The consent process in interventional radiology: The role of specialist nurses

Clinical Radiology

Volumn 59, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 246-252

  Davies, L ^a   Laasch, H U ^a   Wilbraham, L ^a,b   Marriott, A ^a   England, R E ^a   Martin, Derrick F ^a,b  

^a MANCHESTER UNIVERSITY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL LANCASHIRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Informed consent; Interventional procedures

Indexed keywords

ANXIETY; ARTICLE; CONSULTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; GASTROINTESTINAL RADIOGRAPHY; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NURSE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; RATING SCALE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

EID: 1442331921     PISSN: 00099260     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2003.09.011     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Guidelines to good practice-seeking patients' consent: ethical considerations. 1998; www.gmc-uk.org.
2. BMA, Consent Tool Kit. www.bma.org.uk/ap.nsf/content/consenttk2, accessed August 2002. London: British Medical Association; 2003, 2nd ed. p. 5-10.
3. Royal College of Physicians of London, Improving communication between doctors and patients a report of a working party. London: Royal College of Physicians; 1997.
4. Elwyn G, Edwards A. Informing patients and explaining risks. In: Schofield T, editor. Medicine. Abingdon: The Medicine Publishing Group; 2000. p. 31-3.
5. Chantler C, Doyal L. Medical ethics: the duties of care in principle and practice. In: Harris N, editor. Clinical negligence. London: Butterworths; 2000. p. 555-6.
6. McIlwain JC. Clinical risk management: principles of consent and patient information. Clin Otolaryngol 1999;24:255-61:
7. Doyal L. Informed consent: moral necessity or illusion? Qual Health Care 2001;10(Suppl. 1):i29-i33.
8. Gattellari M, Butow PN, Tattersall MH. Informed consent: what did the doctor say? Lancet 1999;353:1713.
9. Hutson MM, Blaha JD. Patients' recall of preoperative instruction for informed consent for an operation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991;73:160-2.
10. Hopper KD, Houts PS, TenHave TR, et al. The effect of informed consent on the level of anxiety in patients given i.v. contrast material. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;162:531-5.
11. Kerrigan DD, Thevasagayam RS, Woods TO, et al. Who's afraid of informed consent? BMJ 1993;306:298-300.
12. The Bristol Royal Infirmary Inquiry-final report. 2001;www.bristol-inquiry.org.uk, accessed August 2002.
13. Audit commission. What seems to be the matter? Communication between hospitals and patients. London: HMSO; 1993.
14. Coulter A, Entwistle V, Gilbert D. Sharing decisions with patients: is the information good enough? BMJ 1999;318: 318-22.
15. Herz DA. Informed consent: is it a myth? Neurosurgery 1992; 30:453-8.
16. Meredith P, Emberton M, Wood C. New directions in information for patients. BMJ 1995;311:4-5.
17. Alderson P. As plain as can be. Health Serv J 1994;106-28-9.
18. Digestive Disease Center, Public Information Site, Medical University of South Carolina 1998; www.ddc.musc.edu/ddcb/index.htm, accessed August 2002.
19. Edwards CR, Kendell RE, Munro JF. Principles of clinical examination. In: Munro J, editor. Macleod's Clinical Examination. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1995. p. 11.
20. Mueller PR, Biswal S, Halpern EF, Kaufman JA, Lee MJ. Interventional radiologic procedures: patient anxiety, perception of pain, understanding of procedure, and satisfaction with medication-a prospective study. Radiology 2000; 215:684-8.