How trade politics affect invasive species control

Ecological Economics

Volumn 52, Issue 3 SPEC. ISS., 2005, Pages 305-313

  Margolis, Michael ^a   Shogren, Jason F ^b   Fischer, Carolyn ^c  

^a Rice Hall ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING   (United States)

^c RESOURCES FOR THE FUTURE   (United States)

Author keywords

Disguised protectionism; Invasive species; Trade

Indexed keywords

INTERNATIONAL TRADE; INVASIVE SPECIES; PROTECTIONISM; TARIFF STRUCTURE; TRADE RELATIONS; TRADE-ENVIRONMENT RELATIONS;

EID: 14644427792     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.07.017     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. T.S. Aidt Political Internalization of Economic Externalities and Environmental Policy Journal of Public Economics 69 1 1998 1 16
2. B.D. Bernheim, and M.D. Whinston Menu auctions, resource allocation, and economic influence Quarterly Journal of Economics 101 1 1986 1 31
3. Commission for Environmental Cooperation of North America Preventing the introduction and spread of aquatic invasive species in North America J. Reaser Workshop Proceedings, 28-30 March, 2001, Montréal, Canada 2001
4. B.R. Copeland, and M.S. Taylor Trade and the Environment: Theory and Evidence 2003 Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ
5. K. Gawande US non-tariff barriers as privately provided public goods Journal of Public Economics 64 1 1997 61 81
6. P.K. Goldberg, and G. Maggi Protection for sale: an empirical investigation American Economic Review 89 5 1999 1135 1155
7. G.M. Grossman, and E. Helpman Protection for sale American Economic Review 84 4 1994 833 850
8. Gary C. Hufbauer, Daniel C. Esty, Diana Orejas, Luis Rubio, and Jeffrey J. Schott NAFTA and the Environment: Seven Years Later 2000 Institute for International Economics Washington, D.C.
9. P. Jenkins Free trade and exotic species introductions Conservation Biology 10 1 1996 300 302
10. Margolis, M., Shogren, J., 2004. Aliens for Sale, Working paper, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC (in press).
11. C. McAusland, and C. Costello Avoiding invasives: trade-related policies for controlling unintentional exotic species introduction Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 48 2004 954 977
12. D. Mitra, and D.D. Thomakos "Protection for Sale" in a Developing Country: Democracy vs. Dictatorship Review of Economics and Statistics 84 3 2002 497 508
13. Office of Technology Assessment Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States 1993 US Government Printing Office Washington, DC
14. J. Pauwelyn Evidence, Proof and Persuasion in WTO Dispute Settlement: Who Bears the Burden? Journal of International Economic Law 1 2 1998 227 258
15. J. Pauwelyn The WTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Measures as Applied in the First Three SPS Disputes: EC-Hormones, Australia-Salmon and Japan-Varietals Journal of International Economic Law 2 4 1999 641 664
16. D. Pimentel, L. Lach, R. Zuniga, and D. Morrison Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States BioScience 50 2000 53 65
17. D. Pimentel, R. Zuniga, and D. Morrison Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien species in the United States Ecological Economics 52 2005 273 288
18. D. Roberts Sanitary and phytosanitary risk management in the post-Uruguay round era: an economic perspective Incorporating Science, Economics, and Sociology in Developing Sanitary and Phytosanitary Standards in International Trade: Proceedings of a Conference 2000 National Academy of Sciences Washington, DC 33 50
19. O.T. Sandlund P.J. Schei A. Viken Invasive Species and Biodiversity Management 1999 Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht, the Netherlands
20. World Trade Organization Understanding the WTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures 1998 Geneva Switzerland
21. World Trade Organization 2002. GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement Practice Relating to GATT Article XX, Paragraphs (b), (d) and (g), World Trade Organization: 48, Geneva, Switzerland.