A feedback management procedure based on controlling the size of marine protected areas

Fisheries Science

Volumn 71, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 56-62

  Kai, Mikihiko ^a   Shirakihara, Kunio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Feedback control; Fisheries management; Marine protected area; Spatial distribution

Indexed keywords

EID: 14744289580     PISSN: 09199268     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1444-2906.2005.00930.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Jones PJS. Marine protected area strategies: issues, divergences and the search for middle ground. Rev. Fish. Biol. Fish. 2002; 11: 197-216.
2. Karagiannakos A. Total Allowable Catch (TAC) and quota management system in the European Union. Mar. Policy 1996; 20: 235-248.
3. Hastings A, Botsford LW. Equivalence in yield from marine reserves and traditional fisheries management. Science 1999; 284: 1537-1538.
4. Guenette S, Pitcher TJ. An age-structured model showing the benefits of marine reserves in controlling overexploitation. Fish. Res. 1999; 39: 295-303.
5. Apostolaki P, Milner-Gulland EJ, Mcallister MK, Kirkwood GP. Modeling the effects of establishing a marine reserve for mobile fish species. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2002; 59: 405-415.
6. Rodwell LD, Barbier EB, Roberts CM, McClanahan TR. The importance of habitat quality for marine reserve-fishery linkages. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2003; 60: 171-181.
7. Mangel M. Trade-offs between fish habitat and fishing mortality and the role of reserves. Bull. Mar. Sci. 2000; 66: 663-674.
8. Polacheck T. Year around closed areas as a management tool. Nat. Resource Model 1990; 4: 327-354.
9. Shirai Y, Harada Y. Evaluation of the advantage of marine protected areas over the reduction of the fishing mortality coefficient. Fish. Sci. 2003; 69: 465-472.
10. Man A. Role of marine reserves in recruitment to reef fisheries: a metapopulation model. Biol. Conserv. 1995; 71: 197-204.
11. Airame S, Dugan E, Lafferty KD, Leslie H, Mcardle DA, Warner RR. Applying ecological criteria to marine reserve design: a case study from the California Channel Islands. Ecol. Appl. 2003; 13 (Suppl.): 170-184.
12. Gaines SD, Gaylord B, Largier JL. Avoiding current oversights in marine reserve design. Ecol. Appl. 2003; 13 (Suppl.): 32-46.
13. Shanks AL, Grantham BA, Carr MH. Propagule dispersal distance and the size and spacing of marine reserves. Ecol. Appl. 2003; 13 (Suppl.): 159-169.
14. Botsford LB, Micheli F, Hastings A. Principles for the design of marine reserves. Ecol. Appl. 2003; 13 (Suppl.): 25-31.
15. Tanaka S. A theoretical consideration on the management of a stock-fishery system by catch quota and on its dynamical properties. Bull. Jap. Soc. Sci. Fish. 1980; 46: 1477-1482.
16. Shirakihara K, Tanaka S. Two fish species competition model with nonlinear interactions and equilibrium catches. Res. Popul. Ecol. 1978; 20: 123-140.
17. Bulmer M. Theoretical Evolutionary Ecology. Sinauer Associate Inc., Sunderland, MA. 1994.
18. Clark CW. Concentration profiles and the production and management of marine fisheries. In: Eichhorn W, Henn R, Neumann K, Shephard RW (eds). Economic Theory of Natural Resources. Physica, Würzburg, Wien. 1982; 97-112.
19. Imai T. Off the sea urchins off Miura city-i. The study of distribution, environment, growth and gonad in Jogashima. Bull. Kanagawa Pref. Fish. Exp. Stn. 1980; 1: 35-49.
20. Hart DR. Yield-and biomass-per-recruit analysis for rotational fisheries, with an application to the Atlantic sea scallop (Placopecten magellanicus). Fish. Bull. 2003; 101: 44-57.