The development of a symptom questionnaire for assessing virtual reality viewing using a head-mounted display

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 82, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 168-176

  Ames, Shelly L ^a   Wolffsohn, James S ^a   Mcbrien, Neville A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

HMD; Questionnaire; Subject priming; Symptoms; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS; DATA REDUCTION; HEALTH HAZARDS; HELMET MOUNTED DISPLAYS; SURVEYS;

HEAD-MOUNTED DISPLAYS; HEADACHE; OCULAR DISCOMFORTS; OPTOMETRY;

VIRTUAL REALITY;

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISPLAY SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE DISPLAY; MALE; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PILOT STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; SYMPTOM; VIRTUAL REALITY; VIRTUAL REALITY SYMPTOM QUESTIONNAIRE;

ADULT; ASTHENOPIA; DATA DISPLAY; FEMALE; HEAD; HEADACHE; HUMANS; MALE; PILOT PROJECTS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VISION DISORDERS;

EID: 15044338918     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.OPX.0000156307.95086.6     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Mon-Williams M, Wann JP, Rushton S. Binocular vision in a virtual world: visual deficits following the wearing of a head-mounted display. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1993;13:387-91.
2. Rushton S, Mon-Williams M, Wann JP. Binocular vision in a biocular world: new-generation head-mounted displays avoid causing visual deficit. Displays 1994;15:255-60.
3. Oohira A, Ochiai M. Influence on visual function by a stereoscopic TV programme with binocular liquid crystal shutter and Hi-Vision TV display. Ergonomics 1996;39:1310-4.
4. Hasebe H, Oyamada H, Ukai K, Toda H, Bando T. Changes in oculomotor functions before and after loading of a 3-D visually-guided task by using a head-mounted display. Ergonomics 1996;39:1330-43.
5. Costello P, Howarth P, The visual effects of immersion in four virtual environments. VISERG Report 9604. September 24, 1996. Available at: http://www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/hu/groups/viserg/9604all.htm. Accessed December 16, 2004.
6. Howarth PA, Costello PJ. The occurrence of virtual simulation sickness symptoms when an HMD was used as a personal viewing system. Displays 1997;18:107-16.
7. GanNichida T, Ervin A, Gemmill MC, Drack A, Holt PH, Lynn M. Ophthalmic changes associated with symptom reports after use of head-mounted display (HMD). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:S58.
8. Howarth PA, Finch M. The nauseogenicity of two methods of navigating within a virtual environment. Appl Ergon 1999;30:39-45.
9. GanNichida T, Ervin A, Gemmill MC, Lynn M, Drack A, Holt PH, Stulting R. Are ophthalmic changes after HMD use associated with age? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:S393.
10. Hoshino M, Takahashi M, Oyamada K, Ohmi M, Yoshizawa T. Body sway induced by 3D images. In: Fisher SS, Merritt JO, Bolas MT, eds. Stereoscopic Displays and Virtual Reality Systems IV: Proceedings of the SPIE, vol 3012. Bellingham, WA: SPIE Press, 1997:400-7.
11. Cobb SV, Nichols S, Ramsey A, Wilson JR. Virtual Reality induced symptoms and effects (VRISE). Presence Teleop Virt 1999;8:169-86.
12. Nichols S. Physical ergonomics of virtual environment use. Appl Ergon 1999;30:79-90.
13. Heuer H, Bruwer M, Romer T, Kroger H, Knapp H. Preferred vertical gaze direction and observation distance. Ergonomics 1991;34:379-92.
14. Isensee SH, Bennett CA. The perception of flicker and glare on computer CRT displays. Hum Factors 1983;25:177-84.
15. Leibowitz HW, Owens DA. Night myopia and the intermediate dark focus of accommodation. J Opt Soc Am 1975;65:1121-8.
16. Charman WN, Tucker J. Dependence of accommodation response on the spatial frequency spectrum of the observed object. Vision Res 1977;17:129-39.
17. Reason JT. Motion sickness adaptation: a neural mismatch model. J R Soc Med 1978;71:819-29.
18. Yeh YY, Silverstein LD. Limits of fusion and depth judgement in stereoscopic color displays. Hum Factors 1990;32:45-60.
19. Wilson JR. Effects of participating in virtual environments - a review of current knowledge. Safety Sci 1996;23:39-51.
20. Kennedy RS, Jones MB, Lilienthal MG, Harm DL. Profile analysis of after-effects experienced during exposure to several virtual reality environments. In: Proceedings of the 76th Aerospace Medical Panel Meeting on Virtual Interfaces: Research and Applications 18-22 October 1993; Lisbon, Portugal; Lisbon: AGARD, 1993:2.1-2.9.
21. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 9241-3. Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs). Part 3: Visual Display Requirements. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 1992.
22. Regan EC, Price KR. The frequency of occurrence and severity of side-effects of immersion virtual reality. Aviat Space Environ Med 1994;65:527-30.
23. Regan E. Some evidence of adaptation to immersion in virtual reality. Displays 1995;16:135-9.
24. Regan EC, Ramsey AD. The efficacy of hyoscine hydrobromide in reducing side-effects induced during immersion in virtual reality. Aviat Space Environ Med 1996;67:222-6.
25. Krebs WK, Kaiser JP, Darken RP, Sinai MJ, McCarley JS. Visual deficits following prolonged exposure in a virtual environment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:S433.
26. Kennedy RS, Lane NE. Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: an enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. Int J Aviat Psychol 1993;3:203-30.
27. Kolasinski EM, Gilson RD. Ataxia following exposure to a virtual environment. Aviat Space Environ Med 1999;70:264-9.
28. Peli E. The visual effects of head-mounted display (HMD) are not distinguishable from those of desk-top computer display. Vision Res 1998;38:2053-66.
29. Mon-Williams M, Wann JP. Binocular virtual reality displays: when problems do and don't occur. Hum Factors 1998;40:42-9.
30. Ijsselsteijn W, de Ridder H, Hamberg R, Bouwhuis D, Freeman J. Perceived depth and the feeling of presence in 3DTV. Displays 1998;18:207-14.
31. Kolasinski E. Prediction of simulator sickness in a virtual environment [PhD Thesis]. University of Central Florida; Orlando, Florida; 1996.
32. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to their Development and Use, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
33. Miller GA. The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psych Rev 1956;63:81-97.
34. Munzel U, Hauschke D. A nonparametric test for proving noninferiority in clinical trials with ordered categorical data. Pharm Stat 2003;2:31-7.
35. Wellek S, Hampel B. A distribution-free two-sample equivalence test allowing for tied observations. Biometrical J 1999;41:171-86.
36. Nunnally JC. Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
37. Kline P. A Handbook of Test Construction: Introduction to Psychometric Design. London: Methuen, 1986.
38. Regan E. Some side effects of immersion virtual reality. Virtual interfaces. In: Proceedings of the 76th Aerospace Medical Panel Meeting on Virtual Interfaces: Research and Applications; October 18-22, 1993; Lisbon, Portugal. Lisbon: AGARD, 1993.