Seedling drought tolerance in upland cotton

Crop Science

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 766-771

  Basal, H ^a   Smith, C W ^b   Thaxton, P S ^b   Hemphill, J K ^b  

^a ADNAN MENDERES UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 14844358336     PISSN: 0011183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2005.0766     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Ackerson, R.C. 1980. Stomatal response of cotton to water stress and abscisic acid as affected by water stress history. Plant Physiol. 69: 455-459.
2. Anderson, B.E., J.M. Ward, and J.I. Schroeder. 1994. Evidence for an extracellular reception site for abscisic acid in Commelina guard cells. Plant Physiol. 104:1177-1183.
3. Ball, R.A., D.M. Oosterhuis, and A. Mauromoustakos. 1994. Growth dynamics of the cotton plant during water-deficit stress. Agron. J. 86:788-795.
4. 2 populations. Crop Sci. 43:1983-1988.
5. Bland, W.L., and W.A. Dugas. 1989. Cotton root growth and soil water extraction. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 53:1850-1855.
6. Borel, C., and T. Simonneau. 2002. Is the ABA concentration in the sap collected by pressurizing leaves relevant for analyzing drought effects on stomata? Evidence from ABA-fed leaves of transgenic plants with modified capacities to synthesize ABA. J. Exp. Bot. 53(367):287-296.
7. Chaves, M.M., and M.L. Rodrigues. 1987. Photosynthesis and water relation in grapevines. Responses to environmental factors. p. 379-390. In J.D. Tenhunen et al. (ed.) Plant response to stress, functional analyses in Mediterranean ecosystem. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
8. Clarke, J.M., I. Romagosa, S. Jana, J.P. Srivastava, and T.N. McCaig. 1989. Relationship of excised-leaf water loss rate and yield of durum wheat in diverse environments. Can. J. Plant Sci. 69:1075-1081.
9. Cook, C.G. 1985. Identifying root traits among MAR and non-MAR cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. cultivars that relate to performance under limited moisture conditions. Master's Thesis submitted to Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
10. Creelman, R.A., H.S. Mason, R.J. Bensen, J.S. Boyer, and J.E. Mullet. 1990. Water deficit and abscisic acid cause differential inhibition of shoot versus root growth in soybean seedlings. Plant Physiol. 92:205-214.
11. Cushman, J.C., and H.J. Bohnert. 2000. Genomic approaches to plant stress tolerance. Plant Biol. 3:117-124.
12. De Souze, J.G., and J. Vieria da Suva. 1987. Partitioning of carbohydrates in annual and perennial cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). J. Exp. Bot. 38:1211-1218.
13. Fambrini, M., P. Vernieri, M.L. Toncelli, V.D. Rossi, and C. Pugliesi. 1995. Characterization of a wilty sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) mutant. III. Phenotypic interaction in reciprocal grafts from wilty mutant and wild-type plants. J. Exp. Bot. 46:525-530.
14. Fernandez, C.J., and K.J. McCree. 1991. Visualizing differences in plant water dynmics with a simulation model. Crop Sci. 31:399-404.
15. Franca, M.G.C., A.T.P. Thi, C. Pimentai, R.O.P. Rossiello, Y.Z. Fodil, and D. Laffary. 2000. Differences growth and water relations among Phaseolus vulgaris cultivars in response to induced drought stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 43:227-237.
16. Hartung, W., S. Wilkinson, and W.J. Davis. 1989. Factors that regulate abscisic acid concentrations at the primary site of action at the guard cell. J. Exp. Bot. 49:361-367.
17. Kurd, E.A., and E.D. Spratt. 1975. Root patterns in crops related to water and nutrition uptake, p. 167-235. In U.S. Gupta (ed.) Physiological aspects of dryland farming. Oxford & IBH Publ. Co., New Delhi.
18. Ingram, J., and D. Bartels. 1996. The molecular basis of dehydration tolerance in plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 47:377-403.
19. Jordan, W.R., P.J. Shouse, A. Blum, F.R. Miller, and R.L. Monk. 1984. Environmental physiology of sorghum: II. Epicuticular wax load and cuticular transpiration. Crop Sci. 24:1168-1173.
