A versatile stereoscopic visual display system for vestibular and oculomotor research

Journal of Vestibular Research: Equilibrium and Orientation

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 363-379

  Kramer, Phillip D ^a,b   Roberts, Dale C ^a   Shelhamer, Mark ^a   Zee, David S ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Pathology Bldg 2 210 ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Head mounted display; Oculomotor; Vestibular; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR CONVERGENCE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST CONTROL; DISPLAY SYSTEM; EYE FIXATION; GAZE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; OCULOMOTOR SYSTEM; OPTOKINETIC NYSTAGMUS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SMOOTH PURSUIT EYE MOVEMENT; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; TECHNOLOGY; VESTIBULAR STIMULATION; VESTIBULAR TEST; VESTIBULOOCULAR REFLEX; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISUAL DISPLAY UNIT; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 0031688414     PISSN: 09574271     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/ves-1998-8503     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Tokunaga O. The influence of linear acceleration on optokinetic nystagmus in human subjects. Acta Otolaryngol 1977;84:338-43.
2. Hofstetter-Degen K, Wetzig J, von Baumgarten R. Oculovestibular interactions under microgravity. Clin Invest 1993;71:749-56.
3. Clement G, Reschke MF, Verrett CM, Wood SJ. Effects of gravitoinertial force variations on optokinetic nystagmus and on perception of visual stimulus orientation. Aviat Space Environ Med 1992;63:771-7.
4. Kass JR, Bruzek W, Probst T, Thumler T, Vieville T, Vogel H. European vestibular experiments on the Spacelab-1 mission: 2: experimental equipment and methods. Exp Brain Res 1986;64:247-54.
5. Harris LR, Jenkin M. Comparing judgement of linear displacement using visual and vestibular cues [Abstract]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1996;37:S518.
6. Cheung BSK, Howard IP, Money KE. Visually-induced tilt during parabolic flights. Exp Brain Res 1990;81:391-7.
7. Telford L, Howard IP. Role of optical flow field asymmetry in the perception of heading during linear motion. Percept Psychophys 1996;58:283-8.
8. Marr D. Vision. New York: WH Freeman and Company; 1982. p114.
9. Haber RN, Hershenson M. The psychology of visual perception. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.; 1973. p142.
10. Straumann D. Off-line computing of slow-phase eye velocity profiles evoked by velocity steps or caloric stimulation. Int J Bio-med Comput 1991;29:61-5.
11. Tiliket C, Shelhamer M, Roberts D, Zee DS. Short-term vestibulo-ocular reflex adaptation in humans; 1: Effect on the ocular motor velocity-to-position neural integrator. Exp Brain Res 1994;100:316-27.
12. Kramer PD, Shelhamer M, Zee DS. Short-term adaptation of the phase of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) in normal human subjects. Exp Brain Res 1995;106:318-26.
13. Mach E, translation by Williams CM. The analysis of sensations. New York: Dover; 1959.
14. Andersen GJ, Braunstein ML. Induced self-motion in central vision. J Exp Psychol 1985;11:122-32.
15. Brandt T, Dichgans J, Koenig E. Differential effects of central versus peripheral vision on egocentric and exocentric motion perception. Exp Brain Res 1973;23: 471-89.