The conversational basis for the dilution effect

Journal of Language and Social Psychology

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 25-35

  Igou, Eric R ^a   Bless, Herbert ^b  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bias; Diagnosticity; Dilution effect; Logic of conversation; Predictions

Indexed keywords

EID: 14544308342     PISSN: 0261927X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0261927X04273035     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ajzen, I. (1977). Intuitive theories of events and the effects of base rate information on prediction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 303-314.
2. Bless, H., Strack, F., & Schwarz, N. (1993). The informative function of research procedures: Bias and the logic of conversation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 149-165.
3. Borgida, E., & Nisbett, R. (1977). The differential impact of abstract vs. concrete information on decisions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 7, 258-271.
4. Ginossar, Z., & Trope, Y. (1980). The effects of base rates and individuating information on judgments about another person. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 228-242.
5. Grice, P. (1975). Logic of conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
6. Higgins, E. T. (1981). The 'communication game': Implications for social cognition and persuasion. In E. T. Higgins, M. Zanna, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 1, pp. 343-392). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Igou, E. R., & Bless, H. (2003). Inferring the importance of arguments: Order effects and conversational rules. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 91-99.
8. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430-454.
9. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, 237-251.
10. Krosnick, J., Li, P., & Lehman, D. R. (1990). Conversational conventions, order of information acquisition, and the effect of base rates and the individuating information on social judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1140-1152.
11. Kruglanski, A. W., Webster, D. M., & Klem, A. (1993). Motivated resistance and openness to persuasion in the presence or absence of prior information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 861-876.
12. Nisbett, R. E., Zukier, H., & Lemley, R. E. (1981). The dilution effect: Nondiagnostic information weakens the impact of diagnostic information, Cognitive Psychology, 13, 248-277.
13. Peters, E., & Rothbart, M. (2000). Typicality can create, eliminate, and reverse the dilution effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 177-187.
14. Schwarz, N. (1994). Judgments in a social context: Biases, shortcomings, and the logic of conversation. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 26, pp. 123-162). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
15. Schwarz, N. (1996). Cognition and communication: Judgmental biases, research methods, and the logic of conversation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Schwarz, N., Strack, F., Hilton, D., & Naderer, G. (1991). Judgmental biases and the logic of conversation: The contextual relevance of irrelevant information. Social Cognition, 9, 67-84.
17. Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Strack, F. (1994). Response processes in social judgment. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 287-321). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Tetlock, P. E. (1983). Accountability and complexity of thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 74-83.
20. Tetlock, P. E., & Boettger, R. (1989). Accountability: A social magnifier of the dilution effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 388-398.
21. Tetlock, P. E., Lerner, J. S., & Boettger, R. (1996). The dilution effect: Judgmental bias, conversational convention, or a bit of both? European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 915-934.
22. Wright, E. F., & Wells, G. L. (1988). Is the attitude attribution paradigm suitable for investigating the dispositional bias? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 183-190.
23. Zukier, H. (1982). The dilution effect: The role of the correlation and the dispersion of predictor variables in the use of nondiagnostic information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 1163-1174.
24. Zukier, H., & Jennings, D. (1983-1984). Nondiagnosticity and typicality effects in prediction. Social Cognition, 2, 187-198.