Developmental changes in the response to obstacles during prehension

Journal of Motor Behavior

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 103-110

  Tresilian, J R ^a   Mon Williams, Mark ^a,b   Coppard, V L ^a   Carson, R G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Movement; Obstacle avoidance; Planning; Prehension; Preparation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HAND GRIP; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KINEMATICS; KINESIOLOGY; MALE; MOTOR COORDINATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PLANNING; TASK PERFORMANCE; VELOCITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; CHILD; ESCAPE REACTION; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MOTOR SKILLS; MOVEMENT; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 14644437143     PISSN: 00222895     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bard, C., & Hay, L. (1983). Ontogenetic study of visual-manual coordination. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 37, 390-413.
2. Brown, J. V., Sepehr, M., Etlinger, G., & Skreczek, W. (1986). The accuracy of aimed movements to visual targets during development - The role of visual information. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41, 443-460.
3. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Dean, J., & Brüwer, M. (1994). Control of human arm movements in two dimensions: Path and joint control in avoiding simple obstacles. Experimental Brain Research, 97, 497-514.
5. Elliott, D., Helsen, W. F., & Chua, R. (2001). A century later: Woodworth's (1899) two-component model of goal-directed aiming. Psychological Bulletin. 127, 342-357.
6. Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381-391.
7. Haggard. P., & Wing, A. M. (1995). Coordinated responses following mechanical perturbation of the arm during prehension. Experimental Brain Research, 102, 483-494.
8. Hay, L., & Redon, C. (1997). The control of goal-directed movements in children: Role of proprioceptive muscle afferents. Human Movement Science, 16, 433-451.
9. Henderson, S. E., & Sugden, D. A. (1992). Movement assessment battery for children. New York: The Psychological Corporation, Brace and Jovanovich.
10. Hohlstein, R. R. (1982). The development of prehension in normal infants. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 36, 170-176.
11. Howard, L. A., & Tipper, S. P. (1997). Hand deviations away from visual cues: Indirect evidence for inhibition. Experimental Brain Research, 113, 144-152.
12. Jackson S. R., Jackson, G. M., & Rosicky, J. (1995). Are non-relevant objects represented in working memory? The effect of non-target objects on reach and grasp kinematics. Experimental Brain Research, 102, 519-530.
13. Jeannerod, M. (1988). The neural and behavioural organization of goal-directed movements. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
14. Kuhtz-Buschbeck, J. P., Stolze, H., Boczek-Funcke, A., Jöhnk, K., Heinrichs, H., & Illert, M. (1998). Kinematic analysis of prehension movements in children. Behavioral Brain Research, 93, 131-141.
15. Kuhtz-Buschbeck, J. P., Stolze, H., Jöhnk, K., Boczek-Funcke, A., & Illert, M. (1999). Development of prehension movements in children: A kinematic study. Experimental Brain Research, 122, 424-432.
16. McCarty, M. E., & Ashmead, D. H. (1999). Visual control of reaching and grasping in infants. Developmental Psychology, 35, 620-631.
17. Meyer, D. E., Kornblum, S., Abrams, R. A., Wright, C. E., & Smith, J. E. K. (1988). Optimality in human motor performance-Ideal control of rapid aimed movement. Psychological Review, 95, 340-370.
18. Mon-Williams, M., & McIntosh, R. D. (2000). A test between two hypotheses and a possible third way for the control of prehension. Experimental Brain Research, 134, 268-273.
19. Paulignan, Y., MacKenzie, C., Marteniuk, R., & Jeannerod, M. (1991). Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements. 1. The effects of changing object position. Experimental Brain Research, 83, 502-512.
20. Plamondon, R., & Alimi, A. (1997). Speed/accuracy trade-offs in target-directed movements. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 20, 279-296.
21. Pryde, K. M., Roy, E. A., & Campbell, K. (1998). Prehension in children and adults: The effects of object size. Human Movement Science, 17, 743-752.
22. Rösblad, B. (1997). Roles of visual information for control of reaching movements in children. Journal of Motor Behavior, 29, 174-182.
23. Sabes, P. N., & Jordan, M. I. (1997). Obstacle avoidance and a perturbation sensitivity model for motor planning. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 7119-7128.
24. Saling, M., Alberts, J., Stelmach, G. E., & Bloedel, J. R. (1988). Reach-to-grasp movements during obstacle avoidance. Experimental Brain Research, 118, 251-258.
25. Tipper, S. P., Howard, L. A., & Jackson, S. R. (1997). Selective reaching to grasp: Evidence for distractor interference effects. Visual Cognition, 4, 1-38.
26. Tresilian, J. R. (1998). Attention in action or obstruction in movement? A kinematic analysis of avoidance behavior in prehension. Experimental Brain Research, 120, 352-368.