Supporting learning with interactive multimedia through active integration of representations

Instructional Science

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 73-95

  Bodemer, Daniel ^a   Ploetzner, Rolf ^b   Bruchmüller, Katrin ^c   Häcker, Sonja ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION FREIBURG   (Germany)

^c KNOWLEDGE MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cognitive load; Coherence formation; Discovery learning; Dynamic visualisations; Interactive learning environments; Multiple representations; Simulations; Structure mapping

Indexed keywords

EID: 14644408087     PISSN: 00204277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11251-004-7685-z     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ainsworth, S. (1999) The functions of multiple representations. Computers and Education 33: 131-152.
2. Ainsworth, S., Bibby, P.A. & Wood, D.J. (2002) Examining the effects of different multiple representational systems in learning primary mathematics. Journal of the Learning Sciences 11: 25-62.
3. Ainsworth, S. & van Labeke, N. (2004) Multiple forms of dynamic representation. Learning and Instruction 14: 241-255.
4. Blaschke, K. & Heuer, D. (2000) Dynamik-Lernen mit multimedial-experimentell unterstütztem Werkstatt-Unterricht [Learning dynamics in multimedia projects]. Physik in der Schule 38: 1-6.
5. Bodemer, D., Ploetzner, R., Feuerlein, I. & Spada, H. (2004) The active integration of information during learning with dynamic and interactive visualizations. Learning and Instruction 14: 325-341.
6. Brünken, R., Steinbacher, S., Schnotz, W. & Leutner, D. (2001) Mentale Modelle und Effekte der Präsentations- und Abrufkodalität beim Lernen mit Multimedia [Mental models and the effects of presentation and retrieval mode in multimedia learning]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie 15: 15-27.
7. Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (1991) Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction 8: 293-332.
8. Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (1992) The split-attention effect as a factor in the design of instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology 62: 233-246.
9. de Jong, T. & van Joolingen, W.R. (1998) Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research 68: 179-201.
10. Gentner, D. (1983) Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science 7: 155-170.
11. Gentner, D. & Markman, A.B. (1997) Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist 52: 45-56.
12. Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (1999) Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology 13: 351-371.
13. Klahr, D. & Dunbar, K. (1988) Dual space search during scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science 12: 1-48.
14. Kozma, R. (2003) The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding. Learning and Instruction 13: 205-226.
15. Kozma, R.B., Russell, J., Jones, T., Marx, N. & Davis, J. (1996) The use of multiple, linked representations to facilitate science understanding. In S. Vosniadou, E. De Corte, R. Glaser and H. Mandl, eds, International Perspectives on the Design of Technology Supported Learning Environments, pp. 41-61. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Larkin, J.H. & Simon, H.A. (1987) Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousands words. Cognitive Science 11: 65-99.
17. Leutner, D. (1993) Guided discovery learning with computer-based simulation games: effects of adaptive and non-adaptive instructional support. Learning and Instruction 3: 113-132.
18. Lowe, R.K. (1999) Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education 14: 225-244.
19. Lowe, R.K. (2003) Animation and learning: Selective processing of information in dynamic graphics. Learning and Instruction 13: 157-176.
20. Mayer, R.E. (1997) Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist 32: 1-19.
21. Mayer, R.E. (2001) Multimedia Learning. NY: Cambridge University Press.
22. Njoo, M. & de Jong, T. (1993) Supporting exploratory learning by offering structured overviews of hypotheses. In D.M. Towne, T. de Jong, and H. Spada, eds, Simulation-based Experiential Learning, pp. 207-223. Berlin: Springer Publishers.
23. Ploetzner, R., Bodemer, D. & Feuerlein, I. (2001) Facilitating the mental integration of multiple sources of information in multimedia learning environments. In C. Montgomerie and J. Viteli, eds, Proceedings of the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, pp. 1501-1506. Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
24. Ploetzner, R., Bodemer, D. & Neudert, S. (in press) Successful and unsuccessful use of dynamic visualisations in instructional texts. In R. K. Lowe & W. Schnotz, eds, Learning with Animations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. Reigeluth, C.M. & Schwartz, E. (1989) An instructional theory for the design of computer-based simulations. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 16: 1-10.
26. Reimann, P. (1991). Detecting functional relations in a computerized discovery environment. Learning and Instruction 1: 45-65.
27. Rieber, L.P., Tzeng, S.-C. & Tribble, K. (2004) Discovery learning, representation, and explanation within a computer-based simulation: Finding the right mix. Learning and Instruction 14: 307-323.
28. Schauble, L., Glaser, R., Raghavan, K. & Reiner, M. (1991) Causal models and experimentation strategies in scientific reasoning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 1: 201-239.
29. Schnotz, W. & Bannert, M. (1999) Einflüsse der Visualisierungsform auf die Konstruktion mentaler Modelle beim Text- und Bildverstehen [Influence of the type of visualization on the construction of mental models during picture and text comprehension]. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie 46: 217-236.
30. Schnotz, W. & Bannert, M. (2003) Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation. Learning and Instruction, 13: 141-156.
31. Schnotz, W., Boeckheler, J. & Grzondziel, H. (1999) Individual and co-operative learning with interactive animated pictures. European Journal of Psychology of Education 14: 245-265.
32. Seufert, T. (2003) Supporting coherence formation in learning from multiple representations. Learning and Instruction 13: 227-237.
33. Swaak, J., van Joolingen, W.R. & de Jong, T. (1998) Supporting simulation-based learning: The effects of model progression and assignments on definitional and intuitive knowledge. Learning and Instruction 8: 235-252.
34. Sweller, J. (1988) Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science 12: 257-285.
35. Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J.J.G. & Paas, F.G.W.C. (1998) Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review 10: 251-296.
36. Tarmizi, R.A. & Sweller, J. (1988) Guidance during mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology 80: 424-436.
37. Van Joolingen, W.R. & de Jong, T. (1991) Supporting hypothesis generation by learners exploring an interactive computer simulation. Instructional Science 20: 389-404.
38. Van Joolingen, W.R. & de Jong, T. (1997) An extended dual search space model of scientific discovery learning. Instructional Science 25: 307-346.