Three-dimensional bioreactor cultures: A useful dynamic model for the study of cellular interactions

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Volumn 1030, Issue , 2004, Pages 103-115

  Konstantinov, Spiro M ^a   Mindova, Mina M ^b   Gospodinov, Panayot T ^b   Genova, Penka I ^a,b  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOFIA   (Bulgaria)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOFIA   (Bulgaria)

Author keywords

Hematopoietic cells; Mathematical model of the movement of spheroids; MiniPERM; Rotating wall vessel bioreactors; Three dimensional cell culture

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; BIOREACTOR; BONE MARROW CELL; CELL CULTURE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL INTERACTION; CELL PROLIFERATION; COLONY FORMING UNIT; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEMATOPOIETIC CELL; HODGKIN DISEASE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MICROGRAVITY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; SHEAR STRESS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SPHEROID CELL; STEM CELL;

EID: 15044343672     PISSN: 00778923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1196/annals.1329.013     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. ACKER, H. 1984. Micro-environmental conditions in multi-cellular spheroids grown over liquid-overlay tissue culture conditions. Recent Results Cancer Res. 95: 116-133.
2. INGRAM, M., G.B. TECHY, R. SAROUFEEM, et al. 1997. Three dimensional growth patterns of various human tumor cell lines in simulated microgravity of a NASA bioreactor. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Animal 33: 459-466.
3. MOLNAR, G., N.A. SCHROEDL, S.R. GONDA, et al. 1997. Skeletal muscle cells cultured in simulated microgravity. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Animal 33: 386-391.
4. WALTHER, I. 2002. Space bioreactors and their applications. Adv. Space Biol. Med. 8: 197-213.
5. DUTT, K., G. SANFORD, S. HARRIS-HOOKER, et al. 2003. Three-dimensional model of angiogenesis: co-culture of human retinal cells with bovine aortic endothelial cells in NASA bioreactor. Tissue Eng. 9: 893-908.
6. SANFORD, G., D. ELLERSON, C. MELHADO-GARDNER, et al. 2002. Three-dimensional growth of endothelial cells in the microgravity-based rotating wall vessel bioreactor. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Animal 38: 493-504.
7. FOSTER, L., D. CATZEL, S. ATWA, et al. 2003. Increase in synthesis of human monoclonal antibodies by transfected Sp2/0 myeloma mouse cell line under conditions of microgravity. Biotechnol. Lett. 25: 1271-1274.
8. RADIN, S., P. DUCHEYNE, P.S. AYYASWAMY, et al. 2001. Surface transformation of bioactive glass in bioreactors simulating microgravity conditions. Part 1. Experimental study. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 75: 369-378.
9. NETTLES, D., S. ELDER & J. GILBERT. 2002. Potential use of chitosan as a cell scaffold material for cartilage tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. 8: 1009-1016.
10. PEI, M., L. SOLCHAGA, J. SEIDEL, et al. 2002. Bioreactors mediate the effectiveness of tissue engineering scaffolds. FASEB J. 16: 1691-1694.
11. SIKAVITSAS, V., G. BANCROFT & A. MIKOS. 2002. Formation of three-dimensional cell/ polymer constructs for bone tissue engineering in a spinner flask and a rotating wall vessel bioreactor. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 62: 136-148.
12. BEGLEY, C. & S. KLEIS. 2000. The fluid dynamic and shear environment in the NASA/ JSC rotating-wall perfused-vessel bioreactor. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 70: 32-40.
13. GRANET, C., N. LAROSHE, L. VICO, et al. 1998. Rotating-wall vessels promising bioreactors for osteoblastic cell culture. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 36: 513-519.
14. GENOVA, P., S. KONSTANTINOV, M. MICHAILOVA, et al. 2002. On the dynamics of a cell spheroid in rotating wall vessel bioreactor (in Bulgarian). Mechanics of Machines 46: 45-57.
15. RAMIREZ, L., E. LIM, C. COIMBRA, et al. 2003. On the dynamics of a spherical scaffold in rotating bioreactors. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 84: 382-389.
16. JESSUP, J.M., T.J. GOODWIN & G. SPAULDING. 1993. Prospects for use of microgravity-based bioreactors to study three-dimensional host-tumor interactions in human neoplasia. Cell Biochem. 51: 290-300.
17. FALKENBERG, F.W. 1998. Production of monoclonal antibodies in the miniPERM bioreactor: comparison with other hybridoma culture methods. Res. Immunol. 149: 560-570.
18. BRUCE, M.P., V. BOYD, C. DUCH, et al. 2002. Dialysis based bioreactor systems for the production of monoclonal antibodies: alternatives to ascites production in mice. J. Immunol. Methods 264: 59-68.