Informed consent: What did the doctor say? (multiple letters) [10]

Lancet

Volumn 353, Issue 9165, 1999, Pages 1713-

  Gattellari, M ^a   Butow, P N ^a   Tattersall, M H N ^a   Heneghan, C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER PATIENT; CAROTID ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY; COMPREHENSION; DISEASE COURSE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; LETTER; LIFE EXPECTANCY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PATIENT EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; RECALL; RELIABILITY; STROKE; SURGICAL RISK; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT PLANNING; DECISION MAKING; NEOPLASM; NOTE; VIDEORECORDING;

DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MENTAL RECALL; NEOPLASMS; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PROGNOSIS; VIDEOTAPE RECORDING;

EID: 0033562646     PISSN: 01406736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)77027-6     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. AJ Lloyd PD Hayes NJM London PRF Bell AR Naylor Patients' ability to recall risk associated with treatment options Lancet 353 1999 645 646
2. M Gattellari PN Butow MHN Tattersall SM Dunn CA MacLeod Misunderstanding in cancer patients: why shoot the messenger Ann Oncol 10 1999 39 46
3. JC Weeks EF Cook S O'Day Relationship between cancer patients' predictions of prognosis and their treatment preferences JAMA 279 1998 1709 1714
4. D Damian MHN Tattersall Letters to patients: improving communication in cancer care Lancet 338 1991 923 925
5. MHN Tattersall PN Butow AM Griffin SM Dunn The take-home message: patients prefer consultation audiotapes to summary letters J Clin Oncol 12 1994 1305 1311