Individual behaviour, space and predator evolution promote persistence in a two-patch system with predator switching

Evolutionary Ecology Research

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 53-71

  Kimbrell, Tristan ^a   Holt, Robert D ^a  

^a University of Florida ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Evolution; Individual based model; Memory; Optimal foraging; Predator switching; Undermatching

Indexed keywords

EID: 14844343734     PISSN: 15220613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Abrams, P.A. 1997. Evolutionary responses of foraging-related traits in unstable predator-prey systems. Evol. Ecol., 11: 673-686.
2. Abrams, P.A. 1999. The adaptive dynamics of consumer choice. Am. Nat., 153: 83-97.
3. Abrams, P.A. 2000. The impact of habitat selection on the spatial heterogeneity of resources in varying environments. Ecology, 81: 2902-2913.
4. Abrams, P.A. and Holt, R.D. 2002. The impact of consumer-resource cycles on the coexistence of competing consumers. Theor. Pop. Biol., 62: 281-295.
5. Abrams, P.A., Brassil, C.E. and Holt, R.D. 2003. Dynamics and responses to mortality rates of competing predators undergoing predator-prey cycles. Theor. Pop. Biol., 64: 163-176.
6. Fryxell, J.M. and Lundberg, P. 1994. Diet choice and predator-prey dynamics. Evol. Ecol., 8: 407-421.
7. Hassell, M.P. 2000. The Spatial and Temporal Dynamics of Host-Parasitoid Interactions. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Hirvonen, H., Ranta, E., Hannu, R. and Peuhkuri, N. 1999. Significance of memory properties in prey choice decisions. Ecol. Model., 115: 177-189.
9. Kennedy, M. and Gray, R.D. 1993. Can ecological theory predict the distribution of foraging animals? A critical analysis of experiments on the ideal free distribution. Oikos, 68: 158-166.
10. Křivan, V. 1996. Optimal foraging and predator-prey dynamics. Theor. Pop. Biol., 49: 265-290.
11. Křivan, V. 1997. Dynamic ideal free distribution: effects of optimal patch choice on predator-prey dynamics. Am. Nat., 149: 164-178.
12. Křivan, V. and Sikder, A. 1999. Optimal foraging and predator-prey dynamics, II. Theor. Pop. Biol., 55: 111-126.
13. Lomnicki, A. 1988. Population Ecology of Individuals. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14. McPeek, M.A. and Holt, R.D. 1992. The evolution of dispersal in spatially and temporally varying environments. Am Nat., 140: 1010-1027.
15. Murdoch, W.W. 1977. Stabilizing effects of spatial heterogeneity in predator-prey systems. Theor. Pop. Biol., 11: 252-273.
16. Murdoch, W.W. and Oaten, A. 1975. Predation and population stability. Adv. Ecol. Res., 9: 1-131.
17. Ranta, E., Lundberg, P. and Kaitala, V. 1999. Resource matching with limited knowledge. Oikos, 86: 383-385.
18. Rosenzweig, M.L. and MacArthur, R.H. 1963. Graphical representation and stability conditions of predator-prey interactions. Am. Nat., 97: 209-223.
19. Roughgarden, J. and Feldman, M.W. 1975. Species packing and predation pressure. Ecology, 56: 489-492.
20. Turchin, P. and Hanski, I. 1997. An empirically based model for latitudinal gradient in vole population dynamics. Am. Nat., 149: 842-874.
21. van Baalen, M., Křivan, V., van Rijn, P.C.J. and Sabelis, M.W. 2001. Alternative food, switching predators, and the persistence of predator-prey systems. Am. Nat., 157: 512-524.
22. Wilson, H.B., Hassell, M.P. and Holt, R.D. 1998. Persistence and area effects in a stochastic tritrophic model. Am. Nat., 151: 587-595.