The reliability of non-cognitive admissions measures in predicting non-traditional doctor of pharmacy student performance outcomes

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Volumn 67, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 129-143

  Stolte, Scott K ^a   Scheer, Stephanie B ^a   Robinson, Evan T ^a  

^a SHENANDOAH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic success; Admissions; Non traditional PharmD; Student performance

Indexed keywords

EID: 14844299048     PISSN: 00029459     EISSN: 15536467     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5688/aj670118     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Zgarrick DP, MacKinnon GE. Motivations and practice area preferences of pharmacists interested in pursuing a Pharm.D. degree through a non-traditional program. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 1998;55:1281-7.
2. Kulatunga-Moruzi C, Norman GR. Validity of admissions measures in predicting performance outcomes: the contributions of cognitive and non-cognitive dimensions. Teach Learn Med. 2002;14:34-42.
3. Driscoll M. Web-based training: Using technology to design adult learning experiences, San Francisco CA: Jossey-Bass, 1998:13-4.
4. Hayes E. Adult education: context and challenge for distance education. Am J Distance Educ. 1990;4:25-34.
5. rd ed., Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1997: 540.
6. rd ed. Boston, MA: McGraw Hill, 2000:464.
7. Sternberg RJ, Williams WM. Educational Psychology. Allyn & Bacon, Boston MA, 2002: 529.
8. Herman JL, Winters L. Portfolio research: A slim collection. Educational Leadership. 1994;52:48-55.
9. Ajzen I. Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Chicago IL: Dorsey Press, 1988.
10. Allen DD, Bond CA. Prepharmacy predictors of success in pharmacy school: grade point averages, pharmacy college admissions test, communication abilities, and critical thinking skills. Pharmacotherapy. 2001;21:842-9.