3-D modelling and analysis of Dst C-responses in the North Pacific Ocean region, revisited

Geophysical Journal International

Volumn 160, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 505-526

  Kuvshinov, Alexei ^a,b,c   Utada, Hisashi ^a   Avdeev, Dmitry ^b   Koyama, Takao ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (Russian Federation)

^c TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^d JAPAN AGENCY FOR MARINE EARTH SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

3 D conductivity spherical models; C responses; Forward modelling; North Pacific Ocean; Oceans; Upper and mid mantle

Indexed keywords

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; MANTLE; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING;

EID: 15044340989     PISSN: 0956540X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2005.02477.x     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Avdeev, D.B., Kuvshinov, A.V., Pankratov, O.V. & Newman, G.A., 1997. High-performance three-dimensional electromagnetic modeling using modified Neumann series. Wide-band numerical solution and examples, J. Geomagn. Geoelectr., 49, 1519-1539.
2. Avdeev, D.B., Kuvshinov, A.V., Pankratov, O.V. & Newman, G.A., 1998. Three-dimensional frequency-domain modelling of airborne electromagnetic responses, Explor. Geophys., 29, 111-119.
3. Avdeev, D.B., Kuvshinov, A.V., Pankratov, O.V. & Newman, G.A., 2000. 3D EM modelling using fast integral equation approach with Krylov subspaces accelerator, in Proceedings of the 62nd EAGE Conference and Technical Exhibition, Glasgow, Scotland, pp. 183-187.
4. Avdeev, D.B., Kuvshinov, A.V., Pankratov, O.V., Newman, G.A. & Rudyak, B.V., 2002a. Modelling induction log responses in 3D geometries using fast integral equation approach, in Three-dimensional Electromagnetics, pp. 55-63, eds Zhdanov, M.S. & Wannamaker, P., Elsevier, Amsterdam.
5. Avdeev, D.B., Kuvshinov, A.V., Pankratov, O.V. & Newman, G.A., 2002b. Three-dimensional induction logging problems, Part I: An integral equation solution and model comparisons, Geophysics, 67, 413-426.
6. Avdeev, D.B., Kuvshinov, A.V. & Epova, K.A., 2002. Three-dimensional modeling of electromagnetic logs from inclined-horizontal wells, Izv., Phys Solid Earth, 38, 975-980.
7. Banks, R., 1969. Geomagnetic variations and the electrical conductivity of the upper mantle, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 17, 457-487.
8. Chandrasekhar, E., Oshiman, N. & Yumoto K., 2003. On the role of oceans in the geomagnetic induction by Sq along the 210° magnetic meridian region, Earth Planets Space, 55, 315-326.
9. Chave, A.D., Luther, D.S., Lanzerotti, L.J. & Medford, L.V., 1992. Geoelectric field measurements on a planetary scale: oceanographic and geophysical applications, Geophys. Res. Lett., 19, 1411-1414.
10. Constable, S.C. & Constable, C.G., 2004. Observing geomagnetic induction in magnetic satellite measurements and associated implications for mantle conductivity, Geochem., Geophys., Geosyst., 5(1), doi:10.1029/2003GC000634.
11. Constable, S.C. & Heinson, G.S., 2004. Hawaiin hot-spot swell structure from seafloor MT sounding, Tectonophysics, 389, 111-124.
12. Constable, S.C., Parker, R.L. & Constable, C.G., 1987. Occam's inversion: a practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data, Geophysics, 52, 289-300.
13. Egbert, G.D. & Booker, J.R., 1992. Very long period magnetotellurics at Tucson observatory: implications for mantle conductivity, J. geophys. Res., 97, 15 099-15 112.
14. Egbert, G.D., Booker, J.R. & Schultz, A., 1992. Very long period magnetotellurics at Tucson observatory: estimation of impedances, J. geophys. Res., 97, 15 113-15 128.
15. Everett, M.E., Constable, S. & Constable, C.G., 2003. Effects of near-surface conductance on global satellite induction responses, Geophys. J. Int., 153, 277-286.
16. Fletcher, R., 1976. Conjugate gradient methods for indefinite linear systems, in Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 596, pp. 73-89, Springer, New York.
