5 NICE years

Lancet

Volumn 365, Issue 9462, 2005, Pages 904-908

  Rawlins, Michael D ^a  

^a Natl Inst for Clinical Excellence   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DRUG INDUSTRY; ECONOMIC ASPECT; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

EID: 14744283055     PISSN: 01406736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71050-3     Document Type: Note

References (30)

1. MD Rawlins In pursuit of quality: the National Institute for Clinical Excellence Lancet 353 1999 1079 1082
2. National Institute for Clinical Excellence A guide to NICE 2003 National Institute for Clinical Excellence London
3. Report of the public inquiry into children's heart surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984-95. Learning from Bristol. 2001; command 52078.
4. Select Committee on Health National Institute for Clinical Excellence, second report of session 2001-02. HC 515-1 2002 Stationery Office London www.publications.parliament.uk (accessed Oct 10, 2004)
5. Select Committee on Health National Institute for Clinical Excellence, second report of session 2001-02. HC 515-1 Minutes of evidence 2002 Stationary Office London www.publications.parliament.uk (accessed Oct 10, 2004)
6. S Hill, S Garattini, B O'Brien, J van Leonhout, K de Joncheere Technology appraisal programme of the National Institute for Clinical Excellence: a review by WHO 2003 World Health Organization Copenhagen
7. N Devlin, D Parkin, M Gold WHO evaluates NICE? BMJ 327 2003 1061 1062
8. A Gafni, S Birch NICE methodological guidelines and decision making in the National Health Service in England and Wales Pharmacoeconomics 21 2003 149 157
9. Rawlins MD, Culyer AJ. National Institute for Clinical Excellence and its value judgements. BMJ; 329: 224-27.
10. N Devlin, J Appleby, D Parkin Patients' views of explicit rationing: what are the implications for health service decision-makers? J Health Serv Res Policy 8 2003 183 186
11. Z Kmietowicz NICE appraisal procedures attacked BMJ 321 2000 980
12. RW Motson Why does NICE not recommend laparoscopic herniorraphy? BMJ 324 2002 1092 1094
13. A Oliver Unintended consequences of applying economic evaluation J Health Serv Res Policy 7 2002 129 130
14. R Cookson, D McDaid, A Maynard Wrong SIGN, NICE mess: is national guidance distorting allocation of resources? BMJ 323 2001 743 745
15. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Anakinra in rheumatoid arthritis. Technology appraisal guidance 2003; number 59.
16. PA Poole-Wilson NICE: guessing is not guidance Heart 87 2002 510 512
17. O Dyer Oncologists protest about NICE's decision on cancer drugs BMJ 324 2002 1413
18. M Rawlins EuroNICE: the case against Scrip 2701 2001 6 7
19. P Quennell Getting their say, or getting their way? Has participation strengthened the patient "voice" in the National Institute for Clinical Excellence? J Manag Med 15 2001 202 219
20. Z Kmietowicz Government insists NHS pays for drugs approved by NICE BMJ 323 2001 1386
21. Anon Money must be made available for NICE guidance, minister says BMJ 327 2003 1368
22. NS Sung, WF Crowley, M Genel Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise JAMA 289 2003 1278 1287
23. Department of Health A first class service: quality in the new NHS 1998 Department of Health London
24. K Westcott, GH Irvine Appropriateness of referrals for removal of wisdom teeth Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 40 2002 304 306
25. JR Parr, A Ward, S Inman Current practice in the management of attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity (ADHD) Child Care Health Dev 29 2003 215 218
26. BM Wroblewski, PD Siney, PA Fleming Wear of enhanced ultra-high molecular-weight polyethylene (Hylamer) in combination with a 22.225 mm diameter zircon femoral head Br J Bone Joint Surg 85 2003 376 379
27. National Audit Office Hip replacements: an update 2003 Stationery Office London
28. Alzheimer's Society Ask about medicines week: poor drug access condemned. Press release; Oct 16, 2003 www.alzheimers.org.uk (accessed Oct 10, 2004)
29. A Jones Health technology assessment agencies across Europe Focus 14 2003 5 11
30. G Antes, I Chalmers Under-reporting of clinical trials is unethical Lancet 361 2003 978 979