New design of Simulated Moving Bed (SMB) for ternary separations

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 44, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 1906-1913

  Jin, Seok Hur ^a   Wankat, Phillip C ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHROMATOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MIXTURES; PHENOLS; SEPARATION;

EQUILIBRIUM MODELS; HYBRID SYSTEMS; SIMULTED MOVING BEDS (SMB); TERNARY SEPARATIONS;

TERNARY SYSTEMS;

CARBOHYDRATE DERIVATIVE; PHENOL DERIVATIVE;

CHROMATOGRAPHY; DESIGN; MOVING BED REGIME; SEPARATION;

ARTICLE; CHROMATOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HYBRID; SIMULATION;

EID: 14844359384     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie040164e     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Wankat, P. C. Large-Scale Adsorption and Chromatography; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1986; Chapter 6.
2. Broughton, D. B. Molex: Case History of a Process. Chem. Eng. Prog. 1968, 64(8), 60.
3. Pynnonen, B. Simulated Moving Bed Processing: Escape from the High-Cost Box. J. Chromatogr. 1998, 827, 149.
4. Nicoud, R. M. Simulated Moving-Bed Chromatography for Biomolecules. In Handbook of Bioseparations; Ahuja, S., Ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, 2000; pp 475-509.
5. Ma, Z.; Wang, N.-H. Design of Simulated Moving Bed Chromatography Using Standing Wave Analysis: Linear System. AIChE J. 1997, 42, 22488.
6. Mazzotti, M.; Storti, G.; Morbidelli, M. Optimal Operation of Simulated Moving Bed Units for Nonlinear Chromatographic Separations. J. Chromatogr. 1997, 769, 3.
7. Schmidt-Traub, H.; Strube, J. Dynamic Simulation of Simulated-Moving-Bed Chromatographic Processes. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1996, 20, S641.
8. Chiang, A. S. T. Continuous Chromatographic Process Based on SMB Technology. AIChE J. 1998, 44, 1930.
9. Rossiter, G. J. ISEP & CSEP: A Novel Separation Technique for Process Engineers. Israeli Mining Institution Meeting, Tel Aviv, Israel, Dec 1996.
10. Nicolaos, A.; Muhr, L.; Gotteland, P.; Nicoud, R. M.; Bailly, M. Application of Equilibrium Theory to Ternary Moving Bed Configurations (four+four, five+four, eight and nine zones): I. Linear Case. J. Chromatogr. 2001, 908, 71.
11. Nicolaos, A.; Muhr, L.; Gotteland, P.; Nicoud, R. M.; Bailly, M. Application of Equilibrium The Theory to Ternary Moving Bed Configurations (4+4, 5+4, 8 and 9 zones): II. Langmuir Case. J. Chromatogr. 2001, 908, 87.
12. Wankat, P. C. Simulated Moving Bed Cascades for Ternary Separations. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2001, 40, 6185.
13. Masuda, T.; Sonobe, T.; Matsuda, F.; Horie, M. Process for Fractional Separation of Multi-Component Fluid Mixture. U.S. Patent 5,198,120, 1993.
14. Wooley, R.; Ma, Z.; Wang, N.-H. L. A Nine-Zone Simulating Moving Bed for the Recovery of Glucose and Xylose from Biomass Hydrolyzate. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1998, 37, 3699.
15. Beste, Y. A.; Arlt, W. Side-Stream Simulated Moving-Bed Chromatography for Multicomponent Separation. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2002, 25, 956.
16. Kim, J. K.; Zang, Y.; Wankat, P. C. Single-Cascade Simulated Moving Bed Systems for the Separation of Ternary Mixtures. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2004, 42, 4849.
17. Abel, S.; Babler, M. U.; Arpagaus, C.; Mazzotti, M.; Stadler, J. Two-Fraction and Three Fraction Continuous Simulated Moving Bed Separation of Nucleosides. J. Chromatogr. 2004, 1043, 201.
18. Paraedes, G.; Abel, S.; Babler, M. U.; Mazzotti, M.; Morbidelli, M.; Stadler, J. Analysis of a Simulated Moving Bed Operation for Three-Fraction Separations (3F-SMB). Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2004, 43, 6157.
19. Jin, W.; Wankat, P. C. Two-Zone SMB Process for Binary Separation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., in press.
20. Wankat, P. C. Rate-Controlled Separations; Khiwer. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1990; Chapter 6.
21. Zang, Y.; Wankat, P. C. Three-Zone Simulated Bed with Partial Feed and Selective Withdrawal. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2002, 41, 5283.
22. Aspen Chromatography 11.1: Chromatography Reference Guide; Aspen Technology: 2001; pp 3-5.
23. Migliorini, C.; Mazzotti, M.; Morbidelli, M. Continuous Chromatographic Separation Through Simulated Moving Beds Under Linear and Nonlinear Conditions. J. Chromatogr. 1998, 827, 161.
24. Lisec, O.; Hugo, P.; Seidel-Morgenstern, A. Frontal Analysis Method to Determine Competitive Adsorption Isotherms. J. Chromatogr. 2001, 908, 19.
25. Ruthven, D. M.; Ching, C. B. Counter-Current and Simulated Counter-Current Adsorption Separation Processes. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1989, 44, 1011.
26. Zhong, G.; Guiochon, G. Analytical Solution For The Linear Ideal Model of Simulated Bed Chromatography. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1996, 51, 4307.
27. Ching, C. B.; Chu, K. H.; Hidajat, K.; Uddin, M. S. Comparative Study of Flow Schemes for a Simulated Countercurrent Adsorption Separation Process. AIChE J. 1992, 38, 1744.
28. Dunnebier, G.; Weirich, I.; Klatt, K. U. Computationally Efficient Dynamic Modeling and Simulation of Simulated Moving Bed Chromatographic Processes with Linear Isotherms. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1998, 53, 2537.
29. Kim, J. K.; Wankat, P. C. Scaling and Intensification Procedures for Simulated Moving-Bed Systems. AIChE J. 2003, 49, 2810.