animal Behaviour, 39, 897-904.
8. McConnell, P. B. (1991). Lessons from animal trainers: The effect of acoustic structure on an animal's response. In P. Bateson & P. Klopfer (Eds.), Perspectives in ethology (pp. 165-187). New York: Plenum.
9. McConnell, P. B., & Baylis, J. R. (1985). Interspecific communication in co-operative herding: Acoustic and visual signals from human shepherds and herding dogs. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 67, 302-328.
10. Mitchell, R. W. (2001). Americans' talk to dog during play: Similarities and differences with talk to infants. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 34, 182-210.
11. Mitchell, R. W., & Edmonson, E. (1999). Functions of repetitive talk to dogs during play. Society and Animals, 7, 55-81.
12. Moore, B. C. J. (1989). An introduction to the psychology of hearing. London: Academic Press.
13. Pongrácz, P., Miklósi, A., & Csányi, V. (2001). Owners' belief in the ability of their pet dogs to understand human verbal communication: A case of social understanding. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 20, 87-107.
14. Soprani, K., Miklósi, A., Topál, J., & Csányi, V. (2001). Comprehension of human communicative signs in pet dogs (Canis familiaris). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 115, 122-126.
15. Topál, J., Miklósi, A., Csányi, V., & Dóka, A. (1998). Attachment behavior in dogs (Canis familiaris): A new application of Ainsworth's (1969) strange situation test. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 112, 219-229.
16. Warden C. J., & Warner, L. H. (1928). The sensory capacities and intelligence of dogs, with a report on the ability of the noted dog "Fellow" to respond to verbal stimuli. Quarterly Review of Biology, 3, 1-28.
17. Woodhouse, B. (1978). No bad dogs. Aylesbury, Bucks, United Kingdom Hazell, Watson & Viney.