Changes in homeowner preferences for housing density following 11 September 2001

Applied Economics Letters

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 73-78

  Roe, Brian ^a   Irwin, Elena G ^a   Morrow Jones, Hazel A ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HOUSING MARKET; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; TERRORISM;

FRANKLIN COUNTY [OHIO]; NORTH AMERICA; OHIO; UNITED STATES; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

EID: 14844342966     PISSN: 13504851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1350485042000307134     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Earnhart, D. (2001) Combining revealed and stated preference methods to value environmental amenities at residential locations, Land Economics, 77(1),12-29.
2. Hensher, D., Louviere, J. and Swait, J. (1999) Combining sources of preference data, Journal of Econometrics, 89(1-2), 197-221.
3. Louviere, J. J. (1988) Conjoint analysis modeling of stated preferences, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 22, 93-119.
4. Mills, E. S. (2002) Terrorism and US real estate, Journal of Urban Economics, 51, 198-204.
5. Molin, E. H. Oppewal and Timmermans, H. J. P. (1999) Group-based versus individual-based conjoint preference models of residential preferences: a comparative test, Environment and Planning A, 31, 1935-47.
6. Roe, B., Boyle, K. J. and Teisl, M. F. (1996) Using conjoint analysis to derive estimates of compensating variation, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 31, 145-59.
7. Roe, B., Irwin, E. G and Morrow-Jones, H. A. (2004) The effects of farmland, farmland preservation and other neighborhood amenities on proximate housing values: results of a conjoint analysis of housing choice, Land Econ. 80.
8. Rouwendal, J. and Meijer, E. (2001) Preferences for housing, jobs, and commuting: a mixed logit analysis, Journal of Regional Science, 41, 475-505.
9. Sunstein, C. R. (2003) Terrorism and probability neglect, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 26(2/3), 121-36.