20. Kasperbauer, M.J. 1999. Cotton seedling root growth response to light reflected to the shoots from straw-covered versus bare soil. Crop Sci. 39:164-167.
21. Kumar, A., and D.P. Singh. 1998. Use of physiological indices as a screening technique for drought tolerance in oilseed Brassica species. Ann. Bot. 81:413-420.
22. Leidi, E.O., M. Lopez, J. Gorham, and J.C. Gutierrez. 1999. Variation in carbon isotope discrimination and other traits to drought tolerance in upland cotton cultivars under dryland conditions. Field Crops Res. 61:109-123.
23. Levitt, J. 1980. Responses of plants to environmental stress. Vol. II. Water, Radiation, Salt and Others. Academic Press, New York.
24. Ludlow, M.M. 1980. Adaptive significance of stomatal response to water stress, p. 123-138. In N.C. Turner and P.J. Kramer (ed.) Adaptation of Plants to Water and High Temperature Stress. Wiley & Sons, New York.
25. Malik, R.S., J.S. Dhankar, and N.C. Turner. 1979. Influence of soil water deficits on root growth of cotton seedlings. Plant Soil 53:109-115.
26. McCaig, T.N., and I. Romagosa. 1989. Measurement and use of excised-leaf water status in wheat. Crop Sci. 29:1140-1145.
27. McMichael, B.L., D.M. Oosterhuis, J.C. Zak, and C.A. Beyrouty. 1999. Growth and development of root system. In J.M. Stewart et al. (ed.) Cotton Physiology. Book II. National Cotton Council, Memphis, TN.
28. McMichael, B.L., and J.E. Quisenberry. 1991. Genetic variation for root-shoot relationship among cotton germplasm. Environ. Exp. Bot. 31:461-470.
29. Nepomuceno, A.L., D.M. Oosterhuis, and J.M. Stewart. 1998. Physiological response of cotton leaves and roots to water deficit induced by polyethylene glycol. Environ. Exp. Bot. 40(1):29-41.
30. Pace, P.F., H.T. Cralle, S.H.M. El-Halawany, J.T. Cothren, and S.A. Senseman. 1999. Drought-induced changes in shoot and root growth of young cotton plants. J. Cotton Sci. 3:183-187.
31. Flaut, Z., A. Carmi, and A. Grava. 1996. Cotton root and shoot response to subsurface drip irrigation and partial wetting of the upper soil profile. Irrig. Sci. 16(3):107-113.
32. Prior, S.A., H.H. Rogers, G.B. Runion, B.A. Kimball, J.R. Mauney, K.F. Lewin, J. Nagy, and G.R. Hendry. 1995. Free-air carbon dioxide enrichment of cotton: Root morphological characteristics. J. Environ. Qual. 24:678-683.
33. Quisenberry, J.E., W.R. Jordan, B.A. Roark, and D.W. Fryrear. 1981. Exotic cotton as genetic sources for drought resistance. Crop Sci. 21:889-895.
34. Quisenberry, J.E., B. Roark, and B.L. McMichael. 1982. Use of transpiration decline curves to identify drought-tolerant cotton germplasm. Crop Sci. 22:918-922.
35. Roark, B., J.E. Quisenberry, and J.E. Friesen. 1975. Rate of water loss from detached leaves of cultivars of upland cotton, p. 72. In Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Res. Conf. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.
36. Roark, B., and J.E. Quisenberry. 1977. Evaluation of cotton germplasm for drought resistance, p. 49-50. In Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Conf., Natl. Cotton Counc. Am. Memphis, TN.
37. Saab, I.N., and R.E. Sharp. 1989. Non-hydraulic signals from maize roots in drying soil: Inhibition of leaf elongation but not stomatal conductance. Planta 179:466-474.
38. Smith, C.W. 2003. Registration of TAM94L-25 and TAM94L-3 germplasm lines of upland cotton with improved fiber length. Crop Sci. 43:742-743.
39. Yang, R.C., S. Jana, and J.M. Clarke. 1991. Phenotypic diversity and association of some potentially drought-responsive characters in drum wheat. Crop Sci. 31:1484-1491.
40. Xu, H., L. Gauthier, and A. Gosselin. 1995. Stomatal and cuticular transpiration of greenhouse tomato plants in response to high solution electrical conductivity and low soil water content. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 120(3):417-422.
41. Winter, S.R., J.T. Musick, and K.B. Porter. 1988. Evaluation of screening techniques for breeding drought-resistant winter wheat. Crop Sci. 28:512-516.