Application of artificial neural networks to complex groundwater management problems

Natural Resources Research

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 303-320

  Coppola Jr , Emery ^a   Poulton, Mary ^b   Charles, Emmanuel ^c   Dustman, John ^d   Szidarovszky, Ferenc ^b  

^a NOAH LLC   (United States)

^b University of Arizona   (United States)

^c Geological Survey   (United States)

^d Summit EnviroSolutions   (United States)

Author keywords

Groundwater; Groundwater management; Groundwater optimization; Numerical models

Indexed keywords

EID: 14644401332     PISSN: 15207439     EISSN: 15738981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:NARR.0000007808.11860.7e     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ahlfeld, D. P., and Riefler, R. G., 1999, Documentation for MODOFC: A program for solving optimal flow control problems based on MODFLOW simulation version 2.11: downloaded from web, p. 14.
2. American Society of Civil Engineers Task Committee on Application of Artifical Neural Networks in Hydrology, 2000a, Artifical neural networks in hydrology. I: Preliminary concepts: Jour. Hydrologic Engineering, v. 5, no. 2, p. 115-123.
3. American Society of Civil Engineers Task Committee on Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology, 2000b, Artifical neural networks in hydrology. II: Hydrologic applications: Jour. Hydrologic Engineering, v. 5, no. 2, p. 124-137.
4. Anderson, M., and Woessner, W., 1992, Applied groundwater modeling: Academic Press Inc., San Diego, California, 381 p.
5. Carrera, J., and Neuman, S. P., 1986a, Estimation of aquifer parameters under transient and steady state conditions: 1. Maximum likelihood method incorporating prior information: Water Resources Research Jour., v. 22, no. 2, p. 199-210.
6. Carrera, J., and Neuman, S. P., 1986b, Estimation of aquifer parameters under transient and steady state conditions: 2. Uniqueness, stability and solution algorithms: Water Resources Research Jour., v. 22, no. 2, p. 211-217.
7. Carrera, J., and Neuman, S. P., 1986c, Estimation of aquifer parameters under transient and steady state conditions: 3. Application of synthetic and field data: Water Resources Research Jour., v. 22, no. 2, p. 228-242.
8. Charles, E. G., Behroozi, J., Schooley, J., and Hoffman, J. L., 1993, A method for evaluating groundwater recharge areas in New Jersey: New Jersey Geol. Survey Rept. GSR 32, 95 p.
9. Cohrssen, J. J., and Covello, T., 1989, Risk analysis; a guide to principle and methods for analyzing health and environmental risks: White House Council on Environmental Quality, National Technical Information Service, Washington D.C., 407 p.
10. Coppola, E., 2000, Optimal pumping policy for a public supply wellfield using computational neural network with decisionmaking methodology: unpubl. doctoral disseration, Univ. Arizona, 226 p.
11. Coppola, E., Szidarovszky F., Poulton, M., and Charles, E., An artifical neural network approach for predicting transient water levels in a multilayered groundwater system under variable state, pumping, and climate conditions: Jour. Hydrologic Engineering, in press.
12. Coulibaly, P., Anctil, F., Aravena, R., and Bobee, B., 2001, Artifical neural network modeling of water table depth fluctuations: Water Resources Research Jour., v. 7, no. 4, p. 885-896.
13. Fischhoff, B.,Watson, S. R., and Hope, C., 1984, Defining risk: Jour. Policy Sciences, v. 17, p. 123-139.
14. Freeze, A., E, and Cherry, J., 1979, Groundwater: Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, p. 30.
15. Gelhar, L., 1993, Stochastic subsurface hydrology: Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 390 p.
16. Harbaugh, A.W., Banta, E. R., Hill, M. C., and McDonald, M. G., 2000,"MODFLOW2000, theU.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model-user guide to modularization concepts and the ground-water flow process:" U.S. Geol. Survey Open- File Rept. 00-92, 121 p.
17. Hecht-Nielsen, R., 1987, Counterpropagation networks: Proc. Itern. Conf. Neural Networks, IEEE Press, New York v. II, p. 19-31.
18. Konikow, L. F., and Bredehoeft, J. D., 1992, Ground-water models cannot be validated: Advances inWater Resources, v. 15, p. 75-83.
19. LINDO Systems Inc., 1999. LINGO 5.0 Users Manual: Chicago, Illinois, 535 p.
20. Mossler, J. H., 1972, A Paleozoic structure and stratigraphy of the Twin City Region, in Sims, P. K., and Morey,G.B., eds, Geology of Minnesota: a Centennial Volume, Minnesota Geol. Survey, p. 485-497.
21. New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services in cooperation with Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2003, Case-control study of childhood cancers in Dover Township (Ocean County), New Jersey. Volume I: Summary Final Tech. Rept. www.state.nj.us/health/eoh/hhazweb/casecontrol pdf/VolumeI/vol i.pdf
22. Oreskes,N., Shrader-Frechette, K., and Belitz, K, 1994,Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences: Science, v. 263, no. 5147, p. 641-646.
23. Ryder, P. D., 1985, Hydrology of the Floridan Aquifer System in west-central Florida: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 1403-F, 63 p.
24. Sprecher, D., 1965, On the structure of continuous functions of several variables Am. Math. Soc. Trans., no. 115, p. 340-355.
25. Swingler, K., 1996, Applying neural networks: Academic Press Inc., San Diego, California, 303 p.
26. Sun, N.-Z., Jeng, M.-C., and Yeh, W. W.-G. 1995, A proposed geological parameter identification in three-dimensional groundwater modeling:Water Resources Research Jour., v. 31, no. 1, p. 89-102.
27. Szidarovszky, F., and Bahill, A. T., 1998, Linear systems theory: CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 485 p.
28. Zapecza, O. S., 1989, Hydrogeologic framework of the New Jersey Coastal Plain: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 1404-B, 49 p., 24 pl.