The use of energy-related characteristics in robust product design

Quality Engineering

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 213-222

  Wasserman, Gary S ^a,b,c,d,e  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b C   (United States)

^c GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^d Institute of Industrial Engineers   (United States)

^e Detroit Chapter of ASA   (United States)

Author keywords

Design of experiments; Robust product design; Taguchi methods

Indexed keywords

EID: 1442333240     PISSN: 08982112     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08982119708919128     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Nair, V. N. and Shoemaker, A. C., The Role of Experimentation in Quality Engineering: A Review of Taguchi's Contributions, in Statistical Design and Analysis of Industrial Experiments, edited by Subir Ghosh, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1990.
2. Phadke, M. S., Quality Engineering Using Robust Design, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1989.
3. Pignatiello, J. J., An Overview of the Strategy and Tactics of Taguchi, IIE Trans., 20(3), 247-254 (1988).
4. Taguchi, G. and Wu, Y., Introduction to Off-line Quality Control, Japan Quality Control Association, 1980.
5. Taguchi, G., System of Experimental Design, Unipub/Kraus International Publications, White Plain, NY, 1987.
6. Taguchi, G., Taguchi Methods Vol. 1, Research and Development, ASI Press, Dearborn, MI, 1991.
7. Taguchi, G., Taguchi Methods Vol. 3, Signal-to-Noise Ratio for Quality Evaluation, ASI Press, Dearborn, MI, 1991.
8. Taguchi, G., Taguchi Methods Vol. 4, Design of Experiments, ASI Press, Dearborn, MI, 1993.
9. Lunani, M., Nair, V. N., and Wasserman, G. S., Robust Design of Dynamic Systems: A Graphic Approach to Identifying Suitable Measures of Dispersion, J. Qual. Technol., 29(3), 327-338 (1997).
10. Leon, R., Shoemaker, A. C., and Kacker, R. N., Performance Measures Independent of Adjustment: An Explanation and Extension of Taguchi's Signal-to-Noise Ratios (with discussion), Technometrics, 9, 253-285 (1987).
11. Maghsoodloo, S., The Exact Relation of Taguchi's Signal-to-Noise Ratio to His Quality Loss Function, J. Qual. Technol., 22(1), 57-67 (1990).
12. Barker, T. B., Kacker, R., Box, G. E. P., and Taguchi, G., Controversial Aspects of Taguchi Methods: A Panel Discussion, ASQC Qual. Congr. Trans., 244-248 (1989).
13. Box, G., Bisgaard, S., and Fung, C., An Explanation and Critique of Taguchi's Contributions to Quality Engineering, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int., 4, 123-131 (1988).
14. Lucas, J. M., How to Achieve a Robust Process Using Response Surface Methodology, J. Qual. Technol., 26(4), 248-260 (1995).
15. Vining, G. G. and Myers, R. H., Combining Taguchi and Response Surface Philosophies: A Dual Response Approach, J. Qual. Technol., 22, 38-45 (1990).
16. Lin, D. K. J. and Wanzhu, T., Dual Response Surface Optimization, J. Qual. Technol., 27(1), 34-44 (1995).
17. Advanced Course on Quality Engineering, American Supplier Institute, Dearborn, MI, 1993.
18. Box, G. E. P. and Draper, N. R., Empirical Model-Building and Response Surface Methodology, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1988.
19. Lunani, M., A Graphical Approach to Identifying Suitable Performance Measures in Robust Design Using Dynamic Characteristics, M.S. dissertation, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI (1994).