Magnetism, Charge Order, and Giant Magnetoresistance in SrFeO 3-δ Single Crystals

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 92, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 372021-372024

  Lebon, A ^a   Adler, P ^b   Bernhard, C ^a   Boris, A V ^a   Pimenov, A V ^a   Maljuk, A ^a   Lin, C T ^a   Ulrich, C ^a   Keimer, B ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR FESTKÖRPERFORSCHUNG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KARLSRUHE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANNEALING; CRYSTAL GROWTH; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; GIANT MAGNETORESISTANCE; GRAIN BOUNDARIES; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; MAGNETIZATION; MOSSBAUER SPECTROSCOPY; PARAMAGNETISM; PHASE DIAGRAMS; PHASE TRANSITIONS; SINGLE CRYSTALS; SYNTHESIS (CHEMICAL); THERMOGRAVIMETRIC ANALYSIS; X RAY POWDER DIFFRACTION;

CHARGE ORDERING; MAGNETOTRANSPORT PROPERTIES; WAVE NUMBERS;

STRONTIUM COMPOUNDS;

EID: 1442355651     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. R. von Helmolt et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 2331 (1993).
2. M. Uehara et al., Nature (London) 399, 560 (1999).
3. A. E. Bocquet et al. Phys. Rev. B 45, 1561 (1992).
4. P. K. Gallagher, D. N. Buchanan, and J. B. MacChesney, J. Chem. Phys. 41, 2429 (1964).
5. J. B. MacChesney, R. C. Sherwood, and J. F. Potter, J. Chem. Phys. 43, 1907 (1965).
6. T. Takeda and H. Watanabe, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 33, 967 (1972).
7. H. Oda et al., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 42, 101 (1977).
8. E. O. Wollan and W. C. Koehler, Phys. Rev. 100, 148 (1955).
9. J. Matsuno et al., Phys. Rev. B 60, 4605 (1999).
10. J. Q. Li et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 297 (1997).
11. S. K. Park et al., Phys. Rev. B 60, 10788 (1999).
12. T. Ishikawa et al., Phys. Rev. B 58, R13326 (1998).
13. Y. M. Zhao et al., Phys. Rev. B 64, 024414 (2001).
14. P. D. Battle et al., Chem. Commun. 987 (1998); S. Ghosh and P. Adler, Solid State Commun. 116, 585 (2000); P. Adler and S. Ghosh, Solid State Sci. 5, 445 (2003).
15. P. D. Battle et al., Chem. Commun. 987 (1998); S. Ghosh and P. Adler, Solid State Commun. 116, 585 (2000); P. Adler and S. Ghosh, Solid State Sci. 5, 445 (2003).
16. P. D. Battle et al., Chem. Commun. 987 (1998); S. Ghosh and P. Adler, Solid State Commun. 116, 585 (2000); P. Adler and S. Ghosh, Solid State Sci. 5, 445 (2003).
17. Y. Takeda et al., J. Solid State Chem. 63, 237 (1986).
18. J. P. Hodges et al., J. Solid State Chem. 151, 190 (2000).
19. A. Maljuk et al., J. Cryst. Growth 257, 427 (2003).
20. The 5 = 0.13(2) and 5 = 0.15(2) samples have very similar susceptibility curves and thus similar phase compositions are assumed.
21. C. Bernhard et al., Thin Solid Films (to be published).
22. 3 the hyperfine field is determined entirely by the isotropic Fermi contact interaction. The Mössbauer spectra are therefore not sensitive to a possible spin reorientation.
23. M. Takano et al., J. Solid State Chem. 73, 140 (1988).
24. 11 which should lead to paramagnetic sites even at 15 K [21]. The latter are indeed observed in the spectra of sample δ = 0.19.
25. P. D. Battle et al. J. Solid State Chem. 77, 124 (1988).
26. V.V. Gridin et al., Phys. Rev. B 53, 15518 (1998).
27. R. Rosenbaum et al., Phys. Rev. B 63, 094426 (2001).
28. S. A. Solin et al., Science 289, 1530 (2000).