Science and political science redux

PS - Political Science and Politics

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 6-7

  Hill, Kim Quaile ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 14844285806     PISSN: 10490965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1049096505055666     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. Boston, David. 2002. "Political Science in the United States: Past and Present." In The Development of Political Science, eds. David Easton, John G. Gunnell, and Luigi Graziano. London: Routledge, 275-291.
2. Crick, Bernard. 1954. "The Science of Politics in the United States." Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 20 (August): 308-320.
3. Hill, Kim Quaile. 1997. "In Search of Policy Theory." Policy Currents 7 (April): 1-9.
4. _. 2002. "The Lamentable State of Science Education in Political Science." PS: Political Science & Politics 35 (March): 113-116.
5. Kirkpatrick, Evron M. 1962. "The Impact of the Behavioral Approach on Traditional Political Science." In Essays on the Behavioral Study of Politics, ed. Austin Ranney. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 29.
6. Kuhn, Thomas. 1996. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. Lakatos, Imre. 1978. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. London: Cambridge University Press.
8. Lynn, Naomi B. 1983. "Self Portrait: Profile of Political Scientists." In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, ed. Ada W. Finifter. Washington, D.C.: American Political Science Association, 95-126.
9. Nagel, Ernest. 1961. The Structure of Science. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
10. Schlagel, Richard H. 1995. From Myth to Modern Mind: A Study of the Origins and Growth of Scientific Thought. New York: Peter Lang.
11. Somit, Albert, and Joseph Tanenhaus. 1967. The Development of American Political Science. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
12. Watson, James D. 1968. The Double Helix. New York: Atheneum.