Classification of dysphonic voice: Acoustic and auditory-perceptual measures

Journal of Voice

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 1-14

  Eadie, Tanya L ^a,b   Doyle, Philip C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Acoustic measures of voice; Acoustic prediction; Auditory perceptual scaling; Connected speech; Pathological voice quality

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY RESPONSE; CALCULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; DYSPHONIA; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; FEMALE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEARING; HUMAN; LINEAR SYSTEM; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MALE; NOISE; PHONATION; PREDICTION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RATING SCALE; READING; SPEECH; VOICE;

EID: 14844312914     PISSN: 08921997     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2004.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Davis S.B. Acoustic characteristics of normal and pathological voices. Lass N.K. Speech and Language: Advances in Basic Research and Practice. vol. 1:1979;271-335 Academic, New York
2. Avaaz Innovations Inc. Interactive Voice Analysis System (IVANS), Version 1.0 [Computer program]. 1998;Avaaz Innovations Inc, London, Ontario, Canada
3. Kay Elemetrics Corporation. Multidimensional voice program (MDVP) module, model 5105. 2000;Kay Elemetrics Corporation, Lincoln Park, NJ
4. Eskanazi L., Childers D.G., Hicks D.M. Acoustic correlates of vocal quality. J Speech Hear Res. 33:1990;298-306
5. Gelfer M.P. A multidimensional scaling study of voice quality in females. Phonetica. 50:1993;15-27
6. Kempster G., Kistler D.J., Hillenbrand J. Multidimensional scaling analysis of dysphonia in two speaker groups. J Speech Hear Res. 34:1991;534-543
7. Murry T., Singh S., Sargent M. Multidimensional classification of abnormal voice qualities. J Acoust Soc Am. 61:1977;1630-1635
8. Wolfe V., Cornell R., Palmer C. Acoustic correlates of pathologic voice types. J Speech Hear Res. 34:1991;509-516
9. Titze I. Summary statement. Workshop on Acoustic Voice Analysis. Denver, CO; 1995.
10. Rabinov C.R., Kreiman J., Gerratt B.R., Bielamowicz S. Comparing reliability of perceptual ratings of roughness and acoustic measure of jitter. J Speech Hear Res. 38:1995;26-32
11. Bielamowicz S., Kreiman J., Gerratt B.R., Dauer M.S., Berke G.S. Comparison of voice analysis systems for perturbation measurement. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 39:1996;126-134
12. Doherty E.T., Shipp T. Tape recorder effects on jitter and shimmer extraction. J Speech Hear Res. 31:1988;485-490
13. Titze I.R., Winholtz W.S. Effect of microphone type and placement on voice perturbation measures. J Speech Hear Res. 36:1993;1177-1190
14. Karnell M. Laryngeal perturbation analysis: minimum length of analysis window. J Speech Hear Res. 34:1991;544-548
15. o extraction algorithm for sustained vowels. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 42:1999;112-126
16. Callan D.E., Kent R.D., Roy N., Tasko S.M. Self-organizing map for the classification of normal and disordered female voices. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 42:1999;355-366
17. Kreiman J., Gerratt B.R., Kempster G.B., Erman A., Berke G.S. Perceptual evaluation of voice quality: review, tutorial, and a framework for research. J Speech Hear Res. 36:1993;21-40
18. de Krom G. Some spectral correlates of pathological breathy and rough voice quality for different types of vowel fragments. J Speech Hear Res. 38:1995;794-811
19. Hirano M. Clinical Examination of Voice. 1981;Springer-Verlag, New York
20. Gobl C., Karlsson I. Male and female voice source dynamics. Gauffin J., Hammarberg B. Vocal Fold Physiology: Acoustic, Perceptual, and Physiological Aspects of Voice Mechanisms. 1991;121-128 Singular, San Diego, CA
21. Löfqvist A., McGowan R.S. Voice source variations in running speech. Gauffin J., Hammarberg B. Vocal Fold Physiology: Acoustic, Perceptual, and Physiological Aspects of Voice Mechanisms. 1991;113-120 Singular, San Diego, CA
22. Klingholtz F. Acoustic recognition of voice disorders: a comparative study of running speech versus sustained vowels. J Acoust Soc Am. 87:1990;2218-2224
23. Martin D.P., Fitch J., Wolfe V. Pathologic voice type and the acoustic prediction of severity. J Speech Hear Res. 38:1995;765-771
24. Schoentgen J. Jitter in sustained vowels and isolated sentences produced by dysphonic speakers. Speech Commun. 8:1989;61-79
25. Wolfe V., Martin D. Acoustic correlates of dysphonia: type and severity. J Comm Dis. 30:1997;403-416
26. Parsa V., Jamieson D.G. Acoustic discrimination of pathological voice: sustained vowels versus continuous speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 44:2001;327-339
27. Qi Y., Milstein C., Hillman R.E. The estimation of signal-to-noise ratio in continuous speech for disordered voices. J Acoust Soc Am. 105:1999;2532-2535
28. Hillenbrand J., Houde R.A. Acoustic correlates of breathy vocal quality: dysphonic voices and continuous speech. J Speech Hear Res. 39:1996;311-321
29. Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary Voice and Speech Lab. Voice Disorder Database Model 4337. Boston, MA; 1994.
30. Michel J.F., Wendahl R. Correlates of voice production. Travis L.E. Handbook of Speech Pathology and Audiology. 1971;465-479 Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
31. Kent R.D. Hearing and believing: some limits to the auditory-perceptual assessment of speech and voice disorders. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 5:1996;7-23
32. Kreiman J., Gerratt B.R. Sources of listener disagreement in voice quality assessment. J Acoust Soc Am. 108:2000;1867-1876
33. Kreiman J., Gerratt B.R. Validity of rating scale measures of voice quality. J Acoust Soc Am. 104:1998;1598-1608
34. Gelfer M.P. Perceptual attributes of voice: development and use of rating scales. J Voice. 2:1988;320-326
35. Kreiman J., Gerratt B.R., Berke G.S. The multidimensional nature of pathologic vocal quality. J Acoust Soc Am. 96:1994;1291-1302
36. Gerratt B.R., Kreiman J. Measuring vocal quality with speech synthesis. J Acoust Soc Am. 110:2001;2560-2566
37. Gerratt B.R., Till J., Rosenbek J., Wertz R.T., Boysen A.E. Use and perceived value of perceptual and instrumental measures in dysarthria management. Moore C.A., Yorkston K.M., Beukelman D.R. Dysarthria and Apraxia of Speech. 1991;77-93 Paul Brookes, Baltimore
38. Reich A.R., Lerman J.W. Teflon laryngoplasty: an acoustical and perceptual study. J Speech Hear Dis. 153:1978;496-505
39. Roy N., Weinrich B., Gray S.D., Tanner K., Stemple J.C., Sapienza C.M. Three treatments for teachers with voice disorders: a randomized clinical trial. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 46:2003;670-688
40. Eadie T.L., Doyle P.C. Direct magnitude estimation and interval scaling of pleasantness and severity in dysphonic and normal speakers. J Acoust Soc Am. 112:2002;3014-3021
41. Doyle P.C., Leeper H.A., Houghton-Jones C., Heeneman H., Martin G.F. Perceptual characteristics of hemilaryngectomized and near-total laryngectomized male speakers. J Med Speech-Lang Pathol. 3:1995;131-143
42. Perrin E., Berger-Vachon C., Topouzkhanian A., Truy E., Morgon A. Evaluation of cochlear implanted children's voices. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 47:1999;181-186
43. Fairbanks G. Voice and Articulation Drillbook. 2nd ed:1960;Harper, New York
44. Whitehill T.L., Lee A.S.Y., Chun J.C. Direct magnitude estimation and interval scaling of hypernasality. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 45:2002;80-88
45. Weismer G., Laures J.S. Direct magnitude estimates of speech intelligibility in dysarthria: effects of a chosen standard. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 45:2002;421-433
46. Shrout P.E., Fleiss J.L. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psych Bull. 86:1979;420-428
47. Kreiman J., Gerratt B.R., Precoda K. Listener experience and perception of voice quality. J Speech Hear Res. 33:1990;103-115
48. Kreiman J., Gerratt B.R., Precoda K., Berke G. Individual differences in voice quality perception. J Speech Hear Res. 35:1992;512-520
49. De Bodt M.S., Wuyts F.L., Van de Heyning P.H., Croux C. Test-retest study of the GRBAS scale: influence of experience and professional background on perceptual rating of voice quality. J Voice. 11:1997;74-80
50. Morris R.J., Brown W.S. Jr. Comparison of various automatic means for measuring mean fundamental frequency. J Voice. 10:1996;159-165
51. Kent R.D. The clinical science of motor speech disorders: a personal assessment. Till F.A., Yorkston K., Beukelman D.R. Motor Speech Disorders: Advances in Assessment and Treatment. 1994;3-18 Paul Brooks, Baltimore