Addressing group dynamics in a brief motivational intervention for college student drinkers

Journal of Drug Education

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 289-306

  Faris, Alexander S ^a   Brown, Janice M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ALCOHOLISM; ARTICLE; COLLEGE; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; GROUP DYNAMICS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTIVATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALCOHOL DRINKING; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; INTERVENTION STUDIES; MALE; MOTIVATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; STUDENTS;

EID: 1442335034     PISSN: 00472379     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/FEAL-12YH-31G7-NWH5     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. H. Wechsler, J. E. Lee, M. Kuo, M. Seibring, T. F. Nelson, and H. Lee, Trends in College Binge Drinking during a Period of Increased Prevention Efforts, Journal of American College Health, 50, pp. 203-217, 2002.
2. J. R. Knight, H. Wechsler, M. Kuo, M. Seibring, E. R. Weitzman, and M. Shuckit, Alcohol Abuse and Dependence among U.S. College Students, Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 63, pp. 263-270, 2002.
3. L. A. Dimeff, J. S. Baer, D. R. Kivlahan, and G. A. Marlatt, Brief Alcohol Screening and Intervention for College Students (BASICS): A Harm Reduction Approach, Guilford Press, New York, 1999.
4. W. R. Miller and S. Rollnick, Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change (2nd Edition), Guilford Press, New York, 2002.
5. J. S. Baer, G. A. Marlatt, D. R. Kivlahan, K. Fromme, M. E. Larimer, and E. Williams, An Experimental Test of Three Methods of Alcohol Risk-Reduction with Young Adults, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, pp. 974-979, 1992.
6. J. S. Baer, D. R. Kivlahan, A. W. Blume, P. McKnight, and G. A. Marlatt, Brief Intervention for Heavy-Drinking College Students: 4-Year Follow-Up and Natural History, American Journal of Public Health, 91, pp. 1310-1316, 2001.
7. B. Borsari and K. B. Carey, Effects of a Brief Motivational Intervention with College Student Drinkers, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, pp. 728-733, 2000.
8. J. G. Murphy, J. J. Duchnick, J. W. Vuchinich, R. S. Karg, A. M. Olson, A. F. Smith, and T. T. Coffey, Relative Efficacy of a Brief Motivational Intervention for College Student Drinkers, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 15, pp. 373-379, 2001.
9. S. T. Walters, M. E. Bennett, and J. H. Miller, Reducing Alcohol Use in College Students: A Controlled Trial of Two Brief Interventions, Journal of Drug Education, 30, pp. 361-372, 2000.
10. S. T. Walters, In Praise of Feedback: An Effective Intervention for College Students Who are Heavy Drinkers, Journal of American College Health, 48 pp. 235-238, 2000.
11. J. O. Prochaska and C. C. DiClemente, The Transtheoretical Approach: Crossing Traditional Boundaries of Therapy, Dow Jones/Irwin, Homewood, Illinois, 1984.
12. J. O. Prochaska and C. C. DiClemente, Toward a Comprehensive Model of Change, in Treating Addictive Behaviors: Processes of Change (1st Edition), W. R. Miller and N. Heather (eds.), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 3-27, 1986.
13. J. O. Prochaska, C. C. DiClemente, and C. Norcross, In Search of How People Change: Applications to Addictive Behaviors, American Psychologist, 47, pp. 1102-1114, 1992.
14. R. E. Petty and J. T. Cacioppo, Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1986.
15. R. H. Fazio, J. Chen, E. McDonel, and S. J. Sherman, Attitude Accessibility, Attitude-Behavior Consistency, and the Strength of the Object-Evaluation Association, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, pp. 339-357, 1982.
16. M. Diehl and W. Stroebe, Productivity Loss in Brainstorming Groups: Toward the Solution of a Riddle, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, pp. 497-509, 1987.
17. M. Diehl and W. Stroebe, Productivity Loss in Idea-Generating Groups: Tracking Down the Blocking Effect, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, pp. 392-403, 1991.
18. H. Lamm and G. Trommsdorff, Group versus Individual Performance on Tasks Requiring Ideational Proficiency (Brainstorming), European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, pp. 361-387, 1973.
19. T. J. Bouchard and M. Hare, Size, Performance, and Potential in Brainstorming Groups, Journal of Applied Psychology, 54, pp. 51-55, 1970.
20. D. W. Seal, L. M. Bogart, and A. A. Ehrhardt, Small Group Dynamics: The Utility of Focus Group Discussions as a Research Method, Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2, pp. 253-266, 1998.
21. J. Foote, A. DeLuca, S. Magura, A. Warner, A. Grand, A. Rosenblum, and S. Stahl, A Group Motivational Treatment for Chemical Dependency, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 17, pp. 181-192, 1999.
22. B. Latane, K. Williams, and S. Harkins, Many Hands Make Light the Work: The Causes and Consequences of Social Loafing, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, pp. 822-832, 1979.
23. B. Latane, The Psychology of Social Impact, American Psychologist, 36, pp. 343-356, 1981.
24. S. G. Harkins and R. E. Petty, Effects of Task Difficulty and Task Uniqueness on Social Loafing, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, pp. 1214-1229, 1982.
25. D. R. Comer, A Model of Social Loafing in Real Working Groups, Human Relations, 48, pp. 647-667, 1995.
26. D. R. Forsyth, Group Dynamics, Brooks/Cole Publishing, Belmont, California, 1990.
27. L. C. Sobell, M. B. Sobell, F. Klajner, and D. Paven, The Reliability of a Timeline Method for Assessing Normal Drinker College Students' Recent Drinking History: Utility for Alcohol Research, Addictive Behaviors, 11, pp. 149-161, 1986.
28. H. R. White and E. W. Labouvie, Towards the Assessment of Adolescent Problem Drinking, Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 50, pp. 30-37, 1989.
29. K. Fromme, E. A. Stroot, and D. Kaplan, Comprehensive Effects of Alcohol: Development and Psychometric Assessment of a New Expectancy Questionnaire, Psychological Assessment, 5, pp. 19-26, 1993.
30. W. R. Miller and J. S. Tonigan, Assessing Drinker's Motivation for Change: The Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale (SOCRATES), Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 10, pp. 81-89, 1996.
31. G. A. Marlatt (ed.), Harm Reduction: Pragmatic Strategies for Managing High-Risk Behaviors, Guilford Press, New York, 1998.
32. E. Single, Defining Harm Reduction, Drug and Alcohol Review, 14, pp. 287-290, 1995.
33. E. Single, The Concept of Harm Reduction and Its Application to Alcohol: The 6th Dorothy Black Lecture, Drugs: Education, Prevention, and Policy, 4, pp. 7-22, 1997.
34. R. H. Hoyle, J. C. Georgesen, and J. M. Webster, Analyzing Data from Individuals in Groups: The Past, the Present, and the Future, Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 5, pp. 41-47, 2001.
35. G. Burlingame, J. Kircher, and S. Taylor, Methodological Considerations in Group Psychotherapy Research: Past, Present, and Future Practices, in Handbook of Group Psychotherapy: An Empirical and Clinical Synthesis, A. Fuhriman and G. Burlingame (eds.), Wiley, New York, pp. 41-80, 1994.
36. J. B. Nezlek and L. E. Zyzniewski, Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling to Analyze Grouped Data, Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2, pp. 313-320, 1998.
37. B. N. Pollack, Hierarchical Linear Modeling and the "Unit of Analysis" Problem: A Solution for Analyzing Responses of Intact Group Members, Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2, pp. 299-312, 1998.