The use of SSRs for predicting the hybrid yield and yield heterosis in 15 key inbred lines of Chinese maize

Hereditas

Volumn 141, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 207-215

  Xu, Su Xia ^a   Liu, Jie ^a   Liu, Gong She ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGAROSE;

ALLELE; ARTICLE; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; CROSS BREEDING; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC DISTANCE; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETIC SIMILARITY; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HETEROSIS; HYBRID; INBRED STRAIN; MAIZE; NONHUMAN; PEDIGREE; PREDICTION; SAMPLE; SIMPLE SEQUENCE REPEAT;

DNA, PLANT; HYBRID VIGOR; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; MINISATELLITE REPEATS; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; ZEA MAYS;

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 14944359502     PISSN: 00180661     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.2004.01865.x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Ajmone, P. M., Castiglioni, P., Fusari, F. et al. 1998. Genetic diversity and its relationship to hybrid performance in maize as revealed by RFLP and AFLP markers. - Theor. Appl. Genet. 96: 219-227.
2. Bernardo, R. 1992. Relationship between single-cross performance and molecular marker heterozygosisty. - Theor. Appl. Genet. 83: 628-634.
3. Cai, C. H. and Zhuang, Y. L. 2001. SPSS V9.0 for windows. - Hope Electric Press, Beijing, China.
4. 1 and its parent. - Chin. Sci. Bull. 41: 451-454.
5. Cheng, N. H., Gao, Y. P., Yang, J. S. et al. 1997. Alteration of gene expression in rice hybrid F1 and its parental seedlings. - Acta. Bot. Sin. 39: 379-382.
6. Chi, S. M. and Liu, Z. Z. 1995. Heterosis group analysis or several common corn (Zea mays L.) inbred lines. - J. Hebei Agri. Univ. 18: 22-26.
7. Chin, E. C. L., Senior, M. L., Shu, H. et al. 1996. Maize simple repetitive sequences: abundance and allele variation. - Genome 39: 866-873.
8. Drinic, S. M., Trifunovic, S., Drinic, G. et al. 2002. Genetic divergence and its correlation to heterosis in maize as revealed by SSR-based makers. - Maydica 47: 1-8.
9. Frei, O. M., Stuber, C. W. and Goodman, M. M. 1986. Uses of allozymes as genetic markers for predicting performance in maize single-cross hybrids. - Crop Sci. 26: 37-42.
10. Godshalk, E. B., Lee, M. and Lanikey, K. R. 1990. Relationship of restriction fragment length polymorphisms to single-cross hybrid performance of maize. - Theor. Appl. Genet. 80: 273-280.
11. Hadjinov, M. I., Sherbak, V. S., Benko, N. I. et al. 1980. Interrelationships between isozyme diversity and combining ability in maize lines. - Maydica 27: 135-149.
12. Hallauer, A. R., Russel, W. A. and Lamkey, K. R. 1988. Corn breeding. - In: Agronomy monograph 18, Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. pp. 463-564.
13. Lamkey, K. R., Hallauer, A. R. and Kahler, A. L. 1987. Allelic differences at enzyme loci and hybrid performance in maize. - J. Hered. 78: 231-234.
14. Lee, M., Godshakl, E. B., Lamkey, K. R. et al. 1989. Association of restriction fragment length polymorphisms among maize inbreds with agronomic performance of their crosses. - Crop Sci. 29: 1067-1071.
15. Li, X. H., Fu, J. H., Zhang, S. H. et al. 2000. Genetic variation of inbred lines of maize detected by SSR markers. - Sci. Agri. Sin. 33: 19.
16. Liu, X. Z., Peng, Z. B., Fu, J. H. et al. 1998. Compared study of molecular marker with two normal methods for maize inbred lines grouping. - Acta. Agri. Boreali-Sin. 13: 36-41.
17. Livini, C., Ajmone, M. P., Melchinger, A. E. et al. 1992. Genetic diversity of maize inbred lines within and among heterotic groups revealed by RFLP. - Theor. Appl. Genet. 84: 17-25.
18. Melchinger, A. E., Lee, M., Lamkey, K. R. et al. 1990. Genetic diversity for restriction fragment length polymorphisms and heterosis for two diallel sets of maize inbreds. - Theor. Appl. Genet. 80: 488-496.