17. Fujii, I. & Schultz, A., 2002. The three-dimensional electromagnetic response of the Earth to ring current and auroral oval excitation, Geophys. J. Int., 151, 689-709.
18. Fujii, I. & Utada, H., 2000. On geoelectric potential variations over a planetary scale, Mem. Kakioka Magn. Observatory, 29, 1-81.
19. Greenbaum, A., 1997. Iterative Methods for Solving Linear Systems, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA.
20. Hestenes, M.R. & Stiefel, E., 1952. Methods of conjugate gradients for solving linear systems, J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand., 49, 409-435.
21. Koyama, T., 2001. A study on the electrical conductivity of the mantle by voltage measurements of submarine cables, PhD Dissertation, Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo, Japan (in English).
22. Koyama, T., Shimizu, H. & Utada, H., 2002. Possible effects of lateral heterogeneity in the D″ layer on electromagnetic variations of core origin, Phys. Earth planet. Int., 129, 99-116.
23. Kuvshinov, A.V., Olsen, N., Avdeev, D.B. & Pankratov, O.V., 2002a. Electromagnetic induction in the oceans and the anomalous behaviour of coastal C-responses for periods up to 20 days, Geophys. Res. Lett. 29(12), doi:10.1029/2001GL014409.
24. Kuvshinov, A.V., Avdeev, D.B., Pankratov, O.V., Golyshev, S.A. & Olsen, N., 2002b. Modelling electromagnetic fields in 3-D spherical earth using fast integral equation approach, in Three-dimensional Electromagnetics, pp. 43-54, eds Zhdanov, M.S. & Wannamaker, P., Elsevier, Amsterdam.
25. Lanczos, C., 1952. Solution of systems of linear equations by minimized iterations, J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand., 49, 33-52.
26. Lanzerotti, L.J., Sayres, C.H., Medford, L.V., Kraus J.S. & Maclennan, C.J., 1992. Earth potential over 4000 km between Hawaii and California, Geophys. Res. Lett., 19, 1177-1180.
27. Laske, G. & Masters, G., 1997. A global digital map of sediment thickness, EOS, Trans. Am. geophys. Un., 78, F483.
28. Lizarralde, D., Chave, A., Hirth, G. & Schultz, A., 1995. North-eastern Pacific mantle conductivity profile from long-period magnetotelluric sounding using Hawaii-to-California submarine cable data, J. geophys. Res., 100(B9), 17 837-17 854.
29. Martinec, Z., 1999. Spectral-finite element approach to three-dimensional electromagnetic induction in a spherical Earth, Geophys. J. Int., 136, 229-250.
30. Medford, L.V., Lanzerotti, L.J., Kraus, J.S. & Maclennan, C.G., 1989. Transatlantic earth potential variations during the March 1989 magnetic storm, Geophys. Res. Lett., 16, 1145-1148.
31. Neal, S.L., Mackie, R.L., Larsen, J.C. & Schultz, A., 2000. Variations in the electrical conductivity of the upper mantle beneath North America and the Pacific Ocean, J. geophys. Res., 105(B4), 8229-8242.
32. Oldenburg, D.W. & Ellis, R.G., 1991. Inversion of geophysical data using an approximate inverse mapping, Geophys. J. Int., 105, 325-353.
33. Olsen, N., 1998. The electrical conductivity of the mantle beneath Europe derived from C-responses from 3 h to 720 h, Geophys. J. Int. 133, 298-308.
34. Olsen, N., 1999. Induction studies with satellite data, Surv. Geophys., 20, 309-340.
35. Pankratov, O.V., Avdeev, D.B. & Kuvshinov, A.V., 1995. Electromagnetic field scattering in a heterogeneous earth: A solution to the forward problem, Phys. Solid Earth, 31, 201-209 (English edition).
36. Pankratov, O.V., Kuvshinov, A.V. & Avdeev, D.B., 1997. High-performance three-dimensional electromagnetic modeling using modified Neumann series. Anisotropic case, J. Geomagn. Geoelectr, 49, 1541-1547.
37. Roberts, R.S., 1984. The long-period electromagnetic response of the earth, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 78, 547-572.
38. Monteiro Santos, F.A.M., Soares, A., Nolasco, R., Rodriges, H., Luzio, R., Palshin, N., and ISO-3D team, 2003. Lithosphere conductivity structure using the CAM-1 (Lisbon-Madeira) submarine cable, Geophys. J. Int., 155, 591-600.
39. Schmucker, U., 1985. Magnetic and electric fields due to electromagnetic induction by external sources, electrical properties of the earth interior, in Landolt Boernstein New Series Group V, 2b, Springer, Berlin.
40. Schmucker, U., 1999. A spherical harmonic analysis of solar daily variations in the years 1964-1965: response estimates and source fields for global induction-I. Methods, Geophys. J. Int., 136, 439-454.
41. Schultz, A. & Larsen, J.C., 1987. On the electrical conductivity of the mid-mantle: I. Calculation of equivalent scalar MT response functions, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 88, 733-761.
42. Schultz, A. & Larsen, J.C., 1990. On the electrical conductivity of the mid-mantle: II. Delineation of heterogeneity by application of extremal inverse solutions, Geophys. J. Int., 101, 565-580.
43. Schultz, A., Kurtz, R.D., Chave, A.D. & Jones, A.G., 1993. Conductivity discontinuities in the upper mantle beneath a stable craton, Geophys. Res. Lett., 20, 2941-2944.
44. Semenov, V.Yu., 1998. Regional conductivity structures of the Earth's mantle, Publications of the Institute of Geophysics of Polish Academy of Sciences, C-65(302), Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw.
45. Singer, B.Sh., 1995. Method for solution of Maxwell's equations in non-uniform media, Geophys. J. Int., 120, 590-598.
46. Singer, B.Sh. & Fainberg, E.B., 1985. Electromagnetic Induction in Non-uniform Thin Layers, IZMIRAN, Moscow (in Russian).
47. Singer, B.Sh. & Fainberg, E.B., 1995. Generalization of the iterative-dissipative method for modeling electromagnetic fields in nonuniform media with displacement currents, J. appl. Geophys., 34, 41-46.
48. Singer, B.Sh. & Fainberg, E.B., 1997. Fast and stable method for 3-D modelling of electromagnetic field, Explor Geophys., 28, 130-135.
49. Singer, B.Sh., Mezzatesta, A. & Wang, I., 1999. 3D IDM modeling of EM field, in Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on 3-D Electromagnetics, Salt Lake City, Utah, pp. 29-33.
50. Vanyan, L.L., Palshin, N.A., Semenov, V.Yu. & Winch, D., 1994. Deep magnetotelluric sounding with the use of the Australia-New Zealand submarine cable. 1. Analysis of experimental data, Phys. Solid Earth 30, 836-838 (English translation).
51. Vanyan, L.L., Palshin, N.A. & Repin, I.A., 1995. Deep magnetotelluric sounding with the use of the Australia-New Zealand submarine cable. 2. Interpretation, Phys. Solid Earth, 31, 417-421 (English translation).
52. Utada, H., Koyama, T., Shimizu, H. & Chave, A.D., 2003. A semi-global reference model for electrical conductivity in the mid-mantle beneath the north Pacific region, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30(4), doi:10.1029/2002GL016092.
53. Uyeshima, M. & Schultz, A., 2000. Geoelectromagnetic induction in a heterogeneous sphere: a new 3-D forward solver using a staggered-grid integral formulation, Geophys. J. Int., 140, 636-650.
54. Weiss, C.J. & Everett, M.E., 1998. Geomagnetic induction in a heterogeneous sphere: fully three-dimensional test computations and the response of a realistic distribution of oceans and continents, Geophys. J. Int., 135, 650-662.
55. Wessel, P. & Smith, W.H.F., 1998. New, improved version of the Generic Mapping Tools released, EOS, Trans. Am. geophys. Un., 79, 579.
56. Yoshimura, R. & Oshiman, N., 2002. Edge-based finite element approach to the simulation of geoelectromagnetic induction in a 3-D sphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29(2), doi:10.1029 /2001GL014121.
57. Zhang, S.-L., 1997. GPBi-CG: generalized product-type methods based on Bi-CG for solving nonsymmetric linear systems, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 18, 537-551.
58. Zhdanov, M.S., Dmitriev, V.I., Fang, S. & Hursan, G., 2000. Quasi-analytical approximations and series in electromagnetic modeling, Geophysics, 65, 1746-1757.
59. Zhou, L. & Walker, H.F., 1994. Residual smoothing techniques for iterative methods, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 15, 297-312.