Comparison of various automatic means for measuring mean fundamental frequency

Journal of Voice

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 159-165

  Morris, Richard J ^a   Brown Jr , W S ^b  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Fundamental frequency; Speech analysis systems; System reliability

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COLLEGE STUDENT; FEMALE; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; SPEECH; SPEECH ANALYSIS; VOICE;

EID: 0029925428     PISSN: 08921997     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0892-1997(96)80043-9     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Brown W, Morris R, Weiss R. Comparative methods for measurement of VOT. J Phonet 1993;21:329-36.
2. Read C, Bruder E, Kent R. Speech analysis systems: a survey. J Speech Hear Res 1990;33:363-74.
3. Read C, Bruder E, Kent R. Speech analysis systems: an evaluation. J Speech Hear Res 1992;35:314-32.
4. Higgins M, Netsell R, Schulte L. Aerodynamic and electroglottographic measures of normal voice production: intrasubject variability within and across sessions. J Speech Hear Res 1994;37:38-46.
5. Fairbanks G. Voice and articulation drillbook. New York: Harper and Row, 1960.
6. Ebel R. Estimation of the reliability of ratings. Psychometrica 1951;16:407-24.
7. Siegal S. Non-parametric statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956.