Re‐engineering conventional university education: Implications for students’ learning styles

Distance Education

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 361-384

  Schellens, Tammy ^a   Valcke, Martin ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 14644422424     PISSN: 01587919     EISSN: 14750198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0158791000210210     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Billings, D.M., and Cobb, K.L., 1992. ‘Effects of learning style preferences, attitude and GPA on learner achievement using computer‐assisted interactive videodisc instruction’. Journal of Computer‐Based Instruction, 19 (1): 12–16.
2. Collis, B., 1998. ‘New didactics for university: Why and how?’. Computers & Education,: 373–93.
3. Collis, B., and Van der Wende, M., 1999. The Use of Information and Communication Technologies in Higher Education ‐ An International Orientation on Trends and Issues, Utwente/CHEPS, Twente.
4. Curry, L., 1987. Integrating Concepts of Cognitive or Learning Style: A Review with Attention to Psychometric Standards, Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian College of Health Services Executives.
5. Felder, R., 1993. ‘Reaching the second tier: Learning and teaching styles in college science education”. Journal for College Science Teaching, 23 (5): 286–90.
6. Felder, R. 1996. ‘Matters of style’. ASEE Prism, 6 (4): 18–23.
7. Felder, R., and Silverman, L., 1988. ‘Learning and teaching styles in engineering education’. Engineering Education, 78 (7): 674–81.
8. Garner, I., ‘The development of total learning resources and their relationship with academic course grades. Proceedings of the 5th annual conference of the European Learning Styles Information Network. pp. 75–83. Hertford: University of Hertfordshire/ELSIN.
9. Kolb, D., 1984. Experiential Learning ‐ Experience as a Source of Learning Development, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10. Shaw, G., and Marlow, N., 1999. ‘The role of student learning styles, gender, attitudes and perceptions on information and communication technology assisted learning. Computers and Education,: 223–34.
11. Schroeder, C., 1999. New students‐New learning styles. Electronic publication of the ‘Virtual School’ .
12. Valcke, M., 1999. “ ‘Educational re‐design of courses to support large groups of university students by building upon the potential of ICT’ ”. In Information Technology for Teaching and Training, Edited by: D'Hollander, E., Kerre, E., Vanwormhoudt, M., Vervenne, D., and Vandamme, F., Ghent: Communication & Cognition, Ghent University.
13. Veen, W., van Tartwijk, J., Lam, I., Pilot, A., van Geloven, M, Moonen, J., and Peters, E., 1999. Flexibel en open hoger onderwijs met ICT, een inventarisatie van ICT‐gebruik, meningen en verwachtingen [Flexible and open higher education with ICT ‐ An inventory of ICT‐use, opinions and expectations], Utrecht/Enschede: IVLOS/Universiteite Twente, OC & Fac. TO.
14. Vermunt, J., 1992. Zelfstandig leren. Regulatie van het leerproces en leren reguleren: een procesbenadering, Tilburg: KUB. unpublished PhD‐Dissertation