19. Melchinger, A. E., Boppenmaier, J., Dhillon, B. S. et al. 1992. Genetic diversity for RFLPs in European maize inbreds. II. Relation to performance of hybrids within versus between heterotic group for forage traits. - Theor. Appl. Genet. 84: 672-681.
20. Mumm, R. H. and Dudley, J. W. 1994. A classification of 148 U.S. maize inbreds. I. Cluster analysis based on RFLPs. - Crop Sci. 34: 842-851.
21. Morgante, M. and Olivieri, A. M. 1993. PCR-amplified microsatellites as markers in plant genetics. - Plant J. 3: 175-182.
22. Nei, M. and Li, W. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. - Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 76: 5256-5273.
23. Ramesh, V. K., Zeng, X. P., Jeffrey, L. et al. 1995. Assessment of genetic diversity in dent and popcorn (Zea mays L.) inbred lines using inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) amplification. - Mol. Breed. 1: 365-373.
24. Rohlf, F. J. 1994. NTSYS-pc, Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, V.1.80. - Exeter Software, New York.
25. Saal, B. and Wricke, G. 1999. Development of simple sequence repeat markers in rye (Secale cereale L.). - Genome 42: 964-972.
26. Saghai-Maroof, M. A., Biyashev, R. M., Yang, G. P. et al. 1994. Extraordinarily polymorphic microsatellite DNA in barley: species diversity, chromosomal location and population dynamics. - Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 91: 5466-5470.
27. Schwartz, D. 1960. Genetic studies of mutant isozymes in maize. - Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 88: 1202-1206.
28. Senior, M. L., Chin, E. C. L., Lee, M. et al. 1996. Simple sequence repeat markers developed from maize sequences found in the GENBANK database: map construction. - Crop Sci. 36: 1676-1683.
29. Senior, M. L., Murphy, J. P., Goodman, M. M. et al. 1998. Utility of SSRs for determining genetic similarities and relationships in maize using an agarose gel system. - Crop Sci. 38: 1088-1098.
30. Smith, J. S. C. and Smith, O. S. 1989. Comparison of heterosis among hybrids as a measure of relatedness with that to be expected on the basis of pedigree. - Maize Genet. Coop. Newsl. 63: 86-87.
31. Smith, J. S. C., Chin, E. C. L., Shu, H. et al. 1997. An evaluation of the utility of SSR loci as molecular markers in maize ( Zea mays L.): comparisons with data from RFLPS and pedigree. - Theor. Appl. Genet. 95: 163-173.
32. 1 grain yield, grain yield, heterosis, and RFLPs. - Theor. Appl. Genet. 80: 833-840.
33. Smith, O. S., Sullivan, H., Hobart, B. et al. 2000. Evalution of a divergent set of SSR markers to predict F1 grain yield performance and grain yield heterosis in maize. - Maydica 45: 235-241.
34. Stuber, C. W., Moll, R. H., Goodman, M. M. et al. 1980. Allozyme frequency changes associated with selection for increased grain yield in maize (Zea mays L.). - Genetics. 95: 225-236.
35. Stuber, C. W., Lincoln, S. E., Wolff, D. W. et al. 1992. Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a bybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. - Genetics 132: 823-839.
36. Sun, G. L., William, J., Liu, K. J. et al. 2001. Microsatellite and RAPD polymorphisms in Ontario corn hybrids are related to the commercial sources and maturity ratings. - Mol. Breed. 7: 13-24.
37. Taramino, G. and Tingey, S. 1996. Simple sequence repeats for germplasm analysis and mapping in maize. - Genome 39: 277-287.
38. Tautz, D. 1989. Hypervariability of simple sequences as a general source for polymorphic DNA. - Nucl. Acids Res. 17: 6463-6471.
39. Wu, C. F. 1983. A review on the germplasm bases of the main corn. - Sci. Agri. Sin. 2: 1-8.
40. Wu, M. S. and Dai, J. R. 2000. Molecular marker heterozygosity and its relationship to hybrid performance in seventeen elite maize inbreds, Acta Bot. Boreal. - Occident. Sin. 20: 691-700.
41. Zischler, H., Nanda, I. and Schafer, R. 1989. Digoxigehated oligoneleotide probes specific for simple repeats in DNA fingerprinting and hybridization in situ. - Hum. Genet. 82: 227-233.