Transcranial electrical stimulation as predictor of elicitation of intraoperative muscle-evoked potentials

Spine

Volumn 29, Issue 19, 2004, Pages 2153-2157

  Fukuoka, Yuko ^a   Komori, Hiromichi ^a   Kawabata, Shigenori ^a   Ohkubo, Harunobu ^a   Mochida, Kiyoshi ^a   Shinomiya, Kenichi ^a  

^a TOKYO MEDICAL AND DENTAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Motor evoked potential; Muscle evoked potential; Transcranial electrical stimulation; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CERVICAL MYELOPATHY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; FEMALE; FLEXOR HALLUCIS BREVIS; FLEXOR MUSCLE; HAND MUSCLE; HUMAN; JAPANESE ORTHOPEDIC ASSOCIATION SCORE; MALE; MOTOR NERVE CONDUCTION; NERVE STIMULATION; PATIENT MONITORING; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; TRANSCRANIAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

EID: 14844342720     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000141185.48145.82     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Pelosi L, Lamb J, Grevitt M, et al. Combined monitoring of motor and somatosensory evoked potentials in orthopaedic spinal surgery. Clin Neurophysiol 2002;113:-1082-91.
2. Burke D, Bartley K, Woodforth IJ, et al. The effects of a volatile anaesthetic on the excitability of human corticospinal axon. Brain 2000;123:992-1000.
3. Jones SJ, Harrison R, Koh KF, et al. Motor evoked potential monitoring during spinal surgery: responses of distal limb muscles to transcranial cortical stimulation with pulse trains. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1996;100:375-83.
4. Pechstein U, Nadstawek J, Zentner J, et al. Isoflurane plus nitrous oxide versus propofol for recording of motor evoked potentials after high frequency repetitive electrical stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998;108:175-81.
5. Pelosi L, Stevenson M, Odam L, et al. Intraoperative spinal cord monitoring: myogenic evoked potentials (MEPs) to transcranial electrical stimulation during different anaesthetic regimens. Clin Neurophysiol 2000:S59.
6. Pelosi L, Stevenson M, Hobbs GJ, et al. Intraoperative myogenic evoked potentials to transcranial electrical stimulation during different anaesthetic regimens. Clin Neurophysiol 2001;112:1076-87.
7. Bartley K, Woodforth IJ, Stephan JPH, et al. Corticospinal volleys and compound muscle action potentials produced by repetitive transcranial stimulation during spinal surgery. Clin Neurophysiol 2002;113:78-90.
8. Woodforth IJ, Hicks RG, Crawford MR, et al. Depression of I waves in corticospinal volleys by sevoflurane, thiopental and propofol. Anesth Analg 1999;89:1182-7.
9. Burke D, Hicks R, Stephan J, et al. Trial-to-trial variability of corticospinal volleys in human patients. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995;97: 231-7.
10. Herdmann J, Deletis V, Edmonds HL Jr, et al. Spinal cord and nerve root monitoring in spine surgery and related procedures. Spine 1996;21:879-85.
11. Patton HD, Amassian VE. Single and multiple unit analysis of cortical state of pyramidal tract activation. J Neurophysiol 1954;17:345-63.
12. Day BL, Rothwell JC, Thompson PD, et al. Motor cortex stimulation in intact man. 2. Multiple descending volleys. Brain 1987;110:1191-1209.
13. Di Lazzaro V, Oliviero A, Profice P, et al. Comparison of descending volleys evoked by transcranial magnetic and electric stimulation in conscious humans. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998;109:397-401.
14. Weber M, Eisen AA. Magnetic stimulation of the central and peripheral nervous systems. Muscle Nerve 2002;25:160-75.
15. Rothwell JC, Thompson PD, Day BL, et al. Motor cortex stimulation in intact man. 1. General characteristics of EMG responses in different muscles. Brain 1987;110:1173-90.
16. Priori A, Bertolasi L, Dressler D, et al. Transcranial electric and magnetic stimulation of the leg atea of the human motor cortex: single motor unit and surface EMG responses in the tibialis anterior muscle. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol l993;89:131-7.