Three-year prospective adherence to three breast cancer screening modalities

Preventive Medicine

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 781-786

  Solomon, Laura J ^a   Mickey, Ruth M ^a   Rairikar, C J ^b   Worden, John K ^a   Flynn, Brian S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms; Breast self examination; Mammography; Mass screening

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF EXAMINATION;

EID: 0032420779     PISSN: 00917435     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/pmed.1998.0357     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. American Cancer Society, Cancer facts and figures, New York, Am. Cancer Soc. 1996.
2. Foster R S, Worden J K, Costanza M C, Solomon L J. Clinical breast examination and breast self-examination. Cancer. 69:1992;1992-1998.
3. Gastrin G, Miller A B, To T. Incidence and mortality from breast cancer in the Mama Program for Breast Screening in Finland, 1973-1986. Cancer. 73:1994;2168-2174.
4. O' Malley M S, Fletcher S W. Screening for breast cancer with breast self-examination: a critical review. JAMA. 257:1987;2197-2203.
5. Newcomb P A, Weiss N S, Storer B E. Breast self-examination in relation to the occurrence of advanced breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 83:1991;260-265.
6. Thomas D B, Gao D L, Self S G. Randomized trial of breast self-examination in Shanghai: methodology and preliminary results. J Natl Cancer Inst. 89:1997;355-365.
7. Rimer B K. Mammography use in the U.S.: trends and the impact of interventions. Ann Behav Med. 16:1994;317-326.
8. Zapka J G, Hosmer D, Costanza M E, Harris D R, Stoddard A. Changes in mammography use: economic, need, and service factors. Am J Public Health. 82:1992;1345-1351.
9. Bastani R, Maxwell A E, Bradford C. Cross-sectional versus prospective predictors of screening mammography. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 5:1996;845-848.
10. Lee JR J, Vogel V G. Who uses screening mammography regularly? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 4:1995;901-906.
11. Lerman C, Rimer B, Trock B, Balshiem A, Engstrom P F. Factors associated with repeat adherence to breast cancer screening. Prev Med. 19:1990;279-290.
12. Rimer B K, Lerman C, Trock B, King E, Engstrom P F. Why do some women get regular mammograms? Am J Prev Med. 7:1991;69-74.
13. Zapka J G, Stoddard A, Maul L, Costanza M E. Interval adherence to mammography screening guidelines. Med Care. 29:1991;697-707.
14. Fink R, Shapiro S, Roester R. Impact of efforts to increase participation in repetitive screenings for early breast cancer detection. Am J Public Health. 3:1972;328-337.
15. Roberts M M, Alexander F E, Anderson T J. Edinburgh trial of screening for breast cancer: mortality at seven years. Lancet. 335:1990;241-246.
16. Tabar L, Fagerberg G, Duffy S W, Day N E. The Swedish two-county trial of mammographic screening for breast cancer recent results and calculation of benefit. Epidemiol Community Health. 43:1989;107-114.
17. Collette JH A, Day N E, Rombach J J, deWaard F. Evaluation of screening for breast cancer in a non-randomized study (The Dom Project) by means of a case-control study. Lancet. 1:1984;1224-1226.
18. Scaf-Klomp W, Van Sonderen FL P, Stewart R, Van Dijck JAA M, Van den Heuvel WJ A. Compliance after 17 years of breast cancer screening. J Med Screening. 2:1995;195-199.
19. Baines C J, To T. Changes in breast self-examination behavior achieved by 89,835 participants in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. Cancer. 66:1990;570-576.
20. Miller A B, Baines C J, To T, Wall C. Canadian National Breast Screening Study. 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years. Can Med Assoc J. 147:1992;1477-1488.
21. Solomon L J, Flynn B S, Worden J K. Assessment of self-reward strategies for maintenance of breast self-examination. J Behav Med. 21:1998;83-102.
22. SAS Institute, Inc. SAS/STAT guide for personal computers, version 6, Cary, NC, SAS Inst. 1987.
23. Gabriel K S. Simultaneous test procedures for multiple comparisons on categorical data. J Am Stat Assoc. 61:1966;1081-1096.
24. Shah B V, Barnwell B G, Bieler G S. SUDAAN user's manual, release 7.0. 1996;Research Triangle Inst. Research Triangle Park.
25. Fox S A, Murata P J, Stein J A. The impact of physician compliance on screening mammography for older women. Arch Intern Med. 151:1991;50-56.
26. Howe H L. Repeat mammography among women over 50 years of age. Am J Prev Med. 8:1992;182-185.
27. Mickey R M, Durski J, Worden J K, Danigelis N L. Breast cancer screening and associated factors for low-income African-American women. Prev Med. 24:1995;467-476.
28. King E S, Rimer B K, Trock B, Balshem A, Engstrom P. How valid are mammography self-reports? Am J Public Health. 80:1990;1386-1388.
29. Etzi S, Lane D S, Grimson R. The use of mammography vans by low-income women: the accuracy of self-reports. Am J Public Health. 84:1994;107-109.
30. Zapka J G, Bigelow C, Hurley T. Mammography use among sociodemographically diverse women: the accuracy of self-report. Am J Public Health. 86:1996;1016-1